Instead of banning certain members...

Status
Not open for further replies.

"Two doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) are 90% effective or more against polio; three doses are 99% to 100% effective.

A person is considered to be fully vaccinated if he or she has received:

It is not known how long people who received IPV will be immune to poliovirus, but they are most likely protected for many years after a complete series of IPV."
as usual you don't understand how viruses works. Covid changed at a extremely rapid rate. so your argument is pointless.
 
bullcrap as usual.
Not according to The Government of Ontario official page. Don't be a science denier, now, just because you have an unsupported belief that runs contrary to the science. I presented the graph for you. You can go to the page yourself. I like to use official sources that you can try to smear. Go there and wait for page to load and scroll down. Then smear the government scientists and stats people for us.
 
as usual you don't understand how viruses works. Covid changed at a extremely rapid rate. so your argument is pointless.
as usual you don't understand how viruses works. Covid changed at a extremely rapid rate. so your argument is pointless.
That only means YOU don't understand, or you would admit the shots are now not effective to prevent you being a case, and instead, admit that the boostered are now twice as likely to be a case, the shot having NEGATIVE effectiveness against contracting the disease. But you probably are just being a science denialist again. You have been suckered into the booster, and you will not admit what the results of boosterizing now are. It's a natural defense for many, to just lie when shown the scientific truth.
 
Last edited:
That only means YOU don't understand, or you would admit the shots are now not effective to prevent you being a case, and instead,admit that the boostered are now twice as likely to be a case. But you probably are just being a science denialist again.
Dude Covid changed the vaccine did not its not going to be perfect. but ith as saved countless lives and illness so I would say it was worth it. Since you don't understand how the numbers work and don't take the whole picture into account you think when you find numbers you know whats going on. Unless you have the education in the field you are as ignorant as anyone else.
 
Why bother? The sources posted before I ignored were all the nutbag sites. People that buy into mass murders of children as fake stories. ANY association with ANY of those nutters negates any possible sensible discussions.
Reading a Canadian takes on USA politics is laughable. And just a troll,
 
Not according to The Government of Ontario official page. Don't be a science denier, now, just because you have an unsupported belief that runs contrary to the science. I presented the graph for you. You can go to the page yourself. I like to use official sources that you can try to smear. Go there and wait for page to load and scroll down. Then smear the government scientists and stats people for us.
Yes did you click on that graph by age??? every single recorded age the unvaxxed were the highest. Plus your taking this to mean its the same all over the world.
IMG_0033.jpg
IMG_0034.jpg
IMG_0035.jpg
 
Dude Covid changed the vaccine did not its not going to be perfect. but ith as saved countless lives and illness
You needed to change the subject. The booster is now showing negative effectiveness in preventing the disease.
I am certainly not as ignorant as you are, and I never deny the science like you are doing.
 
Now investigate what they did to the group"unvaccinated" to achieve that look in the "not fully vaccinated". They dumped in cases of those who recently received shots, or having only first shot, thus hugely raising the rates of the previous "unvaccinated" group, because such a large % of population is being vaccinated and small % is unvaccinated, thus also reducing the numbers from the other groups - tilting the table with two hits. Unvaccinated are about 10% of population
Try a reading and comprehension course first
 
Last edited:
@fooferdoggie Texas is arguably a state with more crackers per capita than any other state.

And yet their Dept of Health posted this.

View attachment 123578
Sorry, but American health agencies have been caught cheating the public by withholding negative information, so as to not dissuade them from taking the shots. Scientists and medical experts in America and elsewhere, accept, praise, and study Ontario's data.
 

Sorry, but American health agencies have been caught cheating the public by withholding negative information, so as to not dissuade them from taking the shots. Scientists and medical experts in America and elsewhere, accept, praise, and study Ontario's data.
sure and vaccines make your 5g signal better.
 
Denial of the truth, foofie, gets you nowhere.
The CDC published information about the effectiveness of boosters for people under 65 two weeks ago but didn’t provide data about people 18-49 years old, the age group least likely to benefit from boosters because they’re already well protected by the first two shots, The Times said.
And you are changing the subject repeatedly, instead of admitting that the Ontario government data shows the boostered are twice as likely to get the disease. That was the argument you're furiously pedaling away from now.
 
ya I need to stop its fun though.
Or you just admit that the government data shows the boostered are covid-diseased at twice the rate of other groups. Why would they be twice the rate of the fully vaccinated? That isn't of interest? Pretty dull pedalers peddling anti-science nonsense here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back