Jeremy McCreary
Well-Known Member
- Region
- USA
- City
- Carlsbad, CA
That's what I was trying to tell you and @Ebikelife72. When you are climbing, your body tries to produce more leg output. If your M is set to 100, the motor will dynamically respond to your demand by producing more power exactly when you need it! In such case, the E should be set to reflect the rider's leg power capacity (the stronger the reader, the less E but do not go below 30% really).
Practical difference between assist modes 60/60 and 60/100 on the SL1?
To see, I used my interactive Specialized PAS model to graph out motor power (Pm) as a function of rider power (Pr) in both modes and compared the graphs.
Graph for 60/60 mode: Rider power (Pr) plots on the x-axis, mechanical power at the crank on the y-axis. The blue plot is motor power (Pm) as a function of Pr. Note its "ramp and flat" structure.
The purple plot is total power at the crank (Pt = Pr + Pm) versus Pr. The red plot, y = Pr, shows the rider's contribution to Pt. For steadily increasing Pr, the blue and purple plots would also reflect Pm and Pt over time.
The orange vertical always marks Prs, the saturation rider power at which Pm "saturates" — i.e., stops increasing with Pr. At any Pr above Prs, any increase in Pt will be due to the rider alone.
The gray vertical marks a particular Pr of interest (Pri). We'll use it to mark Pri = 200W and see how Pm and Pt change there. Note the relative positions of the orange and gray verticals in 60/60 mode. The motor is already saturated at Pri = 200W. But it won't be in 60/100 mode, and the orange-gray arrangement will change to reflect that.
Adjustable model parameters: Px = 240W is the highest mechanical power the SL1's motor can deliver. B = 1.8 is this motor's boost factor. These values are baked into the SL1.
Variables E and M are respectively the ease and (accessible) motor power settings applied as a pair when the rider selects an assist mode like ECO or SPORT. Both run from 0 to 100. In writing 60/60 and 60/100 for our assist modes of interest, we've already been using the accepted E/M shorthand.
The product (E / 100) • B sets the slope of the Pm ramp, while the saturation motor power Ps = (M / 100) • Px sets the height of the Pm flat.
The Pm ramp and flat always meet at the orange vertical marking Prs. In any mode like 60/60 or 35/35 with M = E, Prs = Px / B = 133W. This value is also baked into the SL1.
Now for 60/100 mode
Below I repeated the 60/60 graph and then put the 60/100 graph below it for comparison. Their underlying Px, B, E, and Pri parameters are the same.
Graph for 60/100 mode: Since E and B are unchanged, the Pm ramp has the same slope as before. But the Pm flat is now higher and starts at farther to the right at higher Pr. In fact, Pm and Pt are higher in 60/100 mode than in 60/60 at any Pr above the 60/60 Prs of 133W. This is one major difference between the two modes.
In 60/100 mode, the motor now saturates at Prs = 222W, well beyond the 60/60 Prs of 133W. To get to the Pm flat now, you'll have to work much harder. Our reference Pri of 200W is now just short of saturation.
At any Pr > 222W, Pm will be constant at Ps, and any further increase in Pt will have to come from the rider, as no additional Pm will be forthcoming.
Am I saturated yet?
Easy to tell if you're monitoring Pr on the TCU or in the app: If Pr > 133W on an SL1 in any M = E assist mode, you're already saturated.
To get more Pm once saturated — say, on a hill — you'll have to change to a mode with a higher M and accept the E that comes with it. Micro Tune lets you adjust M in steps of 10 with M = E at each step.
If you're in a mode with M > E, as in 35/70 or 60/100, and can do fractions in your head, your Prs will be (M / E) • 133W. Since modes with M < E are rarely used, this Prs will generally be harder than 133W.
So if M is twice E for any M, as in 35/70, you'll saturate at Prs = 2 • 133W = 266W. If you don't want to work that hard to get all the help the motor will give at your chosen M, find a way to reduce M / E.
This could be a reason to prefer a 35/50 ECO mode over a 35/70. You'd get an easier Prs of 190W and a smaller saturation motor power (lower Pm flat) than in 35/70, but it would also be easier on the battery.
Last edited: