Thank you very much. I interpreted the table in this way too and you confirmed it. I add for ECO I reach 30 Nm of power and I stop them. If I want a higher level of assistance I have to increase the level of assistance to switch from ECO to SPORTING or whatever it's called. Is there the possibility with E-Tube to reposition the levels of assistance Nm of the different types of assistance? I read somewhere that the Steps 6000 series is not possible to do this. I don't know if the E6100 allows it. Thanks. HiI don't know what is the difference between the dashed lines and the solid lines. Perhaps upper-lower bounds? But it appears that each line is showing how much torque the motor will provide given a certain amount of pedaling force. For example, for the E6100 in Sportive High mode, if the rider is exerting T amount of torque, the motor will output approximately 2T additional torque (hence the 200% shown in the table) until it caps out at 60 Nm. So if the rider exerts 30 Nm of torque or more, the motor is capped out at 60 Nm. It appears that only Sportive High mode uses the full 60 Nm of torque of which the E6100 is capable. Other modes cap out at lower torque levels.
You are correct.Thank you very much. I interpreted the table in this way too and you confirmed it. I add for ECO I reach 30 Nm of power and I stop them. If I want a higher level of assistance I have to increase the level of assistance to switch from ECO to SPORTING or whatever it's called. Is there the possibility with E-Tube to reposition the levels of assistance Nm of the different types of assistance? I read somewhere that the Steps 6000 series is not possible to do this. I don't know if the E6100 allows it. Thanks. Hi
Hi very old post but I thought I would chime in. First great thread comparing the 6100 to the others. I will note that even though it is more of a treking motor Motobecane thought it might have enough power and put it on a dual suspension bike along side another with a 7000 motor.Thanks for the Shimano Steps Service Manual! Indeed, it has quite a lot of content that I have not seen elsewhere, or seen scattered about in bits and pieces. A great reference. I am also curious about the STUnlocker and STRide apps.
As long as we've revived the thread, thanks so much for this! These estimates seem to be for a 510 Wh battery, or that's what I'm guessing. And it's worth noting that BD/Motobecane even puts the 40 Nm E5000 on an MTB! I own the ULTRA eAdventure which has the E5000, and fortunately, weights only 49 pounds in a 48cm frame.Great information... thanks for sharing.
I have found these range estimates to be very close to reality when I am cycling on and off-road.
View attachment 71784View attachment 71783
This is very helpful even though I am riding a very different bike and am not at your level of training. The Dolomite pass?! Yow! Good call to be safe out there until the weather is warmer!After almost 3500km and around 12,000m of elevation gain with a BMC AMP Alpenchallenge I got an idea of the level of assistance. At least as regards the Steps 6100 my eRoad is equipped with. I state that my battery is 630 Kw that is the new SH battery. In the plains the values that SH gives seem quite exact. If you pedal near the detachment of the engine assistance - in Europe there is a limit of 25 km / h - the autonomy is at least 200 km more or less flat and common with minor climbs. Comuqnue you have to pedal and stay between 60 and 80 rides per minute because between these values the engine - at least the 6100 set in treeking mode - gives its best, operating in a constant and continuous way without jerking. The mode to use is the ECO the most appropriate. If you tackle climbs with various gradients between 5% and even 20% and with a length between 2 km and 7 km you can reach significant differences in height and significant km. I managed to do laps of 170 km and about 2700 m in altitude, alternating stretches in the plains and even challenging climbs with the values and characteristics written above. Always in ECO mode and always with a pedaling value between 60 and 80 pedaling per minute. Respectable values that can only be achieved if you have a good degree of physical preparation because tackling a 10% climb at 75 minute rides is not something that can be improvised even if you have an eRoad. The engine gives an important and significant help ... indispensable but also the cyclist who uses this eRoad must pedal with a belt of action. I have not done any tests with climbs on the Dolomite passes, that is, climbs over 10 km long because here the climate is still too cold and the descent becomes too cold to deal with even if you are dressed well. Then there is still a lot of snow at high altitude ... at least in my part and it is not worth taking risks even if it is fascinating to make a climb with snow walls on both sides until you go up. The eRoad fully satisfies me how I use it because it allows me to do things that I couldn't do with muscle. I am the owner of a Pinarello F10 purchased directly from the former Sky team and which belonged to the London 2012 Olympic champion Peter Kannaugh. When I use it, I feel that my training level has significantly improved using the eRoad. I have a greater agility in pedaling and this allows me to push particularly hard ratios in the plains almost like a PRO like the 53 x10 without suffering too much in the effort especially in the knees. Then the heart is much lower in the effort and therefore the recovery after a commitment takes place at desisamente much much lower and this is an extremely positive aspect for health. The eRoad is not a bike to "stay ahead of the pack" but a bike that makes you significantly improve the cycling qualities you don't have. For me it was the climb that I was tackling too slowly with my F10. Now I have to wait for my teammates and pull the brake ...... but it's not a question of racing or getting to the top first, it's the mental tranquility that a bike of this type can give you.