I am worried that there is a misunderstanding of the reported battery life (in charge cycles) vs capacity implicit in a number of peoples post here.
This is a premise regarding # of charges for lifecycle that seems to be true for 99% of the e-bikes companies out there.
As I have ordered a Juice bike and this is their forum let me point out this implicit premise with the following question using the following Juiced setup/premise:
For the RCS with 48V battery, Juiced shows "600 charge cycles to 60%"
- Therefore after ~600 charge cycles with the provided stock charger, how much usable capacity should you expect your battery to have?
If you answered "approximately 60% capacity", then your expectations of battery lifecycle are properly set.
If you were thinking that 600 charges = a loss of 5-10% capacity....
..Then you were thinking this was a Tesla where they sell you a Capacity X but provide you with a larger battery because they enforce the capacity at the bottom and the top - thus after a few years most Tesla's have lost less than 10% of max capacity.
So a Cycle Satiator is a charger that can be used to baby your battery pack. If you baby it, don't charge too fast, don't charge to high, don't discharge to low, don't store at high power.. then you can slow down that battery degradation.
So "600 charge cycles to 60%" means that all things being equal and using the provided 48V charger then after 600 charges your battery pack will have degraded below 60% max capacity.
Note: This 600 to 60% isn't specific to Juiced bikes. From what I can tell, this is more based on the published lifecycle behaviors of the induvial batteries.
I just don't want someone to get the Cycle Satiator and come back here 3 years later complaining that after 1200 charges they are only getting 76% capacity.
If you all knew this already, then I apologize for wasting your time.