It is a nice bike but only has 50Nm of torque. Whimpey. Mine have 90Nm and are open source and fully programable through the displays by each owner who controls the bike he or she owns. Buying a dog that you cannot train or control is kind of silly in my opinion. I know and I sell these bikes as well as my own custom bikes. Interoperability of components is important as is the right to repair.
This is an area you have no idea what you're talking about; and you are a person in California building one-off bikes for an entirely different segment, not a multi-national corp catering to wide interests. Why you have to interject here is beyond me, but at least you didn't post eleventy pix of your totally unrelated builds.
The 50nm of mid-drive torque is extremely effective for riders who have some basic fitness and need help at times - hell, my 55lb Vado 3 has 55nm at max (which I rarely if ever tap) and that thing is a joy to ride (for this late 50's 200lb person who isn't exactly an Olympic athlete). O, when I go to the grocery and haul home several 10's of lbs of groceries, that wimpy (not whimpey) 55nm makes the ride a breeze.
Do you offer mobile apps? Because the mobile apps for these bikes, along with the controllers, are
fully programable through the displays by each owner who controls the bike he or she owns.
Let's talk open source. I worked for the formerly largest open source software company in the world for over a decade, which was bought by Big Blue. Some questions:
- Where is your code repository for this OS software? I want to see the code.
- Where is the issue tracker for this code, and who is resolving the bugs/issues?
- Under which license is the code released?
- What is the release cadence?
- How many contributors are there?
- If you are unavailable, how does one get support?
If you can't point to the above, your stuff is not open source.
Now, if you think fully programmable bicycle control via a user interface is "open source," you have no frickin' idea what you're talking about. By this standard, Bosch, Spesh, every bike that offers a user interface to control the bike is open source.
Hint: these are very closed-source/proprietary systems that simply expose configuration to the user.
Right to repair and interoperability of components? This is a joke, right?
Again, where's your code repo where I can modify the code? As far as the mechanical and electronic systems, if one needs to repair or replace:
- Tires, wheels, brakes, gears, levers, handlebars, pedals, cranks, fork - go to the LBS or an online retailer and buy what's needed.
- Wiring harness, motor, display, battery, controller - go to the manufacturer, either under warranty or with a credit card and get the needful.
- Repair away!
- The bike cartel has done a wonderful job with interoperability, btw - I had a bike with an SRAM crankset, bb; Shimano chain, cassette, derailleur; 2 different tires OMG!!!1!1!11
I respect what you do, but your use of buzzwords (open source, right to repair) indicates sly marketing and superficial (at best) understanding of each. And it makes your arguments
against certain bikes and mfgrs ring very hollow and empty; but it does fulfill your obvious need to continually denigrate those mfgrs and the owners of their bikes, yawn.
This message was written on an Asus laptop running ArchLinux (Free software (GNU GPL and other licenses)) via the OS Firefox browser:
Code:
[joe@croozah2 ~]$ uname -a
Linux croozah2 6.9.1-arch1-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri, 17 May 2024 16:56:38 +0000 x86_64 GNU/Linux