No motorized vehicles allowed

some thoughts:

1. What if you turn of the motor ether by turning the whole system of or just setting it to off and use the odometer? I would assume that it suddenly turn to a non electric bike for all legal purposes?

2. at least in Europe all ebikes with a max of 25 km/h are considered bikes with the same rules and responsibilities as to any other bike and max 45 km/h e-bikes are considered mopeds.



P.s. john peck I really like your gas powered bike, I am thinking about building something similar to see if I can challenge the stupid EU rules about max 25 km/h being bikes, I go faster then that with my non electric bike but can't hold it for as long. Apparently some people locally buy the max 45 km/h bikes de-register them and removing the plates, and then just ride around on it like it was a max 25 km/h bike
 
My bike could pass for an acoustic bike as the battery is inside the tube and it has a teenie control pad. It probably won't be this year. The weather is supposed to go to winter tonight in that part of the country, and in the mountains around my part.
 
It makes little sense to place trail rules based on "motorized" or "non-motorized". Safety to other riders and pedestrians should be the goal. If you are going to regulate vehicles on trails, do it by size/weight and set rules around speed. That way there is no nebulous questions about what is "motorized" or not.
 
It makes little sense to place trail rules based on "motorized" or "non-motorized". Safety to other riders and pedestrians should be the goal. If you are going to regulate vehicles on trails, do it by size/weight and set rules around speed. That way there is no nebulous questions about what is "motorized" or not.
xacly! motorized wheelchairs are hardly a threat.
 
Time to recognize ebikes as agedness handicap devices. Just look at the % of codgers onsite here !

That would make sense, however laws generally don't require common sense to be enacted. LOL

California has a lot of trails - the popular areas frequented by a lot of mountain bikers, where ebikes are not specifically allowed, are where the conflicts arise. Regular mountain bikers REALLY don't want ebikes on 'their' trails. And the USFS still classifies ebikes as 'motorized vehichles' and thus are prohibited on hiking and biking trails. BLM and Federal Parks have opened up their areas to ebikes, except where specifically prohibited. This followed the order that came down from Washington DC last year.

The less popular areas are simply not ridden much, nor patrolled, so you can get away with riding an ebike in those areas. If LEO catches you, or someone complains, you may well get a citation, or simply be asked to leave the area.

And all of the routes and trails that ARE open to motorized - ATV's and motorcycles - allow ebikes. So lots of USFS routes are included in this - thousands of miles.

What is sad to me, is the push-back from mountain bikers on ebikes. I get it, they've lobbied and worked hard to get access to hiking and equestrian trails, and their fear is not so much the Class-1 ebikes, but the people that will take Class 3 and more and ride them like motorcycles. And any area where they have access that is not specifically allowed, more like grandfathered use, that is at risk of shutting down, the fear that ebikes will exacerbate that risk is real.

OTOH, all of the arguments for noise and speed are hogwash - simply defenses. The fear is for people that will abuse their access with over-watted bikes and risky behaviors.

I'm on the cusp of buying a pedal mountain bike for those trails where ebikes are prohibited. It just opens up new riding opportunities and access. Best of both worlds. Besides, I can get wifey to haul my a$$ up the mountain in the pickup so I can ride a pedal bike down. :cool:
 
That would make sense, however laws generally don't require common sense to be enacted. LOL

California has a lot of trails - the popular areas frequented by a lot of mountain bikers, where ebikes are not specifically allowed, are where the conflicts arise. Regular mountain bikers REALLY don't want ebikes on 'their' trails. And the USFS still classifies ebikes as 'motorized vehichles' and thus are prohibited on hiking and biking trails. BLM and Federal Parks have opened up their areas to ebikes, except where specifically prohibited. This followed the order that came down from Washington DC last year.

The less popular areas are simply not ridden much, nor patrolled, so you can get away with riding an ebike in those areas. If LEO catches you, or someone complains, you may well get a citation, or simply be asked to leave the area.

And all of the routes and trails that ARE open to motorized - ATV's and motorcycles - allow ebikes. So lots of USFS routes are included in this - thousands of miles.

