Specialized Turbo Vado SL: An Incredible E-Bike (User Club)

Yes but 240 W is when you max the motor out (but that is not what you typically want). Now, I can put 110 W for some time if I have to. "Big" Vado motor maxes out at 520 W. Go figure.
well, true! any source of approx 400w (on the drops, skinny tires) or 550w (on the bar tops, fat tires) on a class 3 ebike should result in 28mph. it can be any combination of human and machine!

big vado has enough power to overcome the higher drag, no doubt!
 
I agree aero plays a vital role at such speed! That's why I could never match any time-trial cyclists!
 
I haven’t done any true A:B:C tests with them, but the Vado will indeed motor along quickly. That 4x You power is very evident. I believe you are correct in thinking of the SL as a fitness e-bike.

In a similar light, the Vado is more of a workhorse form of transportation for most people. It just has a lot of oomph when you want it.

The Creo is just another beast though. It invites you to go fast, almost always. I don’t care if it’s “only” 2x You. The design of it, the light weight, the essence that it is a Roubaix with a motor, you can put out serious speed on it.

I suppose if one put Specialized CL50 carbon wheels on a Vado (if they fit!) with 700x28 tires, and drop bars (what the heck!) it could rip along at the 28mph cut out speed fairly effortlessly!
 
I haven’t done any true A:B:C tests with them, but the Vado will indeed motor along quickly. That 4x You power is very evident. I believe you are correct in thinking of the SL as a fitness e-bike.

In a similar light, the Vado is more of a workhorse form of transportation for most people. It just has a lot of oomph when you want it.

The Creo is just another beast though. It invites you to go fast, almost always. I don’t care if it’s “only” 2x You. The design of it, the light weight, the essence that it is a Roubaix with a motor, you can put out serious speed on it.

I suppose if one put Specialized CL50 carbon wheels on a Vado (if they fit!) with 700x28 tires, and drop bars (what the heck!) it could rip along at the 28mph cut out speed fairly effortlessly!
I mean the Creo SL is 3kg lighter than the Vado SL. You'd expect that 2x motor to be a bit more efficient with the less weight. That said, I'm extremely happy with the Vado 4.0 SL EQ performance. I've had it now a month or two for my daily commute and just going on some bike rides at the weekend to explore our neighbourhood. I'm loving it.

Would I get a Creo SL if I could afford it? Damn right I would. Look at the paint job!

Quick note about the standard Vado. That 4x motor is a beast. I don't really have anything to compare it to other than the SL at the shop, and it has no problem shifting the extra weight. If I had a really long commute (20km+) I'd have opted for that for sure. Unfortunately we also have no secure means of storage so 26kg bike on the wall doesn't go down well with the mrs ;-)
 
I'm very happy with my Vado SL EQ too. It's plenty fast enough for me. I'm fit enough, have no injuries (knock on wood), so it's only the toughest hills where I wish the motor put out more.

I probably could have (barely!) afforded the Creo SL (E5 version) when I bought the Vado SL earlier this year, but I didn't for the simple reason that I wanted an everyday fitness/commuter bike. One with fenders, lights, kick stand, sitting comfortably upright, etc.. The Creo just isn't like that. Sure, you could put fenders and lights on it, maybe a rack, but it's really a speed machine. My next bike will be a Creo though. :cool:
 
I'm very happy with my Vado SL EQ too. It's plenty fast enough for me. I'm fit enough, have no injuries (knock on wood), so it's only the toughest hills where I wish the motor put out more.

I probably could have (barely!) afforded the Creo SL (E5 version) when I bought the Vado SL earlier this year, but I didn't for the simple reason that I wanted an everyday fitness/commuter bike. One with fenders, lights, kick stand, sitting comfortably upright, etc.. The Creo just isn't like that. Sure, you could put fenders and lights on it, maybe a rack, but it's really a speed machine. My next bike will be a Creo though. :cool:
That the Creo model I have. I have put a rack on it and a rear light. I don't really ride at night anymore so don't really need a front light but could add a battery powered one if needed. I try not riding in rain so fenders are not on it at the moment. I do get caught in the rain and deal with it! Under my body, it is probably not "really a speed machine!" ;) And then with the 20 or 30 bike 10-essentials (hiking prep), it is even more loaded down!
 
