I am a gravel cyclist... Even if I do not like the type of surfaces we are forced to ride in my region (forest, sands, mud, and even concrete slabs or blocks called "trilink"...)
If I had one gripe about my Vado SL it is the rigidity of the frame. As you know I have softened the ride somewhat and I find it entirely acceptable now.
That's why I went with Redshift front/rear. (Should have bought VSL 5.0 non-EQ right from the beginning). The last step I've done are 42 mm tubeless Tracer Pro that I can run at 2.5 bars (36 psi).
I wish my SL was as quiet as my full power Vado!
True! There are more and more opinions Vado SL is quieter than Creo 1 (using the same motor). What I found is the SL 1.1 motor is quieter at low cadence (it does not help me much though!)
makes sense, certainly a big savings for them vs making two frames
Vado SL is one of the best selling
Specialized e-bikes because it made the dream of a lightweight "just a bicycle" e-bike come true. I see no reason for Specialized make a weird flat-bar e-bike based on the Creo 2 frame.
Specialized Bicycles made an announcement of the new Creo 2 E5 on Facebook. I took part in a discussion on the Polish page of the brand. There was no single e-bike hater there! (Only owners of Specialized e-bikes -- or other e-bike brands -- were present in the discussion). So there were owners of Levos, Kenevos, Vado SL, Orbea Rise, and a single Creo EVO user. The Kenevo user asked this question: 'What sense does it make to produce a 25 km/h road e-bike?'. I explained it was a gravel e-bike, which was met with some understanding. However, the man pressed hard: 'But when you are on asphalt, you will need to drag extra kilograms with your own legs!'
A Polish gravel cyclist with his modified Vado SL on holiday in Italy (the photo taken from the discussion). See the soiled wheels
Creo 2 (and especially Creo 1) are niche products in Europe, the biggest e-bike market. I'm sure Specialized know this, and that's why they put the stress on the fact Creo 2 is a
gravel e-bike, as gravel cycling is popular in Europe, and the low assisted speed can be justified by riding the Creo 2 in rough terrain (which we are certainly not lacking here).
i suppose it feels a little different, the front wheel being so much further forward relative to the bars - similar to a slacker head tube.
At last someone could explain why I felt so strangely on the Diverge EVO (and the Epic 8 was even worse)! The stem was projecting approximately at the half of my torso... Riding either of those bikes made me exhausted soon. While I could ride a Creo 1 size 54 for 57 km and was not really happy but it was not a struggle at least. (I was frustrated by the fact
anyone rode their bikes faster than I could!)