RandallS
Well-Known Member
- Region
- Canada
- City
- Calgary
Here's some more info I got from Louis.
When his fails, the resistance at the cranks is higher than if he'd simply turned assistance down to zero with the bike powered up.
My theory, based on that, is that parts of the system (probably part of the controller circuit) still consider the power to still be "on".
Still sucks - whether I am right or not.
If I had a failing bike - I would not be riding in some of the places I intend to go this summer.
I'm glad they are replacing the bike - that way corporate techs can rip that thing apart and do some proper QC and get to the root of this issue.
When his fails, the resistance at the cranks is higher than if he'd simply turned assistance down to zero with the bike powered up.
My theory, based on that, is that parts of the system (probably part of the controller circuit) still consider the power to still be "on".
Still sucks - whether I am right or not.
If I had a failing bike - I would not be riding in some of the places I intend to go this summer.
I'm glad they are replacing the bike - that way corporate techs can rip that thing apart and do some proper QC and get to the root of this issue.