Instead of banning certain members...

Status
Not open for further replies.
I cannot believe Putin is letting His Army get ground up like this, This harkens to something more sinister.It is my hope the Missle commanders will sit on their hands when the launch command comes.
This capacity goes beyond scorched earth, hats off to the brave archeologists who are beginning to believe we have had more time on this Earth than commonly accepted, are we going to get it right this time? Or are we doomed to a cycle of never-ending insanity?
 
uh huh
 

Attachments

  • the boots.jpg
    the boots.jpg
    7.2 KB · Views: 114
neither are antivaxxers or QAnon followers.
Qanoners believe something too stupid to talk about, but I'm not familiar with examples of no tolerance for dissenting opinion.
Generally those mislabeled as "anti-vaxxers" are a mixed bag of people who have very different views from each other, including strong supporters of vaccination in general... so you're misled on that item. Some are simply against anti-constitutional mandates, for example.
 
Last edited:
Qanoners believe something too stupid to talk about, but I'm not familiar with examples of no tolerance for dissenting opinion.
Generally those mislabeled as "anti-vaxxers" are a mixed bag of people who have very different views from each other, including strong supporters of vaccination in general... so you're misled on that item. Some are simply against anti-constitutional mandates, for example.
QAnon is creeping into the Republican Party. Yes I know about antivaxxers been following them for many years. Covid brought them out pdf the woodwork and they threw medicine under the bus. Almost all vaccines are movement mandated and has nothin g to do with the constitution.
 
QAnon is creeping into the Republican Party. Yes I know about antivaxxers been following them for many years. Covid brought them out pdf the woodwork and they threw medicine under the bus. Almost all vaccines are movement mandated and has nothin g to do with the constitution.
Lots of goons and sellouts in both parties, without doubt. So of antivaxxers you can name names. Which prominent antivaxxers do not tolerate dissenting opinions? Thanks.

I said "Some are simply against anti-constitutional mandates, for example." Your reply is not responsive to my statement, which is regarding tolerance of others' opinions.
 
Last edited:
Lots of goons and sellouts in both parties, without doubt. So of antivaxxers you can name names. Which prominent antivaxxers do not tolerate dissenting opinions? Thanks.
no clue its a waste of time trying to understand antivaxxers gave up on that years ago. what I am supposed to pick them out after listening to ours of them saying stupid things not based on science? I will leave that up to you since you swing that way.
 
no clue its a waste of time trying to understand antivaxxers gave up on that years ago. what I am supposed to pick them out after listening to ours of them saying stupid things not based on science? I will leave that up to you since you swing that way.
Well, you strongly claimed something. Now you bow out after also claiming "Yes I know about antivaxxers been following them for many years"
So you have no examples. NOT ONE.. Very well. You're a "no show" to support your own claims made minutes ago.
 
Well, you strongly claimed something. Now you bow out after also claiming "Yes I know about antivaxxers been following them for many years"
So you have no examples. NOT ONE.. Very well. You're a "no show" to support your own claims made minutes ago.
dude I could care less. I have heard way to many stupid claims over the years. its not worth my time. I have seen plenty of claims from you too. I have given up arguing with antivaxxers its like arguing with a rock. I have learned covid started out as a virus became a IQ test.
 
I show both scientific research papers and government sites as my evidence. You have nothing to support your claims but smear tactics. I support anyone taking as many shots as they like,althoughI might offer scientific evidence of effectiveness or lack thereof, or coincidental damages.
them saying stupid things not based on science? I will leave that up to you since you swing that way.
 
dude I could care less. I have heard way to many stupid claims over the years. its not worth my time. I have seen plenty of claims from you too. I have given up arguing with antivaxxers its like arguing with a rock. I have learned covid started out as a virus became a IQ test.
That's fine, but the truth is that you could not support your claims. That is all.
 
That's fine, but the truth is that you could not support your claims. That is all.
the truth is I will not spend the time doing so. its a stupid waste of time and its candy silly you're so invested in it. spend more time riding less time worrying about vaccinations.
 
the truth is I will not spend the time doing so. its a stupid waste of time and its candy silly you're so invested in it. spend more time riding less time worrying about vaccinations.
The truth is that once more you spent time making false claims and smears that you can't support in any way.
The boostered are twice as likely to be a covid case. As always, I provide official source for my claims. Government of Ontario this time.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 14-09-51 COVID-19 vaccinations data.png
    Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 14-09-51 COVID-19 vaccinations data.png
    92.1 KB · Views: 106
If it were a vaccine ( it's NOT ) you and your wife would not have been infected.
So where did you read that all vaccines are 100 percent effective?

Also, the mRNA vaccines are vaccines, they do not provide sterilizing immunity but do prevent serious disease in most cases. This is similar to how flu vaccines, rotavirus vaccines, and even inactivated polio vaccine works.
 
So where did you read that all vaccines are 100 percent effective?

Also, the mRNA vaccines are vaccines, they do not provide sterilizing immunity but do prevent serious disease in most cases. This is similar to how flu vaccines, rotavirus vaccines, and even inactivated polio vaccine works.
What percent fall ill with polio after 3 recent shots?
 

"Two doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) are 90% effective or more against polio; three doses are 99% to 100% effective.

A person is considered to be fully vaccinated if he or she has received:

  • four doses of any combination of IPV and tOPV, or
  • a primary series of at least three doses of IPV or trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (tOPV)
AND

  • The last dose in either series should be given after 4 years of age and at least 6 months after the previous dose.

Duration of Protection​

It is not known how long people who received IPV will be immune to poliovirus, but they are most likely protected for many years after a complete series of IPV."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back