Future of Drivetrains, No Gears, No Chain.

OK, I now see the picture. The man rides on the throttle, and he only pedals the generator to produce more energy. On full power e-bikes, an average rider only contributes with 25-33% of the energy needed for the ride. With the generator of efficiency of 80%, the guy contributes as the battery charger with 26% max. Then, the energy goes to the electric motor at 80% efficiency. So the man effectively produces up to 21% energy that would eventually go into the rear wheel.

An exceptionally stupid idea. I would like to see the man starting the ride with 10% battery :D
 
Last edited:
The efficiency doesn't really matter, because the people who will buy it don't really want to pedal hard. They are interested in a moped. This Rivian ebike is actually getting a lot of interest (not from me, though):

In principle, this bike is a bad idea. I spoke to the Gates engineer assigned to this project, and "Also." demoed the bike at Sea Otter.

Pre-ride, my qualms:
* decoupled drive system is inefficient
* specialized frame / design is unnecessarily complex, including the detachable seat that seems like a potential weak spot (also it includes electrical connections for tail light)
* too heavy
* this $3500 market segment is maybe not the place to be for a successful product

Post-demo, OMG, I am impressed!

This is not the bike for me for a number of reasons, but I'll say this...

The decoupled drive system is not noticeable. It very much feels like a directly-connected chain or belt driven bike.

It's a torque monster on the hills. Laguna Seca has a steeply-sloped surface street that gains about 100' of elevation over a 1000' run, and this bike quite capably handled it without ever feeling like it was struggling, all the while maintaining a very natural pedal cadence / feedback. Everywhere I rode it it just rips around and is very response, a very natural-feeling bike.

The auto-shifting on this bike is quite literally seamless. I asked a bunch of probing questions about the transmission and was told "I can't go into too much detail, it's proprietary" but was told there were two motors that acted in combination as a variable gearbox. I can't find any reference to this online so am not 100% confident they weren't misleading me (perhaps the pedal input is somehow considered the 2nd motor). But wow... I could not lug the motor, it didn't feel slushy or draggy, and it was super quiet under all conditions.

In fact, I tried the "manual shifting" mode and it kind of sucked, it felt like adjusting power levels and not in any way a simulated gear shift. Shifting to a higher gear only made the bike go faster without the expected loading up of the cranks.

Although I mainly rode this bike as pedal assist, it also has a thumb throttle, and that was a hoot. This is supposed to be a Class 3 ebike (28 MPH), but the thumb throttle also took it to 28 MPH, but these demos were all pre-production so I assume they are going to reduce this in production software. Not quite sure how they'll resolve this since Class 2 (thumb throttle) should be limited to 20 MPH all around.

Despite slick tires, it rode fine on the dirt. The rear wheel wouldn't spin out but I don't know if there is an anti-slip algorithm comparing rear wheel spin to the front, or if "just didn't" (it certainly has the toque to and can wheelie). The front anti-lock brake would not lock up no matter how hard I tried, even on steeply descending loose, loamy downhills. However, once stopped on those steep downhills, releasing the brake the 80 pound weight of the bike became instantly evident.

At the demo tent, there was no suspension adjustment, they just handed me an my son our bikes (I'm 200, he's 140). I can't speak for him, but my suspension felt very natural kind of like I'd expect an all-mountain setup, in other words not XC harsh and not DH pillowy.

The 80 pound bike weight means this bike cannot be easily transported without a proper rack and/or loading ramp. It would also be not very fun to take up even a short flight of stairs.

The three seat mast attachments Also. had on hand were the version with the attached rear cargo ramp, one with a traditional saddle and an adjustable-height seatpost, and another with more of a mid-length banana seat without adjustable height.

I would absolutely LOVE to have one of these bikes in my garage but alas it wouldn't really be practical for me, particularly from the standpoint of bicycle home maintenance. Speaking of maintenance, these are going to be direct sales, but Also. is working with local shops to act as their service centers.

I hope this bike can find an audience and some success, because it's really good (and fun!). But I'm pessimistic just knowing how tough this market is.
 
In principle, this bike is a bad idea. I spoke to the Gates engineer assigned to this project, and "Also." demoed the bike at Sea Otter.

Pre-ride, my qualms:
* decoupled drive system is inefficient
* specialized frame / design is unnecessarily complex, including the detachable seat that seems like a potential weak spot (also it includes electrical connections for tail light)
* too heavy
* this $3500 market segment is maybe not the place to be for a successful product

Post-demo, OMG, I am impressed!

This is not the bike for me for a number of reasons, but I'll say this...

