Does anyone here "name" their eBikes?

I have trouble remembering the names of people I meet, I'll not compound the problem with names for pushbikes. If I named every pushbike motorbike and car I have there would be 22 new names to remember. Now if I had a dog I would name that, that just makes sense since you are calling it and it will come, especially if it's dinner time ;)
 
So, was there never an Arnold?
No, actually not. The name of Fearless carries a lot of positive load. If you own both a heavy but powerful e-bike and a lightweight but half as strong one, Fearless gives the rider a feeling the weaker e-bike would cope with any difficult situation. And it does. It rides very well in rough terrain, can be carried over obstacles, and even can cover a long distance or manage well on group rides (if enough batteries are carried).

1778659189057.png

My favourite photo. It was the weirdest rally I took part in, Mazowiecki Gravel 2023 200. I had a support car and rode for 263 km altogether. Of that distance, only 70 km on asphalt was the Roadrunner but the lion share of the rally was covered on Fearless. Yes, I needed to recharge the batteries during an overnight stay. Nowadays, I only ride the hardest rallies on Roadrunner but whenever the max climb is 12%, I elect Fearless.
 
In my experience its customary for other people to name your bike.
Such as..
Rust bucket
Death trap

and the classic.
HMS Neverbudge.

@PedalUma says my ebike is a "Monstrosity" and refers to it as "Sinfully Heavy".

Stephan calls it "Cheap Chinese Junk".

I'm sure there's a word play in there somewhere??
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260426_224417_Gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_20260426_224417_Gallery.jpg
    229.3 KB · Views: 21
No, actually not. The name of Fearless carries a lot of positive load. If you own both a heavy but powerful e-bike and a lightweight but half as strong one, Fearless gives the rider a feeling the weaker e-bike would cope with any difficult situation. And it does. It rides very well in rough terrain, can be carried over obstacles, and even can cover a long distance or manage well on group rides (if enough batteries are carried).

View attachment 209923
My favourite photo. It was the weirdest rally I took part in, Mazowiecki Gravel 2023 200. I had a support car and rode for 263 km altogether. Of that distance, only 70 km on asphalt was the Roadrunner but the lion share of the rally was covered on Fearless. Yes, I needed to recharge the batteries during an overnight stay. Nowadays, I only ride the hardest rallies on Roadrunner but whenever the max climb is 12%, I elect Fearless.
That face is saying..'wheres the bed?:
 
I have encouraged people to name their bikes. Then they take better care of them.

I only care about proper maintenance.
I didn't even wash my ebike when I took it apart to install the mid-drive motor or regrease my shock.

My $435 downhill forks are covered in dirt and scratches.

So,..
How bout "Big Fat Dirty Pig" ??


It's up to you @PedalUma
Someone else is supposed to give it a nickname.

I've already signed it. (But I spelt it wrong.) It just needs a good name.

20260513_112649.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260513_113229_Amazon Shopping.jpg
    Screenshot_20260513_113229_Amazon Shopping.jpg
    96.2 KB · Views: 17
It's up to you @PedalUma
Someone else is supposed to give it a nickname.
I think you should ask for name nomination submissions. Then setup a poll thread for voting on the top five you like best. I know one guy with a bike called Maverick because its his wingman, another with a bike named Mercury for the fast messenger of the gods.
Pigpen either from the Dead or Peanuts?

1778702733836.png
1778702782027.png
 
I think that’s a very interesting observation... "I have encouraged people to name their bikes. Then they take better care of them."

I guess it makes sense for people who naturally wouldn't care for mechanical things, the sort of people who wouldn't think to check tire pressures etc. I know a few like that, and one guy works on an oil rig!
 
I guess it makes sense for people who naturally wouldn't care for mechanical things, the sort of people who wouldn't think to check tire pressures etc. I know a few like that, and one guy works on an oil rig!
I have found the worst abusers of bikes are slightly autistic and are young males. Full throttle 100% of the time, in the highest power level 100% of the time, and never shifting with it always in the highest gear. One ruined his bike in three weeks from new in the box. Would someone who loved their named horse do that. That guy had no brake pads left - metal to metal, he fried the controller, crashed six times, and ruined the drivetrain. Spokes were lose and the headset thrashed. And it had a bent crank arm.

1778707529488.png
 
Mercury... who should have been named Icarus. Pedaluma and I flew too close to the sun... we knew the bottom bracket was too wide, but forged ahead anyway. Bad chain line, mount exposed to unreasonable torsional stress (likely, though speculative), motor cracked, bottom bracket had a deep scratch. Probably structurally sound, but in good conscience, I wouldn't feel right selling it. A total write-off. I take responsibility... Pedal did suggest a different frame, but I am an unusual build myself at 6 foot one and 150 pounds, I really wanted the Team 1, and... well, I think we just wanted to find out what would happen. Which we did.

A lot of fun to ride in many situations, but there were subtle things about it, in hindsight, that never felt right. It reminds me of a 1999 MX5 that I owned which had non-stock struts... hard to get the torque I wanted when I needed it, and too much torque when I didn't = similar problem: The rear wheel(s) would lose traction when cornering, often at the bottom of a hill, though it wasn't predictable.

My mechanic bought the 99 from me, sold it to his son, and then bought it back because he couldn't drive it safely.

Marin Right Right Angle - 1 copy 2.jpg


This is Nightmare, a Canyon Grizl ON CF:7. She is about a year old. On paper, at least 20nm less torque, but in the real world, way more powerful, and far better suited to the vast majority of terrain that I ride.

MUCH more skittish in deep Sierra sand than Mercury or Seeker, similar to Survivor, though Survivor might have had better traction in sand... Nightmare is rideable, but takes a lot more finesse. It's fine when I can see the road surface, but very tricky in the late afternoon when riding into the sun, when the sand is harder to see. Can manage small-medium rock gardens on intermediate single track, but very challenging in the tight spots when going slow, mostly due to the gearing, but I think also the weight distribution. If I could add a bigger granny gear, that would solve most of the problem, but not all.

On bad pavement and on gravel, insanely fast and capable, a beast on the street. It has taken me a year to really learn how to get the most from the SX motor, but it is more forgiving after the June 2025 update and boost to 60nm of torque (from 55.) Seeker took about 18 minutes to get to my Saturday Night 12-step meeting, Mercury took about 16 minutes, but Nightmare can do it in just under 13 minutes.

For downhill speed, gets a little floaty above 38 MPH on worn pavement. Seeker could get up to 43 before I would chicken out. On a better road surface, I bet Nightmare would handle okay at 40.


Nightmare smallest smallest.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I have found the worst abusers of bikes are slightly autistic and are young males.
Well that's just normal human behavior, most boys drive things into the ground, I did. It's a part of the same psychology that governments employ when they want cannon fodder to attack other nations for their oil or whatever. They know the young men are high risk takers and sign them up at 18. Just look at all those vids of ebikes, how many are girls and women and how many are boys and men? Same with all the motorcycle vids. Out where I live hundreds of bikers come through on the weekends and many stop for coffee. Hardly a pink helmet among them.
 
Back