bigalgeorge
New Member
Hi all. Since the modern trend seems to be tending to cassette rather that freewheel, I was considering asking for a change of my imports from FW to CS. CS availability of 11T is common, which is more suited to 20" rear wheel size.
However the tech guy from Suntek (a large China supplier of bike parts) said quote On E-BIKE, we use more Freewheel than Cassette, it is better on repairing and it is stabler. unquote. Translation, they have less problems with FW. I have yet to try my chainwheel 52t and FW 13-15-17-19-21-24-34 but it should be pretty close to whats needed. If low is too high, then I have to revert to FW.
Anyway, interested in anyones thoughts on reliability of the different formats. As for his comments I dont understand what he means is better for repairing though; surely a FW is harder to remove and dont you just chuck them away and replace?
Cheers, Al.
However the tech guy from Suntek (a large China supplier of bike parts) said quote On E-BIKE, we use more Freewheel than Cassette, it is better on repairing and it is stabler. unquote. Translation, they have less problems with FW. I have yet to try my chainwheel 52t and FW 13-15-17-19-21-24-34 but it should be pretty close to whats needed. If low is too high, then I have to revert to FW.
Anyway, interested in anyones thoughts on reliability of the different formats. As for his comments I dont understand what he means is better for repairing though; surely a FW is harder to remove and dont you just chuck them away and replace?
Cheers, Al.