That's the same reason it makes no sense to shoot down drones with missiles. Even the cheapest portable SAM costs around $100,000. And the fancy ones can cost as much as $5 million each.A cruise missile can be over $2 Million each, when targeting a mud goat hut. I will bet a Ukrainian drone that blows up a warehouse with a hundred million in dual use products is closer to $3,000.
I was watching a YT about WWII in the pacific yesterday, a battle at Buna in New Guinea. Towards the end the allies had a lot of field guns in place and one officer was using his to take out individual Jap soldiers. Apparently the shells detonated on impact with no problems and essentially atomized them, and anyone unfortunate enough to be standing too near. War, it's... Glorious.A cruise missile can be over $2 Million each, when targeting a mud goat hut. I will bet a Ukrainian drone that blows up a warehouse with a hundred million in dual use products is closer to $3,000.
Well, everyone but millions of pissed-off Ukrainians...
Yes, the "Russia could win this war if they really went all-out" trope has been around since 2022, never made much sense, and hasn't improved over time.
In 2022 it was possible there was a strategy that Russia could have employed that would have permitted rapid victory. But we obviously do not live in that timeline. I am very much doubtful that there is any magic switch Russia could throw and win the war tomorrow. Or even in six months.