Regen Braking for e-bikes ?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 4210
  • Start date
I have a 1500w DD now, and below 15-20mph, and in MHO it would be no contest. A 750w+ gear drive will just smoke it! I don't see 1000w DD motors competing with gear drives. Not at legal speeds anyway. Exception being the DD being fed a diet of 52v+ and 40-50a.

That was sarcasm!

What irks me on social forums like this is: people who have no extensive experience on a product start spreading misinformation.
So, I was being sarcastic.

A 750W DD hub motor running at 48V would be simple, powerful, very robust and provide a long service life. They are still the most wisely used motor systems.
Bosch, Shimano, Yamaha and Brose put together won't touch the number of DD hub motors on the road. The sheer number of motors on Asian roads vastly surpasses any mid-drive manufacturer.
 
That was sarcasm!

What irks me on social forums like this is: people who have no extensive experience on a product start spreading misinformation.
So, I was being sarcastic.

A 750W DD hub motor running at 48V would be simple, powerful, very robust and provide a long service life. They are still the most wisely used motor systems.
Bosch, Shimano, Yamaha and Brose put together won't touch the number of DD hub motors on the road. The sheer number of motors on Asian roads vastly surpasses any mid-drive manufacturer.


My bad for not picking up on your sarcasm. Truth be told, I was kind of surprised at a statement like that coming from you.... We're good. Let's move on.
 
Yeah I replace my brake pads about the same frequency, that's why I bought them in bulk from AliExpress.
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/329...chweb0_0,searchweb201602_2,searchweb201603_52

Also if primary benefit of regen is to conserve brake pads, I don't think it's worth the added cost.
In addition, regen can conserve rear brake only, which has a lot less effect anyways.

I don't understand why regen can conserve rear brake only. If it's slows the bike down wouldn't it mean using either or both brakes less? Just asking, I guess I'm missing something.
 
Because regen is on the rear hub motor.

The braking force on the bicycle is much greater at the front than rear.
It can be 90% / 10% or maybe 70% / 30%, whatever the situation, there's no secret about it and that's why bicycles (or motorcycles for that matter) have much greater brakes.

So let's say you're in the situation where you want to stop immediately, and you need to apply something like 90% force at front. Now, the rest of 10% is rear. It doesn't matter that 10% comes from 5% rear pad and 5% regen, or 2% rear pad and 8% regen, it is still 10% rear and 90% front.

Let's say you're coasting downhill and applying both brakes to slow down, maybe 60% front and 40% rear, it doesn't matter if it's 10% regen and 30% rear pad, or 35% regen and 5% pad, it makes no difference.

So yea, in any scenario, it will conserve the rear pad, but not front.

There was a time when brake weight transfer concept was not applied to bicycles and the overwhelming majority of bicycles only have rear brakes. As long as the rear wheel does not lift or lose traction, the rear brakes were adequate during that era.

Taking into account the weight transfer to the front when stopping, many new ebikes have bigger front brakes for optimal stopping.

However, if you are only applying mild to moderate braking, the rear brake is enough to stop the ebike.
 
"Because regen is on the rear hub motor."

Not on my two bikes that have front DD motors. One is the Grin AnyAxle that is the same 4kg weight as a typical geared hub motor.

I use regen all the time, and in fact it is the first braking method I have on board that I activate, then the front lever that I can operate easily while holding down the button, and then the rear. To set up mine all I added was a momentary switch button and hooked up the wires to the pre-existing cable of my CA3. Not even enough weight and certainly cost to speak of.

As far as it feeding back into the battery for the amount of use I get out of it as a brake any extra wh's I get in return are just gravy.
 
Since the GMAC is a geared motor (in contrast to direct hub drives), it has quicker acceleration and deceleration which is very helpful in hilly roads. At the 3:20 mark of the video, it demonstrates the use regen braking alone (without the mechanical brake) to stop from a steep downhill. That is impressive in my book.

 
Listen, you can't tell me anything about motorcycle or bicycle brakes, you're a complete novice, if your even that. Tom had you pegged correctly when he noted you have no personal experience you're just regurgitating what you've read on a forum somewhere and we all know everything on the forums is spot on.
 
I watched the video a while ago.
I have been looking at Grin chart (on motor simulator) and Juiced specs and videos on YouTube.

To this day, I still don't understand how Juiced goes a lot faster than what Grin chart claims.

Pretty simple. Most trust that sim way more than they trust what a manf. has to say about their bike specs.
 
I watched the video a while ago.
I have been looking at Grin chart (on motor simulator) and Juiced specs and videos on YouTube.

To this day, I still don't understand how Juiced goes a lot faster than what Grin chart claims.

I have also been comparing the simulation vs Juicebike's manufacturer claim, many many times.

