fooferdoggie
Well-Known Member
bullcrap as usual.Statistically, they were the most likely type to become a case.
bullcrap as usual.Statistically, they were the most likely type to become a case.
as usual you don't understand how viruses works. Covid changed at a extremely rapid rate. so your argument is pointless."Two doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) are 90% effective or more against polio; three doses are 99% to 100% effective.
A person is considered to be fully vaccinated if he or she has received:
It is not known how long people who received IPV will be immune to poliovirus, but they are most likely protected for many years after a complete series of IPV."
Since you dont understand yada yada yada. Covid has brought out the google docs in hordes.....since they changed the definition of "vaccine".
Not according to The Government of Ontario official page. Don't be a science denier, now, just because you have an unsupported belief that runs contrary to the science. I presented the graph for you. You can go to the page yourself. I like to use official sources that you can try to smear. Go there and wait for page to load and scroll down. Then smear the government scientists and stats people for us.bullcrap as usual.
as usual you don't understand how viruses works. Covid changed at a extremely rapid rate. so your argument is pointless.
That only means YOU don't understand, or you would admit the shots are now not effective to prevent you being a case, and instead, admit that the boostered are now twice as likely to be a case, the shot having NEGATIVE effectiveness against contracting the disease. But you probably are just being a science denialist again. You have been suckered into the booster, and you will not admit what the results of boosterizing now are. It's a natural defense for many, to just lie when shown the scientific truth.as usual you don't understand how viruses works. Covid changed at a extremely rapid rate. so your argument is pointless.
Dude Covid changed the vaccine did not its not going to be perfect. but ith as saved countless lives and illness so I would say it was worth it. Since you don't understand how the numbers work and don't take the whole picture into account you think when you find numbers you know whats going on. Unless you have the education in the field you are as ignorant as anyone else.That only means YOU don't understand, or you would admit the shots are now not effective to prevent you being a case, and instead,admit that the boostered are now twice as likely to be a case. But you probably are just being a science denialist again.
Yes did you click on that graph by age??? every single recorded age the unvaxxed were the highest. Plus your taking this to mean its the same all over the world.Not according to The Government of Ontario official page. Don't be a science denier, now, just because you have an unsupported belief that runs contrary to the science. I presented the graph for you. You can go to the page yourself. I like to use official sources that you can try to smear. Go there and wait for page to load and scroll down. Then smear the government scientists and stats people for us.
Dataset - Ontario Data Catalogue
covid-19.ontario.ca
You needed to change the subject. The booster is now showing negative effectiveness in preventing the disease.Dude Covid changed the vaccine did not its not going to be perfect. but ith as saved countless lives and illness
You, not even able to read the categories. There is no group "unvaccinated".Yes did you click on that graph by age??? every single recorded age the unvaxxed were the highest. Plus your taking this to mean its the same all over the world.
View attachment 123575View attachment 123576View attachment 123577
Sorry, but American health agencies have been caught cheating the public by withholding negative information, so as to not dissuade them from taking the shots. Scientists and medical experts in America and elsewhere, accept, praise, and study Ontario's data.@fooferdoggie Texas is arguably a state with more crackers per capita than any other state.
And yet their Dept of Health posted this.
View attachment 123578
sure and vaccines make your 5g signal better.Sorry, but American health agencies have been caught cheating the public by withholding negative information, so as to not dissuade them from taking the shots. Scientists and medical experts in America and elsewhere, accept, praise, and study Ontario's data.
Please stop feeding this troll... Most of us ignored him long ago, so the only thing we see is your string of responses .sure and vaccines make your 5g signal better.
And you are changing the subject repeatedly, instead of admitting that the Ontario government data shows the boostered are twice as likely to get the disease. That was the argument you're furiously pedaling away from now.The CDC published information about the effectiveness of boosters for people under 65 two weeks ago but didn’t provide data about people 18-49 years old, the age group least likely to benefit from boosters because they’re already well protected by the first two shots, The Times said.
hehehe - must be pretty sad, seeing those desperate escape attempts because he can't even read and comprehend category names.... the only thing we see is your string of responses .
ya I need to stop its fun though.Please stop feeding this troll... Most of us ignored him long ago, so the only thing we see is your string of responses .
Or you just admit that the government data shows the boostered are covid-diseased at twice the rate of other groups. Why would they be twice the rate of the fully vaccinated? That isn't of interest? Pretty dull pedalers peddling anti-science nonsense here.ya I need to stop its fun though.
due you are like my dog who barks at the squirrels even when there are none.Or you just admit that the government data shows the boostered are covid-diseased at twice the rate of other groups. Why would they be twice the rate of the fully vaccinated?