Why did you accept a used eBike from them?
They were sold that way. Costco sells the Sondors bikes in their warehouses. Costco accepts returns for any reason and sent the returns back to Sondors, who then sold them as used, as-is for only $500. Myself personally as a consumer, I would have never touched a deal like that as there's no telling what some jackass has done to the bike. While it seems that many were fine excepting a minor niggle here and there, others had significant flaws. If it was my decision I certainly would have tried to do more investigation. Maybe they did and some things were not readily obvious? I have no idea. I don't work for them but I have been an admin on the main Sondors discussion group for many years, so I see quite a bit behind the scenes.
Do you know that Sondors uses their customers as their bank? The don't place an order until they have a container sold. With the mid drives, they didn't even design them until they had a container sold. No one knew the weight or other specs until the container was sold.
This is all patently false. You made all this up.
The don't place an order until they have a container sold
False. The bikes are queue'd into a factory build list as the online orders come in. What is true is they don't
ship until there is a full container. Sondors will fill a container thats only partially full with supplemental, unsold orders so the container will go out and not sit. Those bikes will be sold as in-stock on the Sondors site, which means near-immediate ship once an order is placed. But there aren't many of these so it is a mighty short window to get in on that, and there's no warning for when it happens. My own Sondors Original was one of these and I waited 7 whole days from ordering to delivery (I had no connection with them at that time I just got lucky).
With the mid drives, they didn't even design them until they had a container sold
False. The Facebook group was made aware of the mid drives and shown early and later prototypes for what must have been a 2 year period during their lonnnng gestation. I personally saw evolving, behind-the-scenes prototypes as they were delivered to Southern California and tested. Along with the rest of the FB staff, I was given a detailed look at what was thought to be the production-ready final design. I went ape over its use of a freewheel, made my case as to why it was bad and pitched hard for a 9s cassette, which at the time was the de facto DIY standard vs. a strong motor like the Ultra. Sondors ended up taking this and other suggestions to heart and stopped the release of the Rockstar to upgrade that bike to a SRAM 11s cassette, which in hindsight is a better drivetrain. Because that change involved completely changing the dropout spacing, the entire rear frame assembly had to be redesigned, which is why that model arrived on US shores months after the Cruiser and LX.
This is a publicly-released pic of the first prototype of the Rockstar. Quite a difference even from the later prototypes. Thats a BBS02 (based on the chainring) buttoned up inside of a frame case if I'm not mistaken.
This is a very late prototype. So late that this render was done for sales use on the web site as a production model, and it was missed when the site went live for a short time. I can share it cuz it was public. Note the M600 motor. All other elements are very close to the final design, and I am pretty sure this version was the source of the bad (lower) published weight.
No one knew the weight or other specs until the container was sold.
False. The component specs simply weren't published on the web site prior to release (There WAS a list made available on the FB group). They DID get the weight wrong. The long (long!) design phase of the bike meant there were several versions. Until almost the end, the bike had an M600 motor (at the time, photos on the web site still showed the M600 even, and the battery was originally much smaller). Somehow the weight never got updated by the factory and the change was missed until someone who owned one put it on a scale. This was a mistake on Sondors' part for sure, and it is not the only time weight was gotten wrong (I can think of two other times and the reasons it happened were different).
Its ok to be down on a company. Criticism can be fair and well-placed. God knows Sondors has made plenty of customer service mistakes over the years. But that is no excuse for making things up because you hate something or someone.