I'm talking about the Creo 2. AFIAK
Specialized has not sold the original Creo for years. It does not have all the mounts you'd get on a touring bike (lol? can't tell if you're joking). It doesn't even have upper mounts for a standard rear rack.
According to Specialized, and I quote, "LOAD UP, HEAD OUT: Take a little or a lot on any ride. Creo 2 Alloy accepts a variety of front, rear, and low-rider racks. Who says you can’t take it all?"
Whilst it can take racks, a more lightweight approach to touring, or rather backpacking, can avoid them. Saddle bags such as the Porcelain Rocket Mr Fusion v2, combined with frame bags, handlebar bags, and the like, work fine.
Holland Track Day 2: Salsa Mukluk at Granite Rock Outcrop by
Andrew Priest, on Flickr
I now use a rack because my bikepacking is often in areas where I need to carry two plus days of water, e.g.,
Next Stop Bremer Bay - {Day 08-08} by
Andrew Priest, on Flickr
Theres a reason that bike touring is the last refuge of bar end shifters. The reliability considerations are very different when you're planning on week long rides, where a mechanical you can't repair on the side of the road means you don't get to finish your ride that you spent potentially months planning.
Whilst my Surly Long Haul Trucker has bar ends that I have long since lost their indexing, I have done remote bikepacking with MTB shifters (on the Salsa Mukluk) above, and now with electronic shifting on the R&M Supercharger due to having a Rohloff Speedhub E14.
The Rohloff hubs are well-renowned for touring ...
Even disc brakes are becoming the norm on 'touring' bikes. Personally, having ridden my Long Haul Trucker a week ago on a rough dirt track, I would not go back to rim brakes. My preference is mechanical disc brakes, but the R&M Supercharger has hydraulic brakes.