Sierratim
Well-Known Member
- Region
- USA
- City
- Nevada City, CA & Paradise Valley, AZ
I certainly agree about bike comfort, but I can't agree re differences with motor power and torque, unless you're in an area with few hills. Aside from the data, we test rode a Como with the 1.2e motor on our local hills. It just didn't have enough 'punch'. The 1.2 motor was noticeably stronger on the same hills. On a flat run, there wasn't really any difference.The difference in posture between the Como and Vado is not going to make a marked difference in climbing a hill. A suspension fork on the Como is unnecessary as there is not that much weight on the front wheel. Better not to have it to save weight and simplicity. The Como does benefit from adding a suspension seatpost. The power and torque differences between the 3 and 4 won’t matter. Most people don’t ride in max power settings and none of these will last 60 km if you do the whole ride in turbo mode. I was planning to buy the 3 but bought the 4 on sale.
Most important consideration is how comfortable are you on the bike. That doesn’t necessarily mean sitting more upright; it has to do with what works for you. I love the Como geometry;it is really not an extreme upright position.