Juiced vs RadRover

[Timpo]

 

[Feliz]

Great, what I would expect. I have the CCS and love it, thanks for posting,

 

[john peck]

The CCS has better components worth any extra cost. The Rad´s not a bad bike for the price...i guess, & the larger tires do allow
for a wider range of terrain. Shear performance has to go to the CCS. I love my CCS, but at times I wish I had a Ripcurrent. Can´t
quite afford both.

 

[Merc]

@john peck curios to know why at times you wish for the Rip over the CCS. I’m considering the CCX, but I do like the look, versatility of the Rip Current S. Although, I think about how I may use it and then conclude the CCX is more practical since it would be for urban commuting around Los Angeles.

 

[john peck]

@john peck curios to know why at times you wish for the Rip over the CCS. I’m considering the CCX, but I do like the look, versatility of the Rip Current S. Although, I think about how I may use it and then conclude the CCX is more practical since it would be for urban commuting around Los Angeles.

Only because it would be nice to have a bike with better off-road capabilities. My CCS is great, but not really a mtn. bike, even though i sometimes
use it like one. I love My CCS, but The Rip looks to be great for trails. It´d be nice to have both bikes.

 

[Merc]

Only because it would be nice to have a bike with better off-road capabilities. My CCS is great, but not really a mtn. bike, even though i sometimes
use it like one. I love My CCS, but The Rip looks to be great for trails. It´d be nice to have both bikes.

That Hyperfat looks pretty appealing!

 

[john peck]

Yup, that´s a lot of bike, more than I need. I´d be happy if I could just put 29¨x 2.5s on the CCS, but that´s too wide for the stays.