pushkar
Well-Known Member
Given that the Rolhoff is the most expensive component on the bike. Who is responsible for servicing it is crucial. Most of the time when you buy something the manufacturer is fully responsible for all the components. If I take my Mercedes in for service and the alternator has crapped out, I don't have to deal with Bosch about it. Mercedes service handles it.
I wonder if manufacturer's like Rise & Muller have an agreement with Rohoff that Rohloff takes care of servicing their product even when it is incorporated into R&M's bike. Regardless of the arrangement, Riese & Muller will suffer as a result of Rohloff's failure to adequately support their product. R&M should be taking affirmative action to protect their own reputation at this point.
I don't know how the RM & Rohloff agreement is structured and I don't want to guess. I can tell you that with our contract, Rohloff is very specific - Watt Wagons has to provide replacement /parts on our end, and RMA with Rohloff as needed. (Slight digression.... to meet this service threshold, we constantly apprise our customers about hub limits, Dos / Donts, to minimize issues. I dont know if others do that, but we do.)
From a consumer's point of view, this is an unacceptable breakdown in service and support for an expensive, high end product.
Great point. I believe every OE tries to service their customers (some better than others ). That being said, I can absolutely see why some cases may slip through. I don't have a good answer for you on why that happens. However I do want to share that scaling customer service is significantly harder, esp if there is no local presence.
/start sales pitch.
You make excellent points. I went through your post history, and I know you have been a loyal customer and user for the brands you ride. We cant promise miracles, but if you are ever in the market for a high end bike, with excellent parts, and equally awesome customer support, we would love to build you one!
/end sales pitch.