Been lurking for a while, waiting for my membership to be approved.
I've looked at all the models, but I'm kind of old fashioned and like the original, hardtail mountain bike design.
I don't need the extra expense of FS or the added upkeep and complexity it brings. I also don't want a "Mullet".
I won't be doing hardcore MTB'ing, but more likely mellow single track and dirt paths, with the occasional foray into the local Bay Area Hills, where things get a bit steeper.
I also want a more upright seating position than your traditional mountain bike, and from what I've read, the 3.0 has that geometry.
My obvious issue with the 3.0 is the smaller motor and battery. The now unavailable 4.0 looked like the perfect fit: The design I want, with the power and range I'd like to see.
Given the $1,999 price, I considered buying a second, 530 W/hr battery, to increase the range to 1,060 W/hr., but the 50 Nm motor (68 Nm?) has me worried it won't be strong enough to pull my 220# body up the hills, at least not with the stock 9 speed cassette.
With the lower price, I figured I could install a 12 speed, 11-50, group-set and still keep the total cost around $3,500.
(Would that be of much help?)
I realize that $3.5K is the price of the FS 4.0, but that comes with the same, smaller motor and battery as the 3.0, so it's of no benefit.
I'd be into it for $4,200+ with a second battery. At that point, you're nearly at the 5.0 price.
Bottom line: I want mid-drive, decent power to handle the hills of SF, an upright-ish seating position, sized to fit a 6'5" rider, and good range. Oh yeah... I also want it to be affordable.
Thoughts?
I've looked at all the models, but I'm kind of old fashioned and like the original, hardtail mountain bike design.
I don't need the extra expense of FS or the added upkeep and complexity it brings. I also don't want a "Mullet".
I won't be doing hardcore MTB'ing, but more likely mellow single track and dirt paths, with the occasional foray into the local Bay Area Hills, where things get a bit steeper.
I also want a more upright seating position than your traditional mountain bike, and from what I've read, the 3.0 has that geometry.
My obvious issue with the 3.0 is the smaller motor and battery. The now unavailable 4.0 looked like the perfect fit: The design I want, with the power and range I'd like to see.
Given the $1,999 price, I considered buying a second, 530 W/hr battery, to increase the range to 1,060 W/hr., but the 50 Nm motor (68 Nm?) has me worried it won't be strong enough to pull my 220# body up the hills, at least not with the stock 9 speed cassette.
With the lower price, I figured I could install a 12 speed, 11-50, group-set and still keep the total cost around $3,500.
(Would that be of much help?)
I realize that $3.5K is the price of the FS 4.0, but that comes with the same, smaller motor and battery as the 3.0, so it's of no benefit.
I'd be into it for $4,200+ with a second battery. At that point, you're nearly at the 5.0 price.
Bottom line: I want mid-drive, decent power to handle the hills of SF, an upright-ish seating position, sized to fit a 6'5" rider, and good range. Oh yeah... I also want it to be affordable.
Thoughts?