Buy a bike with a throttle. Most of the 'improvements' are things like auto shifting and more refined pedal assist. A new throttle is 8 bucks.
The typical ebike buyer around here is suffering from physical limitations, generally older, and the level of components is not that pressing.
Why is the bike obsolete? A real advance was mid-drive, because it can use the power more efficiently, and the bike will be better balanced. But if you don't need the hill-climbing capability for what you ride? Maybe people should buy mid-drives, but should they abandon a hub drive just because MD is out there?
I'm hoping people will find bikes in the $800-$1800 range, partly driven by crowdfund bikes, and pay less attention to super-premium bikes with auto-shift, features that double the price. I think the market is served by basic bikes. There are two different worlds, in the US, and the low-margin world is pressing in on the high margin. The high margin world needs to create the illusion of obsolescence more than the low margin seller. There is going to be a lot less marketing.
I like it...But, Court may have trouble keeping sponsors if that thread was created...lol
Interesting thread, how many people have actually negotiated a better deal?
If it's not breaking forum rules be nice to start a new thread where you could post MSRP and what you actually paid for your bike, plus any factors, time of year etc.
Harry
It is the Forum's standard to not bringing shops' prices into this mix. You do not have a clear knowledge of the true cost involved to produce a decent, not cheap, quality ebike. It is not producing facts when it is repeatedly posted on the forum that a price is too high and you 'think' its value is less. That is a subjective observation and only breeds contention. Is there a lack of moderate priced Ebikes, yes. But there are companies who do make these items like Prodeco Tech, X-treme, E-Joe and probably a couple others. I mention these because they are not just a website shipping some uninsured bike with no service, but reputable companies that are invested in providings quality product with consumer protection, parts availablity and technical support. There is no huge ebike company out there yet with the means to market like the Treks & Giants of the regular bike universe. All ebike manufacturers are tiny compared to those. For you folks who are all do-it-yourself type, then go for the webstuff and write about it. The majority of ebike riders are not comfortable with that and really want and need the support of a specially trained shop.I'm not sure why this is such a delicate subject, why can't consumers discuss what they are paying for their ebikes? I think the number one problem with this industry is perceived high pricing. If we act only to preserve msrp, ebikes will never gain market in the US. I only bought my neo xtrem because it was a discounted demo, even then the price was high...msrp in this industry is ridiculous right now.
Not allowing true pricing discussion (between consumers) is a rather near sighted approach that seems to me would protect only a small market from potential growth.
The arguments I am making are not unique to E-bikes, these exact same discussions occur over at the mtbr forum, especially when you boil it down to buying online vs. buying in a shop. Bikes Direct is the devil in the regular bike market, in the same vein that the crowd-funded bikes get treated here by some. The real problem with our market is that it appears none of the larger suppliers is willing (or able?) to play the volume game in a market where bikes are relegated to recreational use. Sounds like that will be continuing presently. I guess we will all have to tote the company line.It is the Forum's standard to not bringing shops' prices into this mix. You do not have a clear knowledge of the true cost involved to produce a decent, not cheap, quality ebike. It is not producing facts when it is repeatedly posted on the forum that a price is too high and you 'think' its value is less. That is a subjective observation and only breeds contention. Is there a lack of moderate priced Ebikes, yes. But there are companies who do make these items like Prodeco Tech, X-treme, E-Joe and probably a couple others. I mention these because they are not just a website shipping some uninsured bike with no service, but reputable companies that are invested in providings quality product with consumer protection, parts availablity and technical support. There is no huge ebike company out there yet with the means to market like the Treks & Giants of the regular bike universe. All ebike manufacturers are tiny compared to those. For you folks who are all do-it-yourself type, then go for the webstuff and write about it. The majority of ebike riders are not comfortable with that and really want and need the support of a specially trained shop.
Chin up Pxpaulx. You are in a good position to buy, just being on this forum and reading/seeing the performance/cost (msrp)=value. There is enough here to find a bike of your preference with sufficient value to you. Anything less than MSRP is just more value.The arguments I am making are not unique to E-bikes, these exact same discussions occur over at the mtbr forum, especially when you boil it down to buying online vs. buying in a shop. Bikes Direct is the devil in the regular bike market, in the same vein that the crowd-funded bikes get treated here by some. The real problem with our market is that it appears none of the larger suppliers is willing (or able?) to play the volume game in a market where bikes are relegated to recreational use. Sounds like that will be continuing presently. I guess we will all have to tote the company line.
You've made some great points @pxpaulx! I would like to echo @Ann M. that you can share information here privately "between consumers" using the messaging feature. Going public however is not welcome because this site is kept alive by sponsors and they mandate MSRP in all communications to help keep their dealers healthy. In short, they mandate a MAP or "minimum advertised price" and because there have been some shop owners advertising here in the forums and others who began to undercut... it created a situation where people were no longer discussing the bikes and technology but instead were racing to the bottom on price. That's just not what this space is about and I think many individuals prefer to keep their financial positions private anyway.I'm not sure why this is such a delicate subject, why can't consumers discuss what they are paying for their ebikes? I think the number one problem with this industry is perceived high pricing. If we act only to preserve msrp, ebikes will never gain market in the US. I only bought my neo xtrem because it was a discounted demo, even then the price was high...msrp in this industry is ridiculous right now.
Not allowing true pricing discussion (between consumers) is a rather near sighted approach that seems to me would protect only a small market from potential growth.
You see Steve, this is where you are all fumble-stuck. You want a free market, open price, invoice cost that will help you (the liberal-me type) get the cheap bike they want, but put a well intended, entrepreneur ebike company in bankruptcy, and allow the big box to survive making cheap/junk ebikes so they meet their price points and sales.When the major players in the industry agree to eliminate MAP and allow retail discounts to be advertised, then the whole conversation will be changed.
I believe this will work in favor of both consumers and sellers as the market exponentially increases.
More volume, more choice, more e-bike riders!
You want a free market, open price, invoice cost that will help you (the liberal-me type) get the cheap bike they want
Free market is "liberal" and MAP protectionism is "conservative"? I think you got it backwards!
Most can agree from a consumer perspective that an open fair market invites competition and resulting growth.