Specialized Creo SL Expert versus Giant Road-e Pro?

[Saratoga Dave]

I reviewed this thread again when it popped up today and paid more attention the location: West Virginia. My Captain at the police department‘s father was an original WV guy from the Hurricane area and always said that if you flattened out West Virginia it would be bigger than Texas. Ain’t no hills in WV, just straight up and straight down. Sort of argues against the Creo in that sense, perhaps. Did you make a decision so far?

I have A/Fib so I am familiar with the fun that can be had when my heart goes over that 150 threshold. Not so good, unfortunately.

 

[wrshultz]

I reviewed this thread again when it popped up today and paid more attention the location: West Virginia. My Captain at the police department‘s father was an original WV guy from the Hurricane area and always said that if you flattened out West Virginia it would be bigger than Texas. Ain’t no hills in WV, just straight up and straight down. Sort of argues against the Creo in that sense, perhaps. Did you make a decision so far?

I have A/Fib so I am familiar with the fun that can be had when my heart goes over that 150 threshold. Not so good, unfortunately.

Thanks for your response. Yes; West Virginia doesn't have mountains, but we have lots of steep hills. No, I haven't made up my mind yet, but I'm leaning toward ordering a Creo SL Expert. I was fortunate enough to have a LBS that let me test ride a Creo E5 on a 30 mile regular route with our riding group. My observations were as follows:
1. The Creo doesn't have as much overall power as the Giant Road-e.
2. The Creo can be ridden with the assist off on flat roads, which is very hard to do on the 44 lb. Giant Road-e. I rode 10 miles (flats and downhills) with no assist, and remaining 20 miles in Sport (level 2). I used Eco (level 1) only for a short time, and never used Turbo (level 3).
3. The Creo (even the E5 aluminum frame model) is much lighter than the Giant, and you can feel it in the bike's handling.
4. I had to use Sport (assist level 2) on the longer and steeper climbs with the Creo, where I normally use the Eco (lowest of 5 assist levels) on the Giant.
5. I also had to use Sport (assist level 2) on faster sections of flat and rolling roads when the group pace got above 20 mph. I would struggle under this circumstance on the Giant, (because being a Canadian model) the assist would cut of at 20 mph.
6. I found the factory Eco (lowest assist) on the Creo, really doesn't help very much in our riding terrain.
7. Didn't really ride it enough to tell about battery life, but it appears the Creo will need the Range Extender on most rides in our area over 55-60 miles.

I'm willing to try the Creo; because I think it will be more like riding an analog bike, with assist when I need it. I also think it will be more fun on group rides. It will make me work harder and become a stronger rider (up to a HR restricted level).

My seat of the pants 2 cents worth on the comparison. Thanks to all that contributed to the thread!

Bill

 

[jodi2]

2. The Creo can be ridden with the assist off on flat roads, which is very hard to do on the 44 lb. Giant Road-e. I rode 10 miles (flats and downhills) with no assist, and remaining 20 miles in Sport (level 2). I used Eco (level 1) only for a short time, and never used Turbo (level 3).
6. I found the factory Eco (lowest assist) on the Creo, really doesn't help very much in our riding terrain.
7. Didn't really ride it enough to tell about battery life, but it appears the Creo will need the Range Extender on most rides in our area over 55-60 miles.

I think you underestimate level1. On my long 68 mile ride with others (slightly fitter and much fitter) I used mostly level1 and in the last part I even tuned level1 down to 25% in the app, that's 60W. Very rarely I used level2 and to my suprise left everyone behind. If you really need level2/more than 100W allday to keep up with others you may just have a bad day or the others are really really fit/professionals. Only riding alone I tend to use to much level2/to much motor support uphill, as I want to leave the hills behind. If I ride with others I realize that level2 is mostly already unnatural/"superhuman".
At least uphill this is my experience (our motor limit here is 25km/h or 16mph), but the important thing should be the power/the watts, not the speed.

Your range estimation is right I think, in mostly level2 you may not reach 55-60 miles only with the main battery. But in level1 (which is enough for longer rides with others I still believe...) you will. The good thing ist, you are not in a hurry, you don't have to decide anything now. Take a Creo and if you find out after a while that the main battery is not enough for you, buy the Extender. But keep in mind that's it's only +50%/160Wh extra, not +85%/209Wh or +100%/250Wh like some other assist drives like Fazua or X.35 with smaller main battery.

 

[abercrombie]

My first eBike was the Giant Quick+ E with the main difference with the Road e being fenders and drop bar. My second eBike was the Creo just purchased late last year.

Aside from the power, which has been discussed prior in this thread is the feel of aluminum vs. carbon. Often, my hands and feet would feel the brunt of going over bumps at high speed. It even may have resulted in micro-fractures since at times after a riding on the Giant, it felt like I hurt my ankle. Overall, my whole body would feel more beat up riding the eBike than my normal analog carbon bike. The Creo is more like the analog carbon bike in terms of compliance. I can ride full speed over bumps and my body won't pay the price.

Still have the Giant which I have loaded with saddle bags for errands, but it's probably the last aluminum frame + aluminum fork that I ever buy.