PearTune 3.0 for SL1.1 installed
Installed, working fine!
I won't describe the process or present pictures (If someone is interested, please write a PM to me). Impressions only:
The PearTune setup for SL 1.1 e-bikes is not that complicated as it is for Giant. Yet, you need to be mechanically and electronically inclined to do the job yourself.
- Dropping the motor is very easy, and the motor chamber is surprisingly "clean" and tidy. (This phase requires removing the chainring to get access to all motor mounting bolts).
- The chip shall reside inside the top tube under the TCU unit. Routing the PearTune cables from the top tube through the head tube then through the bottom tube (along the battery) and finally to the motor chamber is tricky. There is a folded sheet of plastic inside the head tube that protects the cables inside the frame against being rubbed by the steering tube; this piece makes it hard to route the PT cable through the head tube. Removing the fork may be necessary.
- PT connects to the TCU unit with two connectors. However, the other cable end is terminated with two flimsy electronic connectors (one connector goes to the speed sensor cable while the other is connected to the motor terminal. The reason for using such flimsy connectors (instead of proper ones) is important: The polarity of PT wires on the motor side is critical, and the wires are colour-coded to avoid making a mistake. These small connectors allow the wire colours to be seen and identified. To ensure that the connectors stay secured in respective sockets, two pieces of heat shrink tube have been provided; so you need to have a heat gun to complete the process.
The unit works very well and as intended. You activate the Normal version of the PT by short depressing the Walk Mode button on the remote. If you own the TCD display, number 9 will briefly show as speed value (but you do not need to own the display anyway). Second short depressing the button deactivates the PT (number 2 appears on the display). If you order Still On version of the PT, your SL e-bike (Levo, Creo or Vado or Como) would be permanently de-restricted.
Performance
To keep the matter short: You just get a full blown bike with no artificial and annoying motor cut-off. Yet the chip won't turn the bike into a motorcycle because only the speed restriction is lifted but the motor wouldn't become any stronger. With 25 km/h Euro SL e-bikes, using the chip is beneficial: the motor cut-off at that speed is infuriating, and de-restricting means that you can ride at somewhat higher speed very naturally. But that won't make an SL e-bike a speed demon (which is totally different to full-power e-bikes).
To ride really faster on a derestricted SL e-bike requires at least one of these conditions met:
- The rider can really pedal strongly (which eliminates ailing people), or
- You use far more juice from the battery, which will significantly reduce the impressive battery range of SL e-bikes.
Example:
I can input the FTP of 100 W into the cranks (FTP is continuous rider's leg power delivered for 1 hour); I can produce around 160 W when I try harder, and 411 W is my peak power.
- 25 km/h restricted SL ridden for 33 km (around 20 mi), partly upwind, and partly off-road: Average speed 18.6 km/h (11.6 mph), battery consumption 31%
- As above, a 72.6 km (45.1 mi) loop. Average speed of 20.6 km/h (12.8 mph), battery consumption 86%
- Derestricted, sidewind, 160 W leg input, 45/70% assistance: Cruising speed of 25 km/h (15.5 mph)
- As above, 65/85% assistance, cruising speed of 30 km/h (18.6 mph)
- As above, 100/100% assistance, peak leg power applied for a while: max speed of 34 km/h (21.1 mph)
- Derestricted, riding mostly in 65/85% assistance, 29 km (18 mi), sidewind, average speed of 24.6 km/h (15.3 mph), battery consumption 51%.
Verdict: Installing PT on an SL e-bike only makes sense when you frequently hit the speed limiter set to your country's law. For instance, I see no reason to do anything to U.S. Class 3 SL e-bikes; and derestricting a Canadian 32 km/h SL makes little sense too. While European, Australian or Japanese rider would love to derestrict, especially when we are talking on Creo SL, the road e-bike.
The bottom line
Derestricting Vado SL is bad for the battery/range, and it diminishes the fitness value of that e-bike. I intend to continue riding in low power assistance modes except an urgent need to ride faster from time to time. Still, derestricting has made my SL become a completely normal
bike, and now the Vado SL meets all my expectations.