rochrunner
Well-Known Member
- Region
- USA
- City
- Rochester Hills MI
...in that they never seem to have the exact combination of features that I'm looking for. I've pretty well decided to change my Vado 4.0 for a Vado SL 5.0 some time between now and the beginning of next year's season, the timing being more than a little dependent on what my LBS can get in stock. Before buying the Vado 4, I had described my ideal e-bike as "my Crosstrail with a motor". At the time, the regular Vado was as close as I could find as far as geometry is concerned, but the weight meant that I couldn't have the same fun with it in some conditions as with a much lighter, more flickable bike, and it had a lot more power than I really needed.
After seeing and taking a ride on a Vado SL 4.0 a few weeks ago I can say that it truly is a Crosstrail replacement for me and in fact feels pretty much identical with the mode set to Off and even weighs about the same! I decided on the SL 5.0 because I like the idea of the extra gearing and the front shock, and had also decided on the non-EQ version since I don't need fenders, would like to use a rack of my choice, and it has more suitable tires for the unpaved surfaces that I am often on (Pathfinder vs Nimbus).
When the step-thru (ST) models were recently introduced, I started seriously thinking of going that route until I saw that Specialized had done it to me again: there is not a non-EQ version of the 5.0 ST! They have a non-EQ 4.0 ST, but for some strange reason not in 5.0 form. So my decision now is to stick with the regular-frame SL 5.0 or get the SL 5.0 ST EQ, then remove the fenders and rack and change the tires, which is like throwing away $100 worth of stuff and spending an extra $100.
Why don't they consult with me before making product decisions like this??
After seeing and taking a ride on a Vado SL 4.0 a few weeks ago I can say that it truly is a Crosstrail replacement for me and in fact feels pretty much identical with the mode set to Off and even weighs about the same! I decided on the SL 5.0 because I like the idea of the extra gearing and the front shock, and had also decided on the non-EQ version since I don't need fenders, would like to use a rack of my choice, and it has more suitable tires for the unpaved surfaces that I am often on (Pathfinder vs Nimbus).
When the step-thru (ST) models were recently introduced, I started seriously thinking of going that route until I saw that Specialized had done it to me again: there is not a non-EQ version of the 5.0 ST! They have a non-EQ 4.0 ST, but for some strange reason not in 5.0 form. So my decision now is to stick with the regular-frame SL 5.0 or get the SL 5.0 ST EQ, then remove the fenders and rack and change the tires, which is like throwing away $100 worth of stuff and spending an extra $100.
Why don't they consult with me before making product decisions like this??