D
Deleted member 4210
Guest
Just curious if anyone is either considering Solar PV or has already installed it at their home or small business ?
If so why, or if you have already how did the install go and are you satisfied with the result ? Here in Illinois, the Solar PV business has been booming , coincidentally starting right around 5 years ago, when I started my ebike biz.
A lot of it is now incentive driven with decent money from RECs, which the state began offering or improved upon a few years ago thanks to a 'deal' or settlement with a major utility who happens to own nukes that taxpayers funded for that same utility who over ran budgets big time back in the 70's and 80's, and is now trying to keep them afloat financially but is struggling due to so much wind power and solar PV that has been artificially subsidized. Theoretically grid tied solar in right proportions could be a good marriage with nukes, but when a utility messes up their operation, over uses coal plants for decades, sells those off, and then bilks ratepayers and tax payers again, with warped rate schedules, that theory goes up in smoke. Our rates are actually not horrible, not the cheapest, but certainly nothing close to California or Hawaii.
So economically , even with RECS, it's a fairly long payback. The jury is still out on whether it truly would help home value. Being grid tied means you can send excess back and get more money, so you could oversize a bit, and get better paybacks, which I think many are doing here.
Environmentally is it the right thing to do ? Depends how long panels really last, and what happens during the mining of materials for panels themselves and disposal, since there is a lot of toxic materials involved. Our state has one of the highest percentages of nukes and gas, and had shutdown much of it's coal plants. Now has a lot of very high efficiency combined cycle gas fired generation, often used to handle demand peaks.
Anyhoo, just curious what others are contemplating or actually doing ? If battery storage is added to the equation, and electronically cleaner power can be had, versus brown out laden grid power that's definitely appealing. On it's own not enough to cough up some big bucks. I'm actually solar PV certified to do audits, so people can determine viability for their home or business, but never pursued any money making endeavor. It was more just to learn the ins and outs that I took the course work, got certified, and met a great instructor who has one of those now booming solar PV install businesses here in the state.
P.s. electric cars could actually help 'save' the nukes, since they can be charged at night, suck a lot of power, and nukes are really bad for having to run at part load, which happens since so much less power is consumed at night. Evs could really smooth out that valley if we ever got enough of them. But by then these ancient nukes here would be long retired. Doubt any new ones will ever be built.
If so why, or if you have already how did the install go and are you satisfied with the result ? Here in Illinois, the Solar PV business has been booming , coincidentally starting right around 5 years ago, when I started my ebike biz.
A lot of it is now incentive driven with decent money from RECs, which the state began offering or improved upon a few years ago thanks to a 'deal' or settlement with a major utility who happens to own nukes that taxpayers funded for that same utility who over ran budgets big time back in the 70's and 80's, and is now trying to keep them afloat financially but is struggling due to so much wind power and solar PV that has been artificially subsidized. Theoretically grid tied solar in right proportions could be a good marriage with nukes, but when a utility messes up their operation, over uses coal plants for decades, sells those off, and then bilks ratepayers and tax payers again, with warped rate schedules, that theory goes up in smoke. Our rates are actually not horrible, not the cheapest, but certainly nothing close to California or Hawaii.
So economically , even with RECS, it's a fairly long payback. The jury is still out on whether it truly would help home value. Being grid tied means you can send excess back and get more money, so you could oversize a bit, and get better paybacks, which I think many are doing here.
Environmentally is it the right thing to do ? Depends how long panels really last, and what happens during the mining of materials for panels themselves and disposal, since there is a lot of toxic materials involved. Our state has one of the highest percentages of nukes and gas, and had shutdown much of it's coal plants. Now has a lot of very high efficiency combined cycle gas fired generation, often used to handle demand peaks.
Anyhoo, just curious what others are contemplating or actually doing ? If battery storage is added to the equation, and electronically cleaner power can be had, versus brown out laden grid power that's definitely appealing. On it's own not enough to cough up some big bucks. I'm actually solar PV certified to do audits, so people can determine viability for their home or business, but never pursued any money making endeavor. It was more just to learn the ins and outs that I took the course work, got certified, and met a great instructor who has one of those now booming solar PV install businesses here in the state.
P.s. electric cars could actually help 'save' the nukes, since they can be charged at night, suck a lot of power, and nukes are really bad for having to run at part load, which happens since so much less power is consumed at night. Evs could really smooth out that valley if we ever got enough of them. But by then these ancient nukes here would be long retired. Doubt any new ones will ever be built.
Last edited by a moderator: