Bicycle helmet safety testing, interesting technical study

EMGX

Well-Known Member

"Below is a summary of the key findings:

  • The least protective helmet had a 2.62 times higher overall head injury risk than the most protective helmet. There was a lesser spread of linear risk (1.76 times) compared to rotational risk (4.21 times).
  • The pXR and pZR impact locations produced highest linear and rotational risks, respectively.
  • The nine helmets offering the best overall injury protection were all equipped with the anti-rotation technology MIPS, which in direct helmet comparisons between models with MIPS and no-MIPS versions, was shown to be effective in reducing rotational kinematics and risk under the impact conditions tested. However, not all helmets equipped with MIPS were the most protective.
  • Mass and price in isolation did not demonstrate a significant effect on exposure-weighted linear, rotational and overall risk, P(injury@helmet). However, the OLS model predicting non-exposure-weighted overall risk, P(injury@location), using price, mass, presence of MIPS and impact location showed that both price and mass had a small influence on the non-exposure-weighted overall risk, with increased mass and price shown to relate to increased non-exposure-weighted overall risk."
 
Back