The decoupled drive system is not noticeable. It very much feels like a directly-connected chain or belt driven bike.

It's a torque monster on the hills. Laguna Seca has a steeply-sloped surface street that gains about 100' of elevation over a 1000' run, and this bike quite capably handled it without ever feeling like it was struggling, all the while maintaining a very natural pedal cadence / feedback. Everywhere I rode it it just rips around and is very response, a very natural-feeling bike.

The auto-shifting on this bike is quite literally seamless. I asked a bunch of probing questions about the transmission and was told "I can't go into too much detail, it's proprietary" but was told there were two motors that acted in combination as a variable gearbox. I can't find any reference to this online so am not 100% confident they weren't misleading me (perhaps the pedal input is somehow considered the 2nd motor). But wow... I could not lug the motor, it didn't feel slushy or draggy, and it was super quiet under all conditions.

In fact, I tried the "manual shifting" mode and it kind of sucked, it felt like adjusting power levels and not in any way a simulated gear shift. Shifting to a higher gear only made the bike go faster without the expected loading up of the cranks.

Although I mainly rode this bike as pedal assist, it also has a thumb throttle, and that was a hoot. This is supposed to be a Class 3 ebike (28 MPH), but the thumb throttle also took it to 28 MPH, but these demos were all pre-production so I assume they are going to reduce this in production software. Not quite sure how they'll resolve this since Class 2 (thumb throttle) should be limited to 20 MPH all around.

Despite slick tires, it rode fine on the dirt. The rear wheel wouldn't spin out but I don't know if there is an anti-slip algorithm comparing rear wheel spin to the front, or if "just didn't" (it certainly has the toque to and can wheelie). The front anti-lock brake would not lock up no matter how hard I tried, even on steeply descending loose, loamy downhills. However, once stopped on those steep downhills, releasing the brake the 80 pound weight of the bike became instantly evident.

At the demo tent, there was no suspension adjustment, they just handed me an my son our bikes (I'm 200, he's 140). I can't speak for him, but my suspension felt very natural kind of like I'd expect an all-mountain setup, in other words not XC harsh and not DH pillowy.

The 80 pound bike weight means this bike cannot be easily transported without a proper rack and/or loading ramp. It would also be not very fun to take up even a short flight of stairs.

The three seat mast attachments Also. had on hand were the version with the attached rear cargo ramp, one with a traditional saddle and an adjustable-height seatpost, and another with more of a mid-length banana seat without adjustable height.

I would absolutely LOVE to have one of these bikes in my garage but alas it wouldn't really be practical for me, particularly from the standpoint of bicycle home maintenance. Speaking of maintenance, these are going to be direct sales, but Also. is working with local shops to act as their service centers.

I hope this bike can find an audience and some success, because it's really good (and fun!). But I'm pessimistic just knowing how tough this market is.
Nice review. Through and balanced. It is cool tech but a biggie for me is proprietary dependence and complexity. You can't take it to a bike shop or fix it yourself. So many eBike companies come and go, leaving people high and dry.
 
Early days, electric cars are what they are, two minutes of research will reveal their limitations and strengths.
Apart from the explodytoxicgassy bit they are of a mechanical simplicity that approaches an absolute.
All the problems are scale, can we charge 100K cars?
How about a million?
To make it work we have to hand our freedom to a spreadsheet, we need to use our washing machines when the grid says so.
Or we could ask ourselves why we always need to be somewhere else
You can spread FUD.

I'm saving $300 per month with an EV and I'll keep enjoying that. Just don't ever complain to me about fuel prices. Because I'll laugh at you.
 
But I'm pessimistic just knowing how tough this market is.
There have been many inventions that pave the floor of bike Hell :) I said: "start with an almost empty battery and ride the thing for several long miles to judge". But it is not only that.

The EU definition of a bike is "a vehicle propelled by human muscle power... that can be assisted by an electric motor..." This invention is not propelled by human muscle power.
 
There have been many inventions that pave the floor of bike Hell :) I said: "start with an almost empty battery and ride the thing for several long miles to judge". But it is not only that.

The EU definition of a bike is "a vehicle propelled by human muscle power... that can be assisted by an electric motor..." This invention is not propelled by human muscle power.
Actually, it can be started on a dead battery. Particularly on the top of a hill to make it essay. Or, you can go along and charge the capacitor/battery while you ride on a flat It feel like a bike while viewing the tulips.

 
This invention is not propelled by human muscle power.
I believe that definition can be challenged, even with a strict interpretation.