Guys,

The Lezyne StVZO headlight as delivered with Vado SL simply rocks!

1634069758796.png


I was on my first long night ride with the Vado SL since I have bought it. Long kilometres spent on a smooth service road allowed me setting the angle (both vertical and lateral) with the GoPro mount I'm using. There was nothing I wouldn't see on the road at a distance of at least 25 metres! And the beam top cut-off made the approaching drivers happy.

At that short stop, I also assessed the visibility of the tail-light: just perfect. I felt so safe during long hours of pedalling in the darkness, with the subtle motor whirr, so I didn't feel alone...

See the temperature read-out: 7 C or 45 F. The Wahoo ELEMNT Roam has been eventually calibrated against GPS for Wheel Circumference for Schwalbe Smart Sam 37-622: the figure is 2157 mm (as opposed to 2180 specified by Specialized). 100% match with Strava! (In the Correct Distance mode, the distance ridden according to the map was virtually the same as given by Wahoo. And Wahoo gets the distance from the e-bike's rear wheel RPM and specified WhC).
 
Last edited:
I've just ordered the second Range Extender plus a 220 mm cable.
I hope to be able to ride at 66% assistance for more than 100 km on group gravel rides.
I plan removing the fenders, rack, and relocating the tail-light for the Spring. Vado SL in such a configuration should become a Creo EVO equivalent for gravel cycling, minus the drop handlebars.

Now, I'm experimenting with discharging the RE first. That should help getting the main battery and the RE #1 at equal number of recharges.
 
I've just ordered the second Range Extender plus a 220 mm cable.
I hope to be able to ride at 66% assistance for more than 100 km on group gravel rides.
I plan removing the fenders, rack, and relocating the tail-light for the Spring. Vado SL in such a configuration should become a Creo EVO equivalent for gravel cycling, minus the drop handlebars.

Now, I'm experimenting with discharging the RE first. That should help getting the main battery and the RE #1 at equal number of recharges.
Be prepared for when the power turns off as the RE approaches "zero" and that the system does not immediately switch to the Internal Battery. At least, that is what happened to me climbing a hill. "What? No POWER!!!?" I've only had that happen the one time. I went back to parallel discharge since it happened at an inconvenient time.
 
Be prepared for when the power turns off as the RE approaches "zero" and that the system does not immediately switch to the Internal Battery. At least, that is what happened to me climbing a hill. "What? No POWER!!!?" I've only had that happen the one time. I went back to parallel discharge since it happened at an inconvenient time.
Thank you for your warning! My intention for the next couple of days will be not discharging the RE totally but rather noting how much of range boost a single RE could give me, depending on the average assistance % and other factors.
 
I've just ordered the second Range Extender plus a 220 mm cable.
I hope to be able to ride at 66% assistance for more than 100 km on group gravel rides.
I plan removing the fenders, rack, and relocating the tail-light for the Spring. Vado SL in such a configuration should become a Creo EVO equivalent for gravel cycling, minus the drop handlebars.

Now, I'm experimenting with discharging the RE first. That should help getting the main battery and the RE #1 at equal number of recharges.
I like the way you are thinking, however to turn the Vado SL into a Diverge Evo-like variant of the Creo, you’d ideally also swap out the wheels to something lighter and more performance oriented. These wheels would be ideal, but aren’t cheap.

Then run something like Pathfinder Pro tires.

You might also find yourself flipping the stem to make things more aero.
 
I like the way you are thinking, however to turn the Vado SL into a Diverge Evo-like variant of the Creo, you’d ideally also swap out the wheels to something lighter and more performance oriented. These wheels would be ideal, but aren’t cheap.

Then run something like Pathfinder Pro tires.

