Well, I'll see moving forward if or if not the opinions as well as first hand experience are worth my ongoing contribution to these discussions.
Yes, I too fell for the look as well as the latest and greatest technology that can be had, and I feel like maybe I've been had.
I've not yet asked the LBS or Trek to offer a buy back, but I most likely will.
Whether I buy I Turbo Vado SL 5.0 EQ (which I'm supposed to try out later today or tomorrow) or I stick with another model of Trek's offerings is yet to be seen.
"Every bike has its problems" is not a reassuring or comfortable thought.
Sure, nothing is perfect, but I still say that maybe this Allant + 9.9S was released well before all the wrinkles were worked out.
I just want to ride, rinse, repeat, do required maintenance at scheduled intervals and not be the tester of real world reporting of negative experiences or problems on how it's panning out and have midstream mods, rectification procedures and fantastic customer service keeping me stroked.
I understand that a bike is a bike and we can have 1,000,000,000 examples or analogies of any product or service but the point here, as well as what others have contributed is:
Was this bike well thought out before its final production go ahead?
HEAVY chest pains regarding this entire process.
Will it be any different with a Specialized, a R&M, a 'anything' from 'anyone' bike?
I've got maybe 10-15 years of life before I'm wearing Depends and drinking Ensure and would like to be able to enjoy whats left of my life as well as whatever normalcy exists in the real world before everything ends.
I'm sure I'll be taking a bath on the Allant + 9.9S if Trek does not want it back.
Sure, they have bent backwards, but key is just like any database, reporting, real world results, will we ever know how many were sold, how many had/have issues, and on and on and on.