Long term, real world information about any particular bike brand and model can be found in this site's section titled "Discussion by Brand & User Reviews.I've been reading reviews on this site and cant find a negative one. Are there any poorly designed poorly built poorly equipped bikes?
On most of the reviews I watch there is commentary on the general level of the major components such as the drive train, motor, shifters and brakes. Also remember to check the full written review for additional details or you may have missed something in the video as all the talk often is more a conversation than structured review. Some times they will just say though the component series and assume the ready knows the general level os the various series.Certainly the level of quality of components could be commented on.......even if they are termed entry level, mid level quality, high quality. I see huge numbers of bikes with generic low level set ups being marketed as high quality.......and I sincerely doubt that.
They still have that problem. Car magazines were the most infamous of touting each new car as the best ever built. But anyone who bought a car soon learns of it's fail points; things you'll never see in a car mag cause for the most part, car mags don't do long term ownership followups. So those writers are always stepping into a factory fresh or factory-special tuned press car for all of them to rave over.Print magazines used to have this problem too. American Rifleman had a short op-ed about it many years ago. The gist of it was to say that there is only so much author time and magazine space.
From the point of an author, why would they want to spend time with something that was conspicuously bad? From the magazine point of view, why would they want to devote scarce pages to something that was bad, particularly when there is so much good that they can't get to it all?
The only magazines that frequently pan products are computer gaming magazines.
The short answer is yesI've been reading reviews on this site and cant find a negative one. Are there any poorly designed poorly built poorly equipped bikes?
The low end Shimano stuff works pretty well. I would be concerned with getting consumable parts like brake pads and olives and inserts for the no name Chinese hydraulic brakes on some these bikes. However, they may be compatible with Shimano parts. I haven't really looked into it. You can always replace parts, but if the frame is bulky and heavy there is nothing you can do to change that.Another thing to do is look at the parts the bike is made of. while that's not a end all it can be helpful in determining if it's any good.
Other than axles breaking (6 speed) and bearing race coming unscrewed dropping balls on the road ( 7 speed). no locknut. 8 speed, I've had no trouble in 7800 miles. On broken axle, I weighed an enormous 180 lb and don't jump curbs or picnic tables.The low end Shimano stuff works pretty well.
Just a word of cation Shimano does have some stuff that is at the bottom of there barrel that is junk but they also have stuff that's on other end of the scale and everything between. Also there some cases where you can't just upgrade parts so keep that in mind.The low end Shimano stuff works pretty well. I would be concerned with getting consumable parts like brake pads and olives and inserts for the no name Chinese hydraulic brakes on some these bikes. However, they may be compatible with Shimano parts. I haven't really looked into it. You can always replace parts, but if the frame is bulky and heavy there is nothing you can do to change that.