JRA
Well-Known Member
Average speed is a benchmark of sorts in the bicycle world and you see it bandied about often here and elsewhere. I know I always go for that figure at the end of a ride to see what it says, but I really am more interested in my wh/mi figure and keeping that in the mid teens as that relates to how far I can go on a charge and speed, terrain and the elements all play a part in it. As an example here are the stats from my ride today which was on fairly flat terrain, mostly pavement but about 8 miles of gravel and a nice breeze.
Over time this has settled in to pretty much the norm for me and my style of riding which includes active pedaling at all times. I usually feel pretty good about a 20.7 average speed but after reading about the Dirty Kanza 200 mile gravel race that took place this weekend in Emporia, KS the ability of a fit rider really puts it in perspective
The "Pace" is his average speed from start to finish including any comfort or food breaks. Very impressive considering the terrain being exclusively gravel. But another impressive figure to me was the psi he was running his tires at:
"Stephens is a member of the Panaracer Gravel Team, so naturally he was running Panaracer tires – opting for 700 x 40c GravelKing SKs. Set up tubeless on 28mm wide Stan’s NoTubes Avion wheels, apparently tires pressures were set at 26.5 psi for the front and 29.5 psi for the rear"
There has always been the belief that you must run high psi in your tires to decrease rolling resistance and get the best speed/mileage but with the advent of the use of wider rims along with wider tires it seems like that is being challenged. Tubeless also plays a big part in the equation also.
I have been using a similar setup since I built up my silver bike last year and find that due to the extra weight, at 41 lbs. probably close to twice the weight of a race bike, I can run in the low 30's dependably but usually at least 35 psi.. I still get decent speed/distance and the increase in absorption of road surfaces like gravel and crappy pavé and traction are what really make it work for me.
Also keep in mind that the above race was in the Flint Hills of KS notoriously known for flatting tires, flint was what the natives made arrows out of after all so flat protection is enhanced as well due to the sealant involved. I know that since using tubeless I have not experienced any flats whereas on my other bike with tubes it is kind of a crap shoot, especially trying to run low psi.
I think that tubeless technology has gotten to the point where there is no reason that e bikes should not benefit from it and I hope that soon the manufacturers will spec it on their bikes. Unfortunately it is kind of expensive to switch over as you need new rims and tires but if they came at the OEM level the cost would not be much if at all more. And you can still run tubes if you want and carry one in case of flats.
Over time this has settled in to pretty much the norm for me and my style of riding which includes active pedaling at all times. I usually feel pretty good about a 20.7 average speed but after reading about the Dirty Kanza 200 mile gravel race that took place this weekend in Emporia, KS the ability of a fit rider really puts it in perspective
The "Pace" is his average speed from start to finish including any comfort or food breaks. Very impressive considering the terrain being exclusively gravel. But another impressive figure to me was the psi he was running his tires at:
"Stephens is a member of the Panaracer Gravel Team, so naturally he was running Panaracer tires – opting for 700 x 40c GravelKing SKs. Set up tubeless on 28mm wide Stan’s NoTubes Avion wheels, apparently tires pressures were set at 26.5 psi for the front and 29.5 psi for the rear"
There has always been the belief that you must run high psi in your tires to decrease rolling resistance and get the best speed/mileage but with the advent of the use of wider rims along with wider tires it seems like that is being challenged. Tubeless also plays a big part in the equation also.
I have been using a similar setup since I built up my silver bike last year and find that due to the extra weight, at 41 lbs. probably close to twice the weight of a race bike, I can run in the low 30's dependably but usually at least 35 psi.. I still get decent speed/distance and the increase in absorption of road surfaces like gravel and crappy pavé and traction are what really make it work for me.
Also keep in mind that the above race was in the Flint Hills of KS notoriously known for flatting tires, flint was what the natives made arrows out of after all so flat protection is enhanced as well due to the sealant involved. I know that since using tubeless I have not experienced any flats whereas on my other bike with tubes it is kind of a crap shoot, especially trying to run low psi.
I think that tubeless technology has gotten to the point where there is no reason that e bikes should not benefit from it and I hope that soon the manufacturers will spec it on their bikes. Unfortunately it is kind of expensive to switch over as you need new rims and tires but if they came at the OEM level the cost would not be much if at all more. And you can still run tubes if you want and carry one in case of flats.