Stefan Mikes
Gravel e-biker
- Region
- Europe
- City
- Mazovia, PL
You think the carbon fork of SL 5.0 is heavy?a lightweight fork.
Kinect 2.1.slight rear suspension
P.S. XC bikes have no rear suspension. XC bikes have front suspension though.
You think the carbon fork of SL 5.0 is heavy?a lightweight fork.
Kinect 2.1.slight rear suspension
No its really light but if they made a model for some minor offroading, having a suspension fork would be nice; but right now the SL is a really good fitness bike as isYou think the carbon fork of SL 5.0 is heavy?
Kinect 2.1.
I assume you've never tried either the Specialized FutureShock or Redshift ShockStop stem? (A suspension fork only increases the weight. Cheap suspension fork is even not close to either FutureShock or Redshift).No its really light but if they made a model for some minor offroading, having a suspension fork would be nice; but right now the SL is a really good fitness bike as is
interesting.. I havent but ill do some research on themI assume you've never tried either the Specialized FutureShock or Redshift ShockStop stem? (A suspension fork only increases the weight. Cheap suspension fork is even not close to either FutureShock or Redshift).
You're lucky because the fork of your Vado 5.0 is adequate. Don't try Redshift, as it is not recommended (really) to use two suspensions systems in series.
Still, compare the weight of a Vado SL and Levo SL Comp. Levo is far more heavy because of dual suspension.
Another surprise is that the Como SL with IGH weighs as much as my Como with derailleur.This makes sense, I thought I read that the Levo and Vado SL's were around the same weight but the suspension being heavier is logical
Turbo Levo SL lightMan.. the Vado SL would be a perfect XC bike with slight rear suspension and a lightweight fork..
That, WEIGHT, was the deciding factor for me and the Creo. While I did get the heaviest Credo, Aluminum, I wanted a bike I could get up short flights of steps to my house - 6 from the street, 3 to the deck and 3 more to the house. I also wanted to be able to lit it on a rack. Again, weight made that determination. Now when I tested the Creo, I knew it had a bit less power than my titanium front hub converted bike when I tested it. I rode a steep hill three times. It was harder than the front hub bike but I was able to do it with some effort. But I still slept on it for a week. Then asked for another test ride. Doing that same steep hill with some others about 3 or 4 times. Yes, it was work but it worked. Decision made.That was what I was referring to in post #3 when I said "the bike for you". I remember reading your posts when you were searching out your first ebike an SLs didn't exist yet,
"An ebike under 40 lbs used to be really rare and ridiculously expensive. Now they are just ridiculously expensive. Progress!"
I have been “shocked” by the improvement in tidexand comfort provided by the Redshift Shockstop seat post suspension on our Allants. For the small-ish bumps on paved trails and sidewalks it does a decent job tricking you into believing there is a real suspension under there.I assume you've never tried either the Specialized FutureShock or Redshift ShockStop stem? (A suspension fork only increases the weight. Cheap suspension fork is even not close to either FutureShock or Redshift).
I wonder if Redshift would like to be sold. So far, they serve the whole market with the special focus on gravel bikes (I'm talking about the stems, specifically). The time will show.So the point about stem and seatpost suspensions on a fixed frame bike I think is eminently practical. I prefict Redshift gets bought by … a big bike mfr and we see a new type of ebike introduced. Tim
I'd bet an LBS could have one on the fitting room bike and sell a bunch as dealer installed optionsI wonder if Redshift would like to be sold. So far, they serve the whole market with the special focus on gravel bikes (I'm talking about the stems, specifically). The time will show.
I ran a little google map calculator and I have about a mile at 8-10% grade to get home every evening. I'm no longer all that athletic and it is enough to give me serious second thoughts about riding to work on my ordinary road bike. I don't mind pedaling, but on cold rainy nights I just want to get home in comfort.
I was leaning towards the regular Vado 5.0 for the more robust rack and possibility of front rack or bag. I have an Ortlieb bag on my other bike but it looks like I would have to reposition the front headlight to put a front back on the Vado SL. On the bigger Vado the light is mounted on the fork crown so out of the way of front bags.
But honestly I think I could be happy with the lighter SL. It seems much more bike-like and fun to ride. And I honestly don't really need to load the thing down all that much. I will get the version with fenders and rack though since this is the Pacific Northwest.
I have both the Levo SL and Vado SL. I used a bathroom scale to get approximate weights of each as well as a Tero I recently purchased.This makes sense, I thought I read that the Levo and Vado SL's were around the same weight but the suspension being heavier is logical
great deals on MY20 creos still!!! you know you want oneDid a little window shopping today and my LBS had both M and L silver Vado SL's sitting on the floor. Looks really nice in that color and with a clean cockpit too.
Of course the Creo SL with the Di2 shifting looked pretty nice too...
they’re 25% off if purchased from specialized, and most shops are also honoring that. or you can buy on the website and have it delivered to your shop for assembly and fitting, shop gets 50% of the usual commission without doing much. presumably they’re trying to clear out the older models before they push the 2022 ones into the US. other markets have them already - the only big change is the mastermind TCU, which the new Vados and Tero’s etc have already.So what’s up with the prices on the 2020 Creos? I know where there’s one, actually looked at it today while at the shop picking up some tire patch stuff, but there’s no change to the price tag. I’ve been watching that bike for over a year.
I agree that the full-power Vado would probably be best for you if the purpose is commuting and utility usage. Since you have a couple of great recreational bikes, you won't have to be concerned about the Vado's weight, off-road handling, etc. If you test ride both back-to-back, you will definitely feel the difference!Are there any particular things I should be looking for when I test drive these two bikes?