World War III

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't not hear a russian accent, when I read hbars posts.
Well, you may be right. Perhaps the entire Ukraine issue is actually work of Moose and Squirrel.
 

Attachments

  • D6F9F4B7-55E4-4F63-8182-3D4AAAB58967.jpeg
    D6F9F4B7-55E4-4F63-8182-3D4AAAB58967.jpeg
    110 KB · Views: 195
Not a well-fitted comparison. Why?
1. Nazis are humans
2. I do not call Ukrainians nazis.
3. The nazi forces took over Zelenski immediately, so the forces are nazi by choice or are compelled to function as nazi forces.
 

Attachments

  • 3A874E5F-6AA5-4318-AFDD-02899F4075F4.gif
    3A874E5F-6AA5-4318-AFDD-02899F4075F4.gif
    2.6 MB · Views: 214
"Summertime, and the living is easy . . ."
It's not cold, and You've nowhere to go. . ."
Daddy Biden is rich, and you're Vogue shoot is good lookin'
 
NY public service announcements about nuclear war and how to prepare and have a go bag ready to evacuate....
"I know there's a pot of gold for me
All I got to do is just believe
I'm so happy doin' the neutron shuffle
And I'm just burning doin' the neutron shuffle". Pointer Sisters
 
1659091790583.png

"Another part of the definition of fascism is cleansing: the removal of opponents and enemies, whether ethnic or political (Mann, 2004). In the 20th century, the Nazis targeted specific ethnic groups, while Italian Fascists targeted political groups (Mann, 2004). In the case of Ukraine, anti-Roma pogroms are an example of ethnic cleansing. One of the groups responsible for the multiple deadly attacks on Roma camps in the spring of 2018 was the National Druzhina. This street patrol and militia is arguably a component of the Azov movement, as it is a volunteer paramilitary group formed under the National Corps, which is a political party created by Azov leadership (Miller, 2018).

While there has not been outright anti-Semitic violence linked to Azov, the group’s blatant neo-nazism can be addressed. In 2016, Azov entered the political arena with its new leader, Andrew Biletsky. Biletsky has a history of being involved with the far-right and once said in 2010 that the nation’s mission was to “lead the white races of the world in a final crusade… against Semite-led Untermenschen [subhumans]” (Miller, 2018). Biletsky also had a leadership role in the ultranationalist organization, Patriot of Ukraine, which according to the Kharkiv Human Rights Group “espoused xenophobic and neo-Nazi ideas and was engaged in violent attacks against migrants, foreign students in Kharkiv, and those opposing its views” (Miller, 2018)."
 
Do not assume that decreasing surface weight wouldn't have any Teutonic effects, even large water reservoirs can cause mild tremors( ask Randall Carlsen about "rebound)
I think you misunderstand my post. When people view the model predictions of temperature vs recorded temperatures, they see a nice fit...what they don't realize is that past is refitted with data later and the past "prediction" has been "informed" by later events...thus the past modeled temperature is informed by later data. That's how it conforms to reality...the model gets to know what actually happened.
The Pinatubo eruption was in June 1991. See the model match better than any other area on the graph.

1659098272590.png

It's as if I modeled my horse race wager predictions and later showed you my accuracy but my model was later informed of all the actual conditions, like if one horse had a heart attack in the race, if one jockey was blackmailed, and so on, and my bet history was then changed to present a false picture of success to you.
 
Last edited:
Do not assume that decreasing surface weight wouldn't have any Teutonic effects, even large water reservoirs can cause mild tremors( ask Randall Carlsen about "rebound)
Indeed, the known great effect of a big eruption is why the model suddenly clings to the recorded temperature so well. All the other singular effects, such as clouds and aerosols, are almost unknowns. That's why in a massive UN IPPC report at the time of the crooked hockey stick furor, there was only 6 pages on clouds; they have no clue.
 
The trouble with only one functional "nuclear device" is( wait for it) you will be inundated with Dozens of functional nuclear weapons.

