I've just made a comparison of two very similar 100+ rides on a very similar route.
Vado SL 4.0
- Actual batteries' charge: 450 Wh (degraded main battery and degraded Range Extender)
- Ambient temperature: 24-34 C (hot summer)
- Wind: 17 km/h (windy conditions)
- Assistance: SL 40/100%
- Weighted average rider's power: 80 W
- Average speed: 21.9 km/h
- Distance: 113 km
- Elevation gain: 317 m
- Moving time: 5 h 10 min
- Calories: 1,316 kcal
Vado 6.0
- Actual battery charge: 493 Wh (degraded)
- Ambient temperature: 9-14 C (autumn)
- Wind: 4 km/h (calm conditions)
- Assistance: Full power 20/50%
- Weighted average rider's power: 81 W
- Average speed: 21.5 km/h
- Distance: 108 km
- Elevation gain: 300 m
- Moving time: 5 h 2 min
- Calories: 1,293 kcal
In both cases, I returned home still with some useful battery charge. As you can see, the ride on a heavy Vado 6.0 was actually
slower than it was on a Vado SL! (This can be attributed to +10 kg of Vado 6.0 weight compared to the SL). However, both rides were done with comparable rider's power and assistance
turned out to be very similar.
Having said the above, I can state a Vado SL 2 6.0 Carbon non-EQ could be a replacement for my two e-bikes. 47 mm tyres on SL 2 are what I use today on my 6.0. I could equip the SL 2 with Ortlieb Quick Rack and wide SKS mudguards. (I really hesitate when it comes to a kickstand, though!) The e-bike would be still lightweight enough to carry it over terrain obstacles. Only I am afraid of the CF frame and components, bearing in mind all my crashes of the past...