Search results

Unlike you, I don't like to ramble about nonsense. This is a clear cut thing. Throttling among pedestrians is perceived as dangerous. Do a poll and I bet it will show that sentiment.

Actually, majority is correct vast majority of the time. That is why we have democracy.

Nobody cares what you think. It's what majority think. And you are in minority.

When you see one of these throttling down pedestrian path, and you are walking with you 5 years old daughter, what do you think?

Pedestrians look at throttles bikes and think it's a motorcycle. They want motorcycles off the pedestrian paths. It's perception that counts and what is narrow is to assume that people understand the difference.

I have all the support in San Francisco. Yes, expensive. But this is the best advertisement: https://www.ebikejourney.com/ebike/

Riese and Mueller. Can't go wrong with them.

It's a matter of perception. When you are around pedestrians who see you not pedaling, on bikes that look like skinny motorcycles, you will get complaints to authorities. It's utter nonsense to discount this. Throttled bikes should not mix with pedestrians.

Siberia bridge?

Siberia bridge?

The problem is throttling. Get rid of it, there will be no problems.

Keep thinking old man. Love your thoughts and passion.

I doubt it. The whole thing is just a PR.

Who is we?

Electric bike market is going down, unless the costs are significantly slashed.

Some big price discounts, but still not cheap.

Canadians are more woke than Californians.

A regular user doesn't understand if this is ambient temperature or what is meant by 0.5C

The guide is too technical. Point 1 will fly over many users heads. Who charges at 0.5C or less, unless you are in tundra?

Make sure the batteries don't explode and cause fires. Few that did in NYC are making people nervous.