D
Deleted member 4210
Guest
This is an interesting article. If you read between the lines, it appears the major names in the industry that all go through traditional IBD's (i.e. Trek, Giant, Accell (Raleigh), Specialized, etc.) are missing the bulk of the sales in the US.
https://www.bicycleretailer.com/opi...ibd-e-bike-market-share-part-one#.XI-_0CJKg-1
BPSA estimated about $134,000,000 in sales for 2018 which is essentially data from established traditional bicycle channels, who are now carrying ebikes. Since there are many alternate channels for ebikes, including new ebike only stores (that aren't part of BPSA data), on-line retailers galore, and many direct shipments from China, other data suggests sales could have been between $250,000,000 and $300,000,000 in 2018.
With between 125 and 150 different brands of ebikes available in the US, per the consultants info mentioned in the article, and a LOT of those brands not selling through traditional bike shops, not only are the bike shops themselves missing the opportunity but the big guys aren't capturing it either as they typically insist on fairly tight requirements to allow a non-traditional outlet to sell their ebikes, which basically means only regular bike carrying shops can qualify.
Given that the ebikes from those players like Giant, Trek, Raleigh, Specialized, and others from Europe that are more premium brands like Stromer, Haibike, Tern, Reise&Mueller, A2B, BESV, Bulls, Cube, BH, Fantic, Gazelle, KahlKoff, Piaggio, Van Moof, Felt, Scott, and others, offer ebikes that are mostly priced in the $3000 to $6000 price range, it provokes the question of are their ebikes simply too high priced for the majority of would be ebike riders ?
There are a handful of non-traditional firms who never before offered regular bikes, like Pedego, Evelo, and GoCycle, who also have their ebike models priced fairly high (i.e. usually $3000 to $5000) that are doing ok to pretty darn good.
However, I suspect (based on the ESE data in the article) that the firms that have most of their ebikes priced between $800 and $2500, such as Rad Power, Magnum, Surface 604, Blix, Biktrix, Juiced, Sondors, E-Lux, M2S, e-Joe, Prodecotech, Amego, IGO, Aventon, Mate, etc. have carved out and will continue to carve out some rather significant unit sales numbers, and perhaps even revenue numbers that would make the "Biggies" blush with shame.
I would even go so far as to suggest that these Ebike only OEM's (who have models priced mostly between $800 and $2500) make up 75% of the difference between BPSA unit numbers, and the ESE numbers. With the other also rans (not listed here) making up the remaining 25%.
The 2019 projections are fairly aggressive, looking at 300,000 in unit sales to the USA. If it turns out that way, that would probably mean the market share growth of the non-traditional names that haven't been building regular bikes, are truly sticking it to the Big guys.
JUST A HUNCH: Big guys probably need to offer many more models priced below $2500, and to ditch trying to sell so many mid drives. (which add close to $1000 per copy versus hub drive). The typical ebike buyer, as Rad, Magnum, and many others have proven, could care less about the 'benefits' of a mid drive.
Can't wait to see Part 2 come out from this same source.
https://www.bicycleretailer.com/opi...ibd-e-bike-market-share-part-one#.XI-_0CJKg-1
BPSA estimated about $134,000,000 in sales for 2018 which is essentially data from established traditional bicycle channels, who are now carrying ebikes. Since there are many alternate channels for ebikes, including new ebike only stores (that aren't part of BPSA data), on-line retailers galore, and many direct shipments from China, other data suggests sales could have been between $250,000,000 and $300,000,000 in 2018.
With between 125 and 150 different brands of ebikes available in the US, per the consultants info mentioned in the article, and a LOT of those brands not selling through traditional bike shops, not only are the bike shops themselves missing the opportunity but the big guys aren't capturing it either as they typically insist on fairly tight requirements to allow a non-traditional outlet to sell their ebikes, which basically means only regular bike carrying shops can qualify.
Given that the ebikes from those players like Giant, Trek, Raleigh, Specialized, and others from Europe that are more premium brands like Stromer, Haibike, Tern, Reise&Mueller, A2B, BESV, Bulls, Cube, BH, Fantic, Gazelle, KahlKoff, Piaggio, Van Moof, Felt, Scott, and others, offer ebikes that are mostly priced in the $3000 to $6000 price range, it provokes the question of are their ebikes simply too high priced for the majority of would be ebike riders ?
There are a handful of non-traditional firms who never before offered regular bikes, like Pedego, Evelo, and GoCycle, who also have their ebike models priced fairly high (i.e. usually $3000 to $5000) that are doing ok to pretty darn good.
However, I suspect (based on the ESE data in the article) that the firms that have most of their ebikes priced between $800 and $2500, such as Rad Power, Magnum, Surface 604, Blix, Biktrix, Juiced, Sondors, E-Lux, M2S, e-Joe, Prodecotech, Amego, IGO, Aventon, Mate, etc. have carved out and will continue to carve out some rather significant unit sales numbers, and perhaps even revenue numbers that would make the "Biggies" blush with shame.
I would even go so far as to suggest that these Ebike only OEM's (who have models priced mostly between $800 and $2500) make up 75% of the difference between BPSA unit numbers, and the ESE numbers. With the other also rans (not listed here) making up the remaining 25%.
The 2019 projections are fairly aggressive, looking at 300,000 in unit sales to the USA. If it turns out that way, that would probably mean the market share growth of the non-traditional names that haven't been building regular bikes, are truly sticking it to the Big guys.
JUST A HUNCH: Big guys probably need to offer many more models priced below $2500, and to ditch trying to sell so many mid drives. (which add close to $1000 per copy versus hub drive). The typical ebike buyer, as Rad, Magnum, and many others have proven, could care less about the 'benefits' of a mid drive.
Can't wait to see Part 2 come out from this same source.