Jeremy McCreary
Bought it anyway
- Region
- USA
- City
- Carlsbad, CA
it would be kind of sad to watch calories tick up so slowly relative to how quickly they can be ingested!
Reason enough to keep this metric out of sight.
it would be kind of sad to watch calories tick up so slowly relative to how quickly they can be ingested!
Was wondering this myself after seeing the bombardment of reviews of the analogue Endurace on YT this morning. They must sell far more analogue Endurace bikes then the ON:flys as its harder to find rider reviews and they don't market them half as much. That new Endurace mudguard system that looks like it simply clicks on and off but are full, discreet mudguards, looks very interesting as well.Hi all, thanks for adding me to the forum. I’ve just seen a new Canyon Endurace has been launched in Europe (looks exciting) and wonder if there is any possibility that a new Endurace Onfly will soon be using a similar frame design? I have been trying to order a bike since October with delivery advice changing weekly and currently showing not available to order until July - October. I’ve assumed that the delays are to with component supply issues but now wonder if the new acoustic Endurace frame design may be behind the lengthy availability delays for
the e-bike version. Certainly the new frame looks very appealing (particularly 38mm tyre clearance) and would make the already excellent Endurace Onfly an even more attractive option. Maybe someone on here may have some insight (Yako?).
On the Canyon GB website all di2 versions of the Onfly are showing as unavailable in all but XL and 2XL (unless you want the sub10 of course). This seems like it’s a stock run down to me. The reason for this of course is a different matter but I would expect that if the “old” frame is going to remain current there would at least be some stock in various sizes across the range. The other answer may be to do with stock availability and/or updates on the TQ side of things. Guess time will tell…Was wondering this myself after seeing the bombardment of reviews of the analogue Endurace on YT this morning. They must sell far more analogue Endurace bikes then the ON:flys as its harder to find rider reviews and they don't market them half as much. That new Endurace mudguard system that looks like it simply clicks on and off but are full, discreet mudguards, looks very interesting as well.
So far I think the TQ40 has appeared on Canyon, Ridley, BMC and Scott bikes. Haven't heard of any other brands yet? Personally I prefer the Canyon just because the implementation would suit my riding conditions; 2x with low gears and 180 rotors plus a comfortable high stack shorter reach geo, suit me and the steep hills near here. The fact they sold out might actually bode well for new models, and maybe a bigger roll out. Hope you find one available and if you do, be sure and report back here with some juicy photos!On the Canyon GB website all di2 versions of the Onfly are showing as unavailable in all but XL and 2XL (unless you want the sub10 of course). This seems like it’s a stock run down to me. The reason for this of course is a different matter but I would expect that if the “old” frame is going to remain current there would at least be some stock in various sizes across the range. The other answer may be to do with stock availability and/or updates on the TQ side of things. Guess time will tell…
Not sure if they are “sold out” in Europe, it would seem from the website that stock has been very limited or non existent since last winter. There don't seem to be too many owners out there. It sounds like the US roll out date matches when Canyon is predicting stock will be available in Europe so it may be that a possible new manufacturing cycle is planned for then. Who know if this will be with the new frame or not?Canyon says the OnFly will be available in the US by summer. I had hoped they would roll it out at Sea Otter , but if they are sold out in Europe then doubt we will see them anytime soon this side of the pond.
As I am new to ebikes and there were not TQ40 choices available in US at the time I purchased a BMC Amp with the TQ50. What I have discovered so far is TQ50 is more motor than I need in terms of assist, but I am happy to have the larger 350whr battery. I have tuned the motor to max 35W assist in Eco Mode and 60W in Medium and that is plenty of assist to provide the '10 years younger" ride feeling without feeling like I am motoring along. But even at those low power settings I doubt I could get more than 70 miles and 4000 ft of climbing on a fully charged battery. People told me not to worry about the extra weight of the TQ50 equipped bike and they were right. Once riding the weight disappears and on flat terrain I turn off the assist and it feels just like my 15lb acoustic bike.It sounds like the US roll out date matches when Canyon is predicting stock will be available in Europe so it may be that a possible new manufacturing cycle is planned for then. Who know if this will be with the new frame or not?
without testing it or failing that opportunity, seeing somebody on YT give it a rigorous review, it's hard to know about range and what it rides like unassisted. The battery is 290w? or maybe 250 but the bike is on paper so light then this might be enough. For comparison I've ridden a Vado SL extensively last number of years and that has 35nm, 320w battery but weighs a lot more (36-38lbs) My simple rule of thumb riding it is if I don't feel the weight on flats & tailwinds then I don't use assist, saving for hills & headwinds. With a lighter bike I imagine the ride feel will be such that I'll keep assist off for longer, on rolling hills that aren't steep for example. That's why I'm interested in the TQ40.Good to hear your positive experiences with TQ. The range of the smaller battery is my only concern, but hoping like others that the lack of overall weight and motor drag will make up for that. The TQ range extender is expensive!
Exactly the same for me but now that I have a 28lb E-Bike I am rethinking the weight thing. Only takes ~10W of assist to negate 5lbs for a heavier bike (TQ40 vs TQ50 with bigger battery). Dial up the assist slightly and the weight disappears, like magic.I have not had any experience with a road e-bike but cannot shake off 15 odd years of trying to make my bikes as light as possible.
That said I also bought 1200g wheelset and 3d printed saddle...Old habits die hard..replacing the wheel set & tyre combo with my 1200g Hunt carbons + GP5000 30mm and a saddle swap for a specialised 3d printed job.
The Hunt 40/45 Aerodynamicist wheel set is the fastest I’ve had. In particular they seem to hold the speed really well once up around 15mph so I’m hoping that breaking through the assist and holding +15.5 mph speeds on the flats should be as achievable as with my current 7.5kg Cannondale Synapse.That said I also bought 1200g wheelset and 3d printed saddle...Old habits die hard..
| Mode | Power Cap | Support % | Pedal Response | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eco | 30 W | 30% | Low | Offset bike weight/tire penalty while preserving analog feel and range |
| Mid | 60 W | 60% | Low / Medium | “10 years younger” mode |
| High | 150 W | 100% | Medium | Short-term boost for steep climbs, wind, or fatigue |
I am not familiar with Fazua Ride 60, but from you description it sounds like it has different settings and how it manages assist. On my last ride I watched the power meter and most of the time I was putting in 150W, the motor contributed 0W-10% of the time, 30W-50% of the time, 60W-30% of the time, and 150W-10% of the time. 42miles, 3500 elevation gain and the battery had ~55% charge remaining when I got home. I was riding with my wife who has the same BMC as me an her battery had 72% charge remaining. She is lighter and stronger than me so road most of the ride in eco-30W assist.Could You kindly explain more in details how do you use the assistance or even better which is your average watt/feet consumption.