Haystacks
Well-Known Member
These threads always make me chuckle, they also end up in the same circular argument and the cause is very clear. Nobody ever qualifies what 'efficiency' is, nor what the environs in which this 'efficiency' is measured are.
For example, a road bike, on tarmac is efficient and proficient, however a roadie on singletrack is neither efficient nor proficient, on the other hand a XC bike on singletrack is efficient and proficient and also efficient and proficient on tarmac.
If i took two riders on bikes that are diametrically opposed IE roadie and fatbike, and set them on a two legged race, one leg on road the other on gnarly single track, each bike having to complete each leg and then combined the times, i know the fatty would win, the guy on the roadie gave up after 3 pinch flats and finally snapping his fork within the first 200m of offroad riding, the tortoise rolled on. The tortoise was also smart, he put 30psi in his tyres for the tarmac section.
For example, a road bike, on tarmac is efficient and proficient, however a roadie on singletrack is neither efficient nor proficient, on the other hand a XC bike on singletrack is efficient and proficient and also efficient and proficient on tarmac.
If i took two riders on bikes that are diametrically opposed IE roadie and fatbike, and set them on a two legged race, one leg on road the other on gnarly single track, each bike having to complete each leg and then combined the times, i know the fatty would win, the guy on the roadie gave up after 3 pinch flats and finally snapping his fork within the first 200m of offroad riding, the tortoise rolled on. The tortoise was also smart, he put 30psi in his tyres for the tarmac section.