What is sad to me, is the push-back from mountain bikers on ebikes. I get it, they've lobbied and worked hard to get access to hiking and equestrian trails, and their fear is not so much the Class-1 ebikes, but the people that will take Class 3 and more and ride them like motorcycles. And any area where they have access that is not specifically allowed, more like grandfathered use, that is at risk of shutting down, the fear that ebikes will exacerbate that risk is real.

OTOH, all of the arguments for noise and speed are hogwash - simply defenses. The fear is for people that will abuse their access with over-watted bikes and risky behaviors.

I'm on the cusp of buying a pedal mountain bike for those trails where ebikes are prohibited. It just opens up new riding opportunities and access. Best of both worlds. Besides, I can get wifey to haul my a$$ up the mountain in the pickup so I can ride a pedal bike down. :cool:

I think the old saying used to be, " As goes California, so goes the US". Or something to that effect. I think that has changed. Hopefully. People are starting to realize that a state that can't even keep its power grid up or manage it's forests ... may not exactly be an exemplar of solid policy.
 
I think the old saying used to be, " As goes California, so goes the US". Or something to that effect. I think that has changed. Hopefully. People are starting to realize that a state that can't even keep its power grid up or manage it's forests ... may not exactly be an exemplar of solid policy.

And why it's residents are leaving in droves.
As soon as I can retire we're leaving. I can build a brand new home on acreage in a neighboring state for half of what I have in a 50yo dump here. But it has a pool. 🤣
 
I´ve long operated on the premise that signs are not necessarily the word of God....especially when fishing.
eBikes are allowed in the county parks where I live, but some of the signage still says "no motorized vehicles". They need to update those signs because ebike restrictions have changed in recent years.
 
Ebikes that fall within the state's regulations are not motorized vehicles.

Asking for forgiveness can work for the one ebiker. Asking for permission can work for all ebikers. The more the regulators know the taxpayers want it, the better it is for all of us.
 
That would make sense, however laws generally don't require common sense to be enacted. LOL

California has a lot of trails - the popular areas frequented by a lot of mountain bikers, where ebikes are not specifically allowed, are where the conflicts arise. Regular mountain bikers REALLY don't want ebikes on 'their' trails. And the USFS still classifies ebikes as 'motorized vehichles' and thus are prohibited on hiking and biking trails. BLM and Federal Parks have opened up their areas to ebikes, except where specifically prohibited. This followed the order that came down from Washington DC last year.

The less popular areas are simply not ridden much, nor patrolled, so you can get away with riding an ebike in those areas. If LEO catches you, or someone complains, you may well get a citation, or simply be asked to leave the area.

And all of the routes and trails that ARE open to motorized - ATV's and motorcycles - allow ebikes. So lots of USFS routes are included in this - thousands of miles.

What is sad to me, is the push-back from mountain bikers on ebikes. I get it, they've lobbied and worked hard to get access to hiking and equestrian trails, and their fear is not so much the Class-1 ebikes, but the people that will take Class 3 and more and ride them like motorcycles. And any area where they have access that is not specifically allowed, more like grandfathered use, that is at risk of shutting down, the fear that ebikes will exacerbate that risk is real.

OTOH, all of the arguments for noise and speed are hogwash - simply defenses. The fear is for people that will abuse their access with over-watted bikes and risky behaviors.

I'm on the cusp of buying a pedal mountain bike for those trails where ebikes are prohibited. It just opens up new riding opportunities and access. Best of both worlds. Besides, I can get wifey to haul my a$$ up the mountain in the pickup so I can ride a pedal bike down. :cool:

Seems to me that education is missing. Fear of ebikes is irrational when I get passed by acoustic bikes going 30 mph. Education, education, education.
 
Depends what your state says. In Virginia, an electric bike is defined as vehicles and not motor vehicles. "any device herein defined as a bicycle, electric personal assistive mobility device, electric power-assisted bicycle, or moped shall be deemed not to be a motor vehicle." - Title 46.2

I see "No Motor Vehicles" and know it doesn't apply to e-bikes. There are still ignorant people out there that will tell you otherwise, but I would check with the state first.

Dang. Impressive. And in Virginia. 👈 There is hope.
 
Back