Trying to make sense of Vado and Tero geometry

[Simonsez]

Hello Specialized E-bike experts, first post but I’ve been lurking for a while.

I’m currently considering a Vado (regular or SL – not sure yet) and the Tero (hardtail non-X version). The 5.0 versions for all 3 are the exact same price where I live and I think that all 3 would work for my purpose of smooth and rough roads as well as some gravel and rail trails.

What I’m really trying to figure out is the riding style for all 3 as they all have different geometries. I have yet to ride any of them as they're difficult to find in bike shops but can be ordered.

Vado 5.0:
Top Tube Length: 675mm
Reach: 481mm
Stack: 676mm

Vado SL 2 5.0:
Top Tube Length: 665mm
Reach: 450mm
Stack: 693mm

Tero 5.0
Top Tube Length: 680mm
Reach: 462mm
Stack: 687mm

I prefer a more upright riding position due to recurring neck pains, am I right in thinking that the Vado SL has the most relaxed upright position followed by the Tero than the regular Vado being the most aggressive and stretched out?

Would love to hear some feedback for those that have ridden at least 2 of these models for comparison sakes. Thank you

 

[Stefan Mikes]

I cannot answer your question regarding the geometry. Only I would start making a choice based on different criteria:

• Do I prefer light weight over the motor power and battery size?
• Or, would I need a more powerful e-bike and longer range at the cost of riding a heavier e-bike?
• How much time would I spend off-road?

As long as you choose the proper bike size, you can fit the bike to your body.

 

[e-levity]

Hmmm, I’ve enjoyed versions of all three of these - Vado, Vado SL (1), and currently a Tero X 6. The geo differences aren’t that great, and they can be largely compensated for with stem length and rise or drop, with handlebar shape, width and roll, and with seat position adjustment. I imagine you could make any of these fit your desired riding position.

I would make my decision based more on intended use. Do you want/need power? If so, the Vado and Tero offer more. Is bike weight an issue? Then the SL is significantly lighter. Do you plan on taking it on any rough terrain? Then the Tero 5 is the only one that accepts wide tires for cushion and traction. The Vado, Vado SL, and Tero hardtails have too much unsuspended weight for anything other than smooth dirt, sand or gravel. You’ll want a Tero X with suspension to tackle any thing more than that.

You’ll probably have fun with any of your choices.
Good luck!

EDIT: Stefan posted the same thing while I was typing my response

 

[Simonsez]

Ok thank you to the both of you for your responses. Good to know that adjustments can be made with any of these bikes to fit my preferred riding position. Hoping to test ride some of them in the next week or so.

 

[Extreme1]

You should be able to find a bike shop that has several versions and sizes of what you’re looking for. A test ride will speak a thousand words, just make sure the seat height and fore/aft is adjusted correctly for you. A taller stem can be fitted if you want to sit more upright.

A Specialized Como may work for you too, but it won’t do well off-road.