Jeebus, someone pointed out another of the insane lies here. Now Cucker Tarlson is a legitimate news source.
FACT. The Russian state nuclear company,
Rosatom, bought Canadian mining company
Uranium One in 2010. Uranium One had, and still has, uranium mining rights in the United States. uranium is widely bought and sold around the world for a range of purposes, from nuclear power plant fuel to medical treatments and research.
Uranium One's share of mining rights is now far less than 20 percent of the U.S. total.
Just when you think it couldn’t be nuttier it becomes a peanut factory. Controlled globally by Amy Carter. A Russian operative.
What Tom said would be considered lying if Tom knew what he is talking about.
Here is the post I made which Tom has bravely blindered himself from seeing direct:.
Where were you when Obama and Hillary OK'd the deal that made 20% of US yellowcake uranium get sold to Putin?
Politifact:
the FBI
was investigating corruption by the Russian company involved in the deal before the transfer was approved
Already under corruption investigation before HiIlary voted for it.
See that, Tom? Conveniently "no"?
I like to use sources that "the other side" likes. Here's Democrat rag Politifact giving the true part of their usual half-truths.
As secretary of state, Clinton did serve on a government board that ultimately approved a transfer of uranium, but she wasn’t the deciding vote. And the Clinton Foundation did receive $145 million from parties involved in the transaction
Ask yourself if, as Secretary of State, "Is the voting mentioned by Politifact the only control Hillary had?"
And "Did Obama have any control ability?"
The Hill
The approval for the takeover was inked by a nine-agency review board that included the State Department when Clinton was secretary of State.
So Hillary voted for it and put her pen to it, in her function as Secretary of State
Did Tom even get close to telling the truth regarding a claim specifically about Hillary and Obama's involvement? No, he didn't even mention them.
I like to use sources the opposition HAS TO lap up.
A controversial tale involving Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, uranium and Russia continues to rear its ugly he
www.politifact.com
Let's take a closer look at the headline.
Says Hillary Clinton sold 20 percent of America’s uranium to Russia and then "the Russian government gave $145 million to the Clinton Foundation." Former FBI Director and special counsel Robert Mueller "delivered it."
Note that on Mueller the quotation marks are only around "delivered it".
Why would that be? Did he not "deliver", or did he not deliver"it". Did he do anything? What is the "it"? The uranium? The donation?
Mueller was the FBI director at the time, and the FBI
was investigating corruption by the Russian company involved in the deal before the transfer was approved. But he played no role in delivering anything that we could find.
So there was a question of corruption in the company they approved the deal for and they all knew that. Politifact says he played no role in delivering anything they could find. Did they assume Mueller would have had to carry the product over in a ship?
Isn't a better question "Did Mueller travel to Russia or send anyone to Russia regarding the sale at that time ?"
What about this question: "What role(s),if any, did Mueller play in the deal?"
What other contacts did Bill and Hillary have with Putin around that time? Any benefits?