Cameron Newland
Well-Known Member
I know they aren't in the same class. It's just the 2 bikes that I am looking at. Along with the Rad Rover. I wish I could test drive one but there isn't any dealers around here. I just really wish I could ride one of each to see how much effort I would have to exert to get it to go up hills and just to keep it at speed. I have bad knees even though I am only 28. I am not over weight at all and my job keeps me super active. I want to get on the bike and just cruise. Minimal effort, throttle would probably be used a ton. I could always get a throttle for the CC, but the smaller motor got me worried about hills. This is where the City/rover comes in with the 750w motor and throttle that it has already. This is my dilemma.
The CrossCurrent is likely a superior climber than the RadCity because the CC has a geared hub motor, whereas the RadCity has a direct-drive hub motor that is more efficient at higher speeds but dreadfully inefficient when climbing at lower speeds. The CC likely produces a lot more torque at the wheel than the RadCity. Also, the CC's peak power output is somewhere around 900W – 350W is just its continuous output rating.
I own a 500W rear hub motor (direct drive) ebike and I can tell you that it's not so good at climbing really steep hills, whereas my girlfriend's EasyMotion Evo Street is equipped with a 350W geared hub motor and easily beats my 500W direct-drive hub motor up hills.