Yes
@webcurl, it is, but more importantly, it's just as much about what they're
selling, and they indisputably have control of that.
I have received other international shipments during the pandemic, including a 2 meter long almost 100 lbs. box, in what might be slightly longer than usual timeframes but still a couple of weeks, nothing at all like this. And R&M have since, shortly after agreeing themselves that it was too long and it seemed something was wrong, now changed their tune and communicated to me that
6-7 weeks plus is now their new standard for air freight time (14-18 weeks plus for sea freight - so new bike orders should not be expected in less than 6 months), with 8 weeks or more deemed acceptable by them in my particular case since my bike was built before the originally scheduled date, notwithstanding paying for expedited delivery described as 2-3 weeks. (So, by analogy, if you ordered something from Amazon that was on backorder and paid a bunch extra for FedEx overnight, they think it would be A-ok to ship ground instead and keep the extra money you paid for overnight if it came back in stock earlier than originally scheduled.)
I find their attitude here puzzling to put it mildly, they are well aware that their dealers are selling this as 2-3 weeks and that this is no longer even close to true, and they also could certainly pay for the bikes not to sit around for weeks waiting for truck delivery - they’re just not willing to either pay to get them transported in time to make those timeframes accurate, or to insist dealers be up front with customers about how long their version of air freight now actually takes. Even if shipping times were not in their control, the answer is that you honor your word to customers - if you said it was 2-3 weeks if they paid you an extra $1300 and it was really 2 months, you need to do as
@JVBulman did (which should be on the OEM, as the shipper here) and give that money back at the very least, since the customer did not get what they paid for, and start giving future customers accurate timelines. It's never ok to charge the customer for one thing and give them something materially different, and claiming it's not in your control is not an excuse, that still means you failed to deliver what you sold, and what you sold is something you
did have control over. Here, the extra charge was for a specific delivery timeframe, and if you can't make that, and not even close but rather 2 or 3 times as long, failing to tell customers that up front, before they've given you their money for that specific thing, is not a fair business practice IMHO.