Djangodog
Well-Known Member
- Region
- USA
- City
- Claremont, NH
Through various activities, I have seen the Government implement tighter restrictions and penalties, not because the average participant was acting badly, but because of the few that were pushing the boundaries, and the authorities pushed back. Unfortunately, when the pendulum swings back, it swings through and past the center.
I get that people want to go faster. I would find some of the European rules, (25 Km/hr), to be a bit of an over reach, but in general, we don’t get to choose which laws we can ignore. I am all for civil disobedience, but not for flying under the radar. Laws can be changed, and there is a right and a wrong way to bring about those changes. The wrong way often results in less freedom.
During the 1980s, the FAA decided that too many private pilots were endangering too many commercial aircraft and people on the ground. The result was that those “cowboys” pushed the FAA to further restrict the airspace that the average private pilot could make use of. Now with all the “yahoos” showing off on YouTube with their STOL and Bush Pilot antics, they are once again putting themselves in the FAA’s cross hairs.
My concern is that if we abuse the regulations that exist, we will cause the restrictions to become tighter and the penalties to become more severe. In my opinion anyway, progress isn’t about going faster or being more powerful, (that already exists and it’s called a motorcycle). I think of progress as greater range, lighter weight, better handling, better, e-bike specific components etc…
These are my opinions and I am quite sure that some others will strongly disagree. To me anyway, it is an important topic and worth the ruffling of some feathers. “your freedom ends where the next person begins”.
Please try to be constructive in your responses. If you have a different point of view, please share it. I am not saying that my point of view is correct, just that it reflects my concerns for the future of e-bikes.
I get that people want to go faster. I would find some of the European rules, (25 Km/hr), to be a bit of an over reach, but in general, we don’t get to choose which laws we can ignore. I am all for civil disobedience, but not for flying under the radar. Laws can be changed, and there is a right and a wrong way to bring about those changes. The wrong way often results in less freedom.
During the 1980s, the FAA decided that too many private pilots were endangering too many commercial aircraft and people on the ground. The result was that those “cowboys” pushed the FAA to further restrict the airspace that the average private pilot could make use of. Now with all the “yahoos” showing off on YouTube with their STOL and Bush Pilot antics, they are once again putting themselves in the FAA’s cross hairs.
My concern is that if we abuse the regulations that exist, we will cause the restrictions to become tighter and the penalties to become more severe. In my opinion anyway, progress isn’t about going faster or being more powerful, (that already exists and it’s called a motorcycle). I think of progress as greater range, lighter weight, better handling, better, e-bike specific components etc…
These are my opinions and I am quite sure that some others will strongly disagree. To me anyway, it is an important topic and worth the ruffling of some feathers. “your freedom ends where the next person begins”.
Please try to be constructive in your responses. If you have a different point of view, please share it. I am not saying that my point of view is correct, just that it reflects my concerns for the future of e-bikes.
Last edited: