That person has an EBR a reaction score of 2. Basically no one responds or cares. Cursor over that avatar to see it. Outliers sometimes happen. It is the nature of things. What exactly is the specific question? Is it about illegal eMotos being hated, impounded, and crushed? I love
@Gionnirocket 's animations, still not knowing how he pulls it off. My reaction score is 9,900+. I am all for David's two cents here. Keep at it. Maybe someone will react in a positive way, someday.
While I created this profile in 2020, I've only recently started making posts, so it is not like I've only gotten 2 reactions in six years. I've only started now because this is a crucial time to begin to fight the legislation legally. I'm not here for popularity, just to make sure the information is available to those who want to take it seriously. I confess I do not understand how near the whole board that's interacted with me is so opposed to legal information. If I never get more than a six (up from two! woo-hoo!) reaction score, I don't really care as long as there is just one who benefits. Every legal point I've made is highly accurate. I'm disappointed in how little people seem to care about legal solutions while somewhat aware of a legal problem. I think the board has lost sight of civility in a major way. Tracking down the forum rules is not easy here, but the first one is "Be friendly."
It is neither the case that no one responds or cares. It's people engaging with half-baked understandings of the law they have no real clue about finding out they cannot win a legal argument with me. Not that I am never wrong, just no-one has an argument that actually shows I am wrong. I wouldn't dare contradict you in shop talk unless I really really knew what I was talking about, and if I did, and you realized your mistake, you have the humility to admit it and so do I. People are so conditioned by industry manipulation of the regulatoiry concepts that their worldview is shocked when someone comes along and clarifies. Cognitive dissonance.
Here's the two threads gionnirocket thinks are so important to insult me over, pretending he knows something about it that he cannot articulate:
https://forums.electricbikereview.c...d-e-bikes-alike-is-not-a-credible-fear.59287/ (okay, I've looked for the first instance and am not immediately finding it.
Here's a thread I commented in. Here, on page 2, 2 posts down from yours, I made a post about why 1 watt might be important after all, and note--becasue NONE of the internet "State-by-State Guide to e-Bike laws" ever include the motor power rating, whether it is "less than 750 watts" "no more than" or "averaging." People online who want to figure out what is going on have no way to do it except to figure out the statute number. PeopleForBikes conceals this watts info in their guide and of course don't include the statute numbers either. This post is about the only place on the internet you can find those details. It took me a long time manually verifying each state and categorizing them to get it done and the only reason I even did it was to be helpful to others. Now I notice my statute list is incomplete, there's only 48. Sigh. Now I have to figure which ones I missed.
I live in Ohio and the law states ebikes must have a motor LESS than 750 watts. This is also the same as the federal law, and the same wording for ebikes when it comes to that new tax refund for ebikes. So does that mean, an ebike with a motor rated exactly 750 watts is technically illegal...
forums.electricbikereview.com
https://forums.electricbikereview.com/threads/resist-all-negative-thinking.52076/ Here's an apt quote from someone who has not been friendly at all toward me. Last I knew, mschwett was refusing to have a civil conversation in favor of calling me a sovereign citizen.
well said. this forum, and one other bike forum that i frequent have a small minority who can be very unpleasant at times. they’re easy enough to ignore - the world has enough unpleasantness in it, no need to trouble one’s self with what someone posts on an internet forum. everyone here has access to the internet and an electric bicycle (and likely much, much more) which means we don’t have too much to complain about in the big picture.
it is a mark of character to be able to have an intelligent, civil conversation with someone that you disagree with, as it is to understand the limitations of your own knowledge and experience.
Chargeride interacts and stands in stark contrast, remaining civil. Here's a comment from the same thread.
What I notice the most is mob rule, once a person is targeted, they try to dehumanise them which brings in more personal attacks, then they start feeding off each other to post the most horrible responses.
They will start to invent an entire back story for the person, right down to accusing them of serious crimes, then that becomes the truth.
I'm sure it's a mirror of a million conflicts and genocides.
We must remember, everything we write on the internet, everything we consume is being harvested and analysed by academia with super computers.
I fear their solutions might be worse than the disease.
What's funny about this thread is a guy named Stefan appears to have been getting unfairly attacked and he posted the very best comment about human behavior in the thread. Sometimes I think it's just about not-so-smart people attacking people who seem smarter. It's like classroom bullying where the most intelligent student gets bullied. The fake backstory is being developed about me.
Funnily enough, it has a little to do with the internet. It is all about the human nature.
Only in 1831, a German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer published the book "Eristic Dialectic: The Art of Winning an Argument". Even if scholars met face to face in those times, they used many dishonest arguments just to win a discussion. Schopenhauer listed as many as 38 ways of winning the discussion, and sadly these are the same as used today on the internet.
en.wikipedia.org
The ultimate stratagem #38, Argumentum Ad Personam (become personal, insulting, rude) is the proof the person resorting to it has lost the discussion. In modern terms, such a person deserves an Ignore. Have you people noticed Argumentum Ad Personam has become the only modus operandi for several users (trolls, stalkers) here on EBR Fora?
Jabberwocky gave me a hard time but engaged enough I think he might come around. Strangely I started liking the Jabberwock despite his penchant for mockery. I thought his attack calling me a Don Juan tilting at windmills was hilarious since he'd been defending the windmills.
I'll be fine. Forum popularity is the last thing on my mind--I have no desire to be popular when popular might be the same thing as displaying the worst of human behavior. I know about the ignore button.