interesting; but i'm not quite sure why you couldn't get the same thing out of a bike with more sensors and the correct settings. obviously every bike with a torque sensor also has a cadence sensor. at least with the specialized system, the distinction between the power multiplication ratio and the maximum assist gives you a similar result. for example a high multiplication factor (say 3x) would generate consistent and significant forward motion when you're just pedaling softly (e.g. 50 rider watts + 150 motor watts) with a cutoff of 300 watts of motor power would scale smoothly from 50 to 100 watts of of rider power, and beyond the 100 watts of rider power (when you want to work really really hard) the motor doesn't continue to do more work, allowing you stay at a human-friendly cadence and gear.
your comment makes me think they should add a "minimum" motor power, where as long as you're pedaling (which of course the system knows) the motor provides at least XX watts. i'm of the mind that more sensors and more customization is better, and the lack of a torque sensor on traditional/low-end hub drive greatly limits the possibilities, but of course it simplifies other things.