Do not assume that decreasing surface weight wouldn't have any Teutonic effects, even large water reservoirs can cause mild tremors( ask Randall Carlsen about "rebound)
I think you mean tectonic effects, not Teutonic effects... 😄
 
So now apparently the nazi forces used HiMARs to hit their own POWs in the Mariupol region prison. Edit: now said to be 53 dead..
The nazi forces are in a mess, in disarray, after their attempted comeback which drew them together and left other areas weak and under increasingly withering bombardments.
How is this even possible, in the face of the oh so real news from Mulesky's Politico and and Daily Beast reports?
 
Last edited:
Jeebus, someone pointed out another of the insane lies here. Now Cucker Tarlson is a legitimate news source.

FACT. The Russian state nuclear company, Rosatom, bought Canadian mining company Uranium One in 2010. Uranium One had, and still has, uranium mining rights in the United States. uranium is widely bought and sold around the world for a range of purposes, from nuclear power plant fuel to medical treatments and research.

Uranium One's share of mining rights is now far less than 20 percent of the U.S. total.

Just when you think it couldn’t be nuttier it becomes a peanut factory. Controlled globally by Amy Carter. A Russian operative.
 

Jeebus, someone pointed out another of the insane lies here. Now Cucker Tarlson is a legitimate news source.

FACT. The Russian state nuclear company, Rosatom, bought Canadian mining company Uranium One in 2010. Uranium One had, and still has, uranium mining rights in the United States. uranium is widely bought and sold around the world for a range of purposes, from nuclear power plant fuel to medical treatments and research.

Uranium One's share of mining rights is now far less than 20 percent of the U.S. total.

Just when you think it couldn’t be nuttier it becomes a peanut factory. Controlled globally by Amy Carter. A Russian operative.
What Tom said would be considered lying if Tom knew what he is talking about.
Here is the post I made which Tom has bravely blindered himself from seeing direct:.
Where were you when Obama and Hillary OK'd the deal that made 20% of US yellowcake uranium get sold to Putin?

Politifact:
the FBI was investigating corruption by the Russian company involved in the deal before the transfer was approved
Already under corruption investigation before HiIlary voted for it.
See that, Tom? Conveniently "no"?




I like to use sources that "the other side" likes. Here's Democrat rag Politifact giving the true part of their usual half-truths.
As secretary of state, Clinton did serve on a government board that ultimately approved a transfer of uranium, but she wasn’t the deciding vote. And the Clinton Foundation did receive $145 million from parties involved in the transaction
Ask yourself if, as Secretary of State, "Is the voting mentioned by Politifact the only control Hillary had?"
And "Did Obama have any control ability?"

The Hill
The approval for the takeover was inked by a nine-agency review board that included the State Department when Clinton was secretary of State.
So Hillary voted for it and put her pen to it, in her function as Secretary of State


Did Tom even get close to telling the truth regarding a claim specifically about Hillary and Obama's involvement? No, he didn't even mention them.



I like to use sources the opposition HAS TO lap up.

Let's take a closer look at the headline.
Says Hillary Clinton sold 20 percent of America’s uranium to Russia and then "the Russian government gave $145 million to the Clinton Foundation." Former FBI Director and special counsel Robert Mueller "delivered it."


Note that on Mueller the quotation marks are only around "delivered it".
Why would that be? Did he not "deliver", or did he not deliver"it". Did he do anything? What is the "it"? The uranium? The donation?


Mueller was the FBI director at the time, and the FBI was investigating corruption by the Russian company involved in the deal before the transfer was approved. But he played no role in delivering anything that we could find.
So there was a question of corruption in the company they approved the deal for and they all knew that. Politifact says he played no role in delivering anything they could find. Did they assume Mueller would have had to carry the product over in a ship?

Isn't a better question "Did Mueller travel to Russia or send anyone to Russia regarding the sale at that time ?"
What about this question: "What role(s),if any, did Mueller play in the deal?"

What other contacts did Bill and Hillary have with Putin around that time? Any benefits?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back