Keep in mind that there are a number of factors that are not taken into account in the simulation.
1. Tora is an athletic person (an olympian in fact). A seasoned cyclist can kick out 1,000 watts in short bursts. I assume Tora was putting out 400-500 watts of leg power on those top speed runs.
2. The battery's state of charge is not the same as the rated charge. A 52 volt battery is in fact 56 volts when fully charged and has about 10% more power.
3. Aerodynamics affect top speed significantly.
4. The simulation itself is very conservative to accommodate other unaccounted factors.
 
Regenerative braking DOES increase the effectiveness of ANY ebike braking system. I'm referring to available controllers and DD/Grin MAC

It is NOT an expensive addition. A quality built controller will have the capability. ALL my EM3ev and Grin controllers come with regen. I believe my Lyen 6FET does too, but I use it on a wimpy MXUS GD.

Why not used by makers discussed here? It's painfully obvious in this thread. Some of us make decisions on confusing and often VERY VERY bad information gleaned from forums, or an OEM that is actually just protecting themselves from know it all customers.

I've had customers on several occasions that didn't stop and think or didn't have a system with a display like the CA series from Grin. Running regen on a long downhill and overcharging is a distinct possibility. A typical n00b won't use due diligence and learn how to mitigate any issues. DD with a CA give us flexibility in programming effective regen.

I come from the world of building and kits. I stay there because I afforded myself the opportunity to try nearly every style of motor available. I can build a much better bike. I choose components that have parts accessibilities and a range of setting for 36V-52V batteries.

I'd be really disappointed to buy a finished eBike with a DD rear motor, and no regen. Silly, just plain silly to not take advantage of regen. ANYTHING that improves eBike braking is a plus, for me.

I still believe most have NEVER truly tested their braking skills and brakes in a panic stop. We are not using the basic lessons from MSF (Motorcycle Safety Foundation).

I know how far I can push all my bikes and use MSF principle applied to eBike riding. REAR regen makes a substantially improved panic stop more effective. PERIOD.
 
I think you're lacking the experience. I'm telling you it decreases braking distances. PERIOD.
That's in real-world use with a CA3 and regen capable controller.

If Ravi and Justin aren't enough proof then hey, stick to the forum blather found elsewhere. We get some of the best and brightest here, me excepted. Yet the choice is to tell them and the forum that something engineers have found to be effective, in your book, isn't.

Now I'm truly done headbanging.


You're not excepted, you're one of the brightest and most informed contributors on here. I've just given up responding to this guy.
 
You're not excepted, you're one of the brightest and most informed contributors on here. I've just given up responding to this guy.
Fellows like Ravi leave me in the dust. But thanks Feliz. I'm happy we sorted differences and became pals! Now about that bike you're sending me.. Ravi's new bike is the first ready-built eBike that really got me excited. I am really anxious to have you share more!
 
Timpo,
First, this is NOT about geared hub vs. direct drive. It's about regen! THAT's the point!

You've managed to twist that into front brake pad wear. I don't think anyone else is arguing that point specifically. Not like you are anyway.

If talking an all out stop made at maximum stopping power, to avoid something for instance, I agree with you. The front WILL provide the maximum amount of braking as compared to the rear brake. I think we all know that.

Other times though, when you have plenty of time/room to slow, a regen equipped bike will slow without the front brake even in use! Just like using your engine braking by downshifting through the gears as you approach a stop - without using your brakes. You should easily be able to get that bike down to just a couple miles an hour. Stopping with the brakes at that point not going to take much is it? Or cause much wear?

And regarding MOST regen equipped DD bikes, the regen is not very effective at speeds below 10mph. The armature just isn't turning fast enough at lower speeds. That's what's so cool about the GMAC. Because of the 5:1 gearing, it's armature is turning 5 times faster, making it MUCH more effective at slower speeds (by a factor of 5!). Same as when a direct drive doing 15+ mph where the armature is turning fast enough to produce significant braking power.
 
The point of Deleted Member 4210 (OP) was, according to Evelo, an ebike manucture, regen is "it is simply not practical."

Which I totally agree, I don't think regen is practical. I think that was the whole point of thread.

No, as you mentioned, it wasn't about saving the brake pad. However I think people started talking about regen is actually practical or something, which I still disagreed, and for some reason saving a brake pad because one of the possible benefit of regen, and the rest went on.

Anyways, no, simply put, regen is not practical.

You need to ride a regen equipped bike. With your opinion, I doubt seriously that you have. Not while riding in any hills anyway. Sometimes you can't just regurgitate other's opinions, stuff you've read. You need to experience it first hand....
 
It would be great if there are demo GMAC ebikes, especially at the hilly areas, So would be buyers will be able to compare different ebikes back to back.
 