You might also find yourself flipping the stem to make things more aero.
An interesting advice! I wouldn't rather swap the wheels as doing so feels to be above my station :) Could you explain "flipping the stem"? Meaning, pointing several degrees downwards? (Will Redshift ShockStop work oriented that way? Wait... It will!)
 
Last edited:
An interesting advice! I wouldn't rather swap the wheels as doing so feels to be above my station :) Could you explain "flipping the stem"? Meaning, pointing several degrees downwards? (Will Redshift ShockStop work oriented that way? Wait... It will!)
Also known as "slamming the stem" to get a lower and more aero position by much younger riders. As a reference the Creo is considered a "somewhat upright position" vs the Crux with a "somewhat aggressive" position for gravel bikes.
 
Also known as "slamming the stem" to get a lower and more aero position by much younger riders. As a reference the Creo is considered a "somewhat upright position" vs the Crux with a "somewhat aggressive" position for gravel bikes.
Thank you both @Rider51 and @Allan47.7339! It looks very promising; let me check how flexible my body really is :)
 
The Vado SL comes with a 14 deg angled up stem that I think is 70 or 80mm long. That's fairly short, and fairly angled up. As Allan noted, if the Creo is fairly relaxed, compared to the Crux for example, the Vado SL is even more upright. In bike terms, the Vado SL has a shorter reach, and higher stack. So in this case you'd literally take the stem off, and flip it upside down. It's now a -14 deg stem. Which means your handlebars are now about an inch lower than they were before, putting you in a much more tucked, aero position.

A better option may be to just buy another stem that's a bit longer, and not as angled. Something around 110mm in length, and +6 degree rise, which is very common. This may not seem like a huge difference in numbers, but I assure you, if you've been riding a while in the current set-up, you'll notice. Stems are fairly easy to replace yourself.

The SL 5.0 with the future shock and carbon fork will perform better on gravel than the 4.0, though having something like the RedShift stem can certainly compensate. In my experience the future shock (1.5 and 2.0 that is) has better dampering and rebound than the RedShift stem, which can feel a little like a pogo-stick on some terrain (I have not tried the RedShift Pro, I should note). But I also know there are a lot of happy owners of RedShift as well.
 
@Rider51: I have replaced the Vado SL stem with Redshift ShockStop with these dimensions:
  • Length: 100 mm
  • Angle: +6 degrees
Ideas? Flip or not?

(Vibration dampening of Redshift is excellent. Now, let us talk about the riding position).

A leaned over position always gets me in the neck from having to look "up" to look forward. My road bike has become less comfortable for me recently due to this.
Doug, I hate that, too. Yet the Autumn winds and the air drag is what I hate even more...
 
Last edited:
Be prepared for when the power turns off as the RE approaches "zero" and that the system does not immediately switch to the Internal Battery. At least, that is what happened to me climbing a hill. "What? No POWER!!!?" I've only had that happen the one time. I went back to parallel discharge since it happened at an inconvenient time.
@kahn: Very interesting test!

On my test ride, the assistance significantly dropped below 10% of the Range Extender. When the RE charge went down to 5%, the value changed to 0 on the Wahoo, and the main battery kicked in.

My attempt was spoilt by the fact that electronic gremlins started using the main battery on my "Discharge RE first" ride somewhere, and 5% of that battery was used in addition to 95% of the Range Extender. To keep it simple: Realistic RE range at 66/66% for Vado SL on a windy day has been 30 km. That would be 60 km for the internal battery, all safety factors taken into account. The energy consumption of 5 Wh/km is high as for Vado SL but that allows me riding fast enough to join some group rides. (As I would own two REs, I might even try to increase assistance some more if the trip wouldn't exceed 100 km)
 
@Rider51: I have replaced the Vado SL stem with Redshift ShockStop with these dimensions:
  • Length: 100 mm
  • Angle: +6 degrees
Ideas? Flip or not?

(Vibration dampening of Redshift is excellent. Now, let us talk about the riding position).


Doug, I hate that, too. Yet the Autumn winds and the air drag is what I hate even more...
If you flip a +6 stem, you will be 20mm lower with a 7mm longer reach. This site gives a good visual comparison:

 
Back