Dining out during Covid

Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL what math and science : So if LA county is the EPI Center for Covid cases . These 14,000 Christians attending Church every week for 6 months Must be supernaturally protected . :) LOL Which is it . They are in teh worse area and nobody has gotten ill . How is that possible . In fact how is it possible that none of the churches staying open dispute the Gov's silly orders are sick . Now there have been plenty of the Apostate Churches that preach what the World wants to hear. There's been deaths there . Even though they are all closed . That's why people hate us so much . Because we serve a Real God . Not pretend one like you all pretend to believe

Because it's not true. There have been reported cases of Covid for church goers in LA County. The most famous being Grace Community Church:


Staff and members of Grace Community Church, which is led by Pastor John MacArthur, say multiple people have been infected with COVID-19 but those with knowledge of the cases are being pressured to remain silent, according to a new report.

My own church (in SoCal), which is much smaller than Grace by quite a bit, has had at least one or two cases of Covid and we've been Zooming since March.

That's why the numbers of 14,000/week and 0 Covid cases defies science and math... it's simply false.

Do you know anyone with Covid from your church? Don't lie now... God's watching.
 
Because it's not true. There have been reported cases of Covid for church goers in LA County. The most famous being Grace Community Church:




My own church (in SoCal), which is much smaller than Grace by quite a bit, has had at least one or two cases of Covid and we've been Zooming since March.

That's why the numbers of 14,000/week and 0 Covid cases defies science and math... it's simply false.

Do you know anyone with Covid from your church? Don't lie now... God's watching.
It's simple he will say those Churches aren't the real deal......
 
I already knew, I assumed you didn't. Perhaps I was wrong.
I don't mind you talking down to me. So just to get a solid "Yes' or a solid "No", you believe that 1 person can be a population as defined in population genetics, is that right?
 
I don't mind you talking down to me. So just to get a solid "Yes' or a solid "No", you believe that 1 person can be a population as defined in population genetics, is that right?
I'm not talking down to you, why would I assume you knew the subject at hand ? I don't know you. I said perhaps I was wrong in that assumption.
 
I'm not talking down to you, why would I assume you knew the subject at hand ? I don't know you. I said perhaps I was wrong in that assumption.
You might assume I knew because I used the correct technical word to convey the question. But hey! You do you.
 
But a population is "a group of people with a defining characteristic" so the only way 1 person can be considered a population for the sake of this discussion is if you consider 1 to be a group.
So my question, now that we got that cleared up, is, once again, can 1 person be a population as defined in population genetics? Thanks!
 
Wrong again, mutations don't mean damaged. There are helpful mutations ( That's how natural selection works) , neutral mutations and harmful mutations. Mutations of cells in the body that cause cancer are examples of harmful mutations and many of them are caused by viruses.
And so these harmful mutations should accordingly do the opposite of what helpful mutations do in the population, is that correct?
 
And so these harmful mutations should accordingly do the opposite of what helpful mutations do in the population, is that correct?
How do you mean? Am I your biology teacher? One would imagine there are varying degrees, as one harmful mutation could be more harmful than others or one more helpful than others. There are genes that make you more likely to get a disease or a condition but not necessarily bad enough to kill you off before you hit breeding age
 
This one is some fun. Why not enjoy life and take a chance here.
"Humans and chimps share a surprising 98.8 percent of their DNA"
And yet you share only 50% with a brother or sister unless you're identical twins.

What do you really think about your siblings?
 
This one is some fun. Why not enjoy life and take a chance here.
"Humans and chimps share a surprising 98.8 percent of their DNA"
And yet you share only 50% with a brother or sister unless you're identical twins.

What do you really think about your siblings?
What do you mean by enjoy life?
 
How do you mean? Am I your biology teacher? One would imagine there are varying degrees, as one harmful mutation could be more harmful than others or more helpful than others. There are genes that make you more likely to get a disease or a condition but not necessarily bad enough to kill you off before you hit breeding age
Oh, I thought you seemed quite contented to be the teacher. So varying degrees of going the opposite way in the population? Still the opposite way, or what?
 
"And so these harmful mutations should accordingly do the opposite of what helpful mutations do in the population, is that correct?"

That seems such an easy question if I'm following what you say about helpful mutations. So what's the missing piece of that puzzle?
 
"Humans and chimps share a surprising 98.8 percent of their DNA"
And yet you share only 50% with a brother or sister unless you're identical twins.
It's been a long time since biology class, but isn't this mixing chromosomes and dna? We do share a large part of our dna with chimps, but only 1/2 of our chromosomes with each parent?

Anyway, back to ebikes...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back