It adds 3-4 miles for every battery charge (so, 3-4 miles extra for every 60-65 miles) and that adds up over time and I had to replace my brake pads only every 6000 miles or so.

That's exactly consistent with what Bill Cummings said in the video. 1.5 miles on a battery that got about 30 miles. 5%. I've spoken with Bill on occasion over the past 4 years, and he strikes me as an extremely intelligent guy (but doesn't wear it on his sleeve and is VERY humble), and he is very experienced with ebikes, ebike design, working with motor manufacturers, and battery manufacturers, and awesome at trouble-shooting. Bill's general message was it wasn't practical, given that many people probably dont stop nearly enough in a typical ride, or necessarily get enough downhill momentum often enough, that adds up to a sufficient amount of kinetic energy that can be converted back to electrical, and that to do it right on an ebike involves a bit more than a simple 'switch.' The motor has to be designed for it.

Back to Ravi's message briefly here, for example, how much of the cost of the Stromer ST2, which today costs around $6500 at REI, has to do with Regen capability ? (rhetorical - dont answer - I dont wanna know and dont care) The extra 1.5 miles, probably could be much more easily gained and with fewer dollars, by simply getting even .5 amphour larger battery. Also, It costs less than 8 cents to recharge a 14 ah battery at 48 volts, so how much is the value of that 1.5 miles in every 30 ?

And I don't know how many people have the budget for a $6500 ebike, but in large part it appears Bill is addressing a general audience, where a large percentage of would be ebike buyers are more likely to be looking at a $1500 to maybe $3500 ebike, and they sometimes come up and ask dealers, or maybe they call Evelo , and they are curious about what they have heard about Re-gen, and whether it can be had on an ebike, and whether its really valuable or important. Is adding 1.5 miles to a battery that can provide 30 miles of range important ? And then these same customers ask, 'can I get that', or they might ask, "is it worth it to have on an ebike." (These are actual questions I have gotten - so again its nice to see a video like this)

So Generally speaking, to gain 1.5 miles on a $1500 to $3500 ebike, I would have to agree with Bill, that no its probably not really 'practical.' (for either the OEM's producing that type of ebike, or for the average customer, who probably doesnt want to spend or have the means to spend $6500 to get it. For someone who is buying a Stromer, and has the budget of $6500, which is very likely a very small part of the buying population, and who is likely buying the Stromer for a lot of other more important reasons, its probably a 'nice to have' little feature on it. Is it 'practical' on an ebike like that at that price ? Maybe. Especially given how pricey Stromer's batteries are, both in total cost, and on a watt-hour basis. How much could they take the price of the bike down if they didn't have Regen ? (I dont know - again rhetorical)

If you really want to get super technical, and theoretical, certainly 'regen' can add something. And judging from all the posts here, that is subject to debate on their definition of 'practical.' However, it does seem to me though, that a decent number of the posters debating the topic in this thread, are a lot more technical in general (Ravi's working on his Masters in engineering and batteries?) , and several of you on this thread getting a bit 'heated' certainly are way more technical than most of the AVERAGE customers I see everyday. It's those average 'joe or jane' customers that are the very likely audience Evelo sees everyday as well, and talks to on a daily basis, and as well as what most ebike dealers or bike shops will talk to everyday.

Anyway, I simply posted the video, because again, a) I get asked the question a lot more frequently than I would have ever expected b) there really hasn't been anything decent posted from any other ebike OEM even broaching the topic, and c) I'm a degreed mechanical engineer with quite a bit of practical motor experience, industrial equipment experience, and more than 34 years of being out there working with many energy technologies where the questions are a lot more challenging than this, but since my roles have been customer facing for most of those 34 years, I always truly appreciate when someone as smart as Bill, takes the time to explain something in laymans terms that can be very technical and hard for people to understand that dont have the same engineering or requisite technical background. Something like this video that takes the confusion out of it for a customer who may have run across the concept, or understands it from their experience with hybrid vehicles, and thinks it might be a cool thing to have, is probably being done as a result of them getting enough questions on it. Which is what Evelo's video series is all about. Providing some education that may not be out there for general consumption. I happen to like people and vendors who take the time to do these educational videos or articles. I believe those vendors do sincerely care about their customers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Every now and then we do get a "Ravi", or an "Al" or a "Thomas" who love to come in and debate such topics, rather than even actually buy an ebike, and who try to show you how much more they know than you do as the ebike dealer. ( Its such a treat. lol)
Seems we have the experience to draw on with no attempt to sell. Unlike dealers posting here. Perhaps there are fellas that have more experience. Certainly there are many that know more than me. But you completely miss the point from the original post. It’s about BRAKING, not energy recovery. Being a dealer doesn’t make one an expert. Near as I can tell there are several posters here with more experience than you exhibit. It’s best to remain curious and not bite the hands of those you could learn from.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back