For instance I can ride a kick bike (like a kid's balance bike) and agree that that is pure muscle propulsion. But turning a crank is a form of energy conversion into rotational energy, and turning a crank to generate electrical energy which is then directed to a motor is an extension of that same principle, despite there being a battery in the middle (or at least, not all that different than a chain or belt driven bike).

Now your observation about a dead battery is agree is 100% valid, and that would be interesting to test in real life. Also says that their TM-B can be ridden with a dead battery in "turtle mode" which I assume would not be an enjoyable cycling experience, but most ebikes suck to ride with dead batteries or with power turned off.

 
Now your observation about a dead battery is agree is 100% valid, and that would be interesting to test in real life. Also says that their TM-B can be ridden with a dead battery in "turtle mode" which I assume would not be an enjoyable cycling experience,
I would say it is an electrically propelled bike with the human being a small Range Extender. The generator efficiency would be at best 80%. The motor could be at best 80% efficient., making the decoupled drivetrain 64% efficient at max. Meaning, any 100 W human power would eventually be converted into 64 W energy to the wheel, while the chain/derailleur system is 99% efficient.

The empty battery example is very important here. Assume the person would try riding this e-bike. The 64% of human power would need to propel the e-bike and recharge the battery; that is why it is the "turtle mode". Fancy the rider would prefer pedalling while stationary just to recharge the battery. The most efficient charging (the charger) might take as long as 4 hours. I hardly can imagine pedalling in place for 4 or more hours just to recharge the battery as a typical bike trainer rider gives up in one hour...
but most ebikes suck to ride with dead batteries or with power turned off.
The major flaw of the system is the "human to wheel efficiency" lower than 64%.
 
I would say it is an electrically propelled bike with the human being a small Range Extender. The generator efficiency would be at best 80%. The motor could be at best 80% efficient., making the decoupled drivetrain 64% efficient at max. Meaning, any 100 W human power would eventually be converted into 64 W energy to the wheel, while the chain/derailleur system is 99% efficient.

The empty battery example is very important here. Assume the person would try riding this e-bike. The 64% of human power would need to propel the e-bike and recharge the battery; that is why it is the "turtle mode". Fancy the rider would prefer pedalling while stationary just to recharge the battery. The most efficient charging (the charger) might take as long as 4 hours. I hardly can imagine pedalling in place for 4 or more hours just to recharge the battery as a typical bike trainer rider gives up in one hour...

The major flaw of the system is the "human to wheel efficiency" lower than 64%.
You aren't their target customer. Nobody who buys that bike will care about the efficiency of pedaling it, just the range of the battery. I am sure that it will be programmed to meet the legal definition of an ebike in the markets they plan to sell it in. How would you like to be caught behind one of these guys in the bike lane? It's got pedals...

"The TM-Q unlocks new levels of efficiency for your transportation, logistics, or delivery fleet. Access the bike lane* and leave traffic behind—all at lower total cost of ownership."

Consumer_hero_15e60f3d-6add-4961-90be-ee286fefaf72.jpg
 
How would you like to be caught behind one of these guys in the bike lane? It's got pedals...
Illegal e-bikes have pedals, too.

1777015105365.png

A drivetrain of your typical food courier. This has been never pedalled. (Own photo).

That becomes a discussion of "how much suck is tolerable" and option C is "call an Uber" (...and good luck lifting the bike into the trunk! :D )
No one stops you riding on the throttle only, as long as there is a battery charge available. With the chain/derailleur or even with a drive belt/IGH, the rider's input in the ride is still significant. Here, you pedal to generate perhaps 40% of useless heat.
 
Last edited:
Actually, it can be started on a dead battery. Particularly on the top of a hill to make it essay. Or, you can go along and charge the capacitor/battery while you ride on a flat It feel like a bike while viewing the tulips.

what kind of a windmill is tiny talking about,a wind charger?
 
I believe that definition can be challenged, even with a strict interpretation.

For instance I can ride a kick bike (like a kid's balance bike) and agree that that is pure muscle propulsion. But turning a crank is a form of energy conversion into rotational energy, and turning a crank to generate electrical energy which is then directed to a motor is an extension of that same principle, despite there being a battery in the middle (or at least, not all that different than a chain or belt driven bike).

Now your observation about a dead battery is agree is 100% valid, and that would be interesting to test in real life. Also says that their TM-B can be ridden with a dead battery in "turtle mode" which I assume would not be an enjoyable cycling experience, but most ebikes suck to ride with dead batteries or with power turned off.

"any new tech is indistinguishable from magic or at best ,received gladly".
 
Back