Captain Slow
Well-Known Member
I own both a Juiced CCS and a Specialized Creo.What's really funny is that you seem to think Specialized aren't mass produced! C'mon... Do you actually think they are being assembled in a small craftsman's attic by hand or something?
It has already been said; the individual components used are what make the real distinction between the manufacturers and within that paradigm I would argue that the differences aren't substantial enough for the majority to warrant the 2X-3Xs (10X?) price increase to own a "high end" bike.
Prove to us that you get $3-4k more value out of your "high end" bike than that $2k Juiced. A fiend of mine has 4500 miles on his and loves it.
I've had the Juiced just over 2 years and I've ridden around 8,000 km's on it. I've had the Creo about 3 weeks and ridden it 400 km's.
Not really enough time to conclude for my sample size of 1 that one is higher quality than the other. But there are things like the componentry, the Juiced came was lower level components, I think Alivio or similar. Anyhow way lower than the Specialized which came with Ultegra level components. No surprise the shifting is much better on the Specialized. I have to say that the brakes on the CCS are really good. I've had cars pull out of spots and completely cut me off and I've had to slam on the brakes and I can't imagine brakes being any better.
The fenders on the CCS are crappy and get knocked out of position easily. I had rubbing issues which I resolved by just going from a 45 mm wide tire to a 40 mm tire. I wanted narrower anyways so it didn't bother me. The CCS feels heavy and ponderous compared to the Creo but that's not really a quality difference and more the type of bike.
What I find really interesting is that the CCS comes with a 614 wh battery and the Creo comes with a 320 wh battery. However the range of the Creo is far greater than the CCS. I can easily do over 100 km's on the Creo, that's not the case with the CCS, not even close.