New Federal E-Bike Legislation March 2026

The CPSC / Federal regulations are supposed to establish what is legal for sale in all 50 states. Almost everyone gets confused on this fact. The states are supposed to regulate "use" of what the feds have established as a compliant "low speed electric bicycle" defined by HR727. I get a ton of heat on this forum every time I point this out
It would appear to me that most people here interpret use as "can you use it on the road?" rather than how you use it, meaning conduct. It is very frustrating when people only lock in to one possible meaning of a word and refusing to consider anything else. Below it is obvious that one poster thinks "use" allows for redefinition:

i’m not going to bother responding to your vitriolic “argument” but since you put it up there yourself, i’ll just point this out : state and local governments set the rules of the road. an overly simplistic federal definition of an bicycle or e-bicycle means said governments will either a) look for and create other definitions or b) just ban them. both of those things are what many of us have said would happen for years, and they are happening now.
They even circled all three points in the column in the table I prepared for illustration:

mschwett's red crayons.jpeg




I have no idea what they think the red circles prove. But hey, we've seen red circles in clickbait for decades that don't have anything notable in them. Somehow it is not noticed that the redefinition is a clarification of federal law,a ccording to PFB. This poster also scoffs at the law and refers to Congress as an obscure federal commission (not directly) that has no power over the states and claims folk like you and me do not have any understanding of American society. We have one confused consumer here. Sure, redfinition and bans are happening now. This is not becasue of an overly simplistic federal law. It's happening because PFB is manipulating everyone so their preferred manufacturers can corner the market. If this poster had any understanding of American Society, they'd be spotting the regulatory creep.
 
The original title for the video is why does everyone think my ebike will catch fire, he changed it after realising the old media tricks of exaggeration to mock is a bit tiresome, the new title isnt much better.
 
The new law will eliminate the sale of emotos.
eMotos were never compliant to HR727 as "low speed electric bicycles" but they will remain legal for sale as off road unregulated products (that is the loophole and it's not going to be closed but they should not be allowed to be called ebikes at the time of sale). Federalizing the flawed 3-class system may provide a warm and fuzzy feeling for some people but it's already proving to open the door to registration/license/insurance on some ebikes that are compliant to HR727 as happened in NJ resulting in plummeting ebike sales. The ebike friendly states are just going to "use" regulate all 3 classes as bikes as was intended by HR727.
 
Ken, times have changed. Few regulations involving transportation and technology go unchanged for 24 years. States abandoned them because they did not work. I know you think otherwise, but nearly every state felt they did not work.
The problem was not what was defined as compliant for sale in all 50 states by HR727 and regulated by the CPSC. The problem was off-road emotos being sold and used as ebikes that are not compliant ebikes. Slicing one class (low speed electric bicycle as defined in HR727) into 3-classes solved nothing - it did not prevent the sale of "off-road" emotos that some rider (many of them kids) are using as if they are compliant ebikes. I don't think those off-road emotos should be illegal for sale but states need to "use" regulate them better - mostly just explaining the liability risks if they harm a pedestrian while riding illegally on public infrastructure.

I can't imaging anyone with a functioning synapse would think that there is real world safety difference between a class 1 pedal assist ebike to 20mph and a Class 2 throttle assist to 20mph so how did that separation improve anything (spare me the argument that class 1 causes less trail damage that I have heard from many on this forum). What would have helped was clarification of HR727 did not allow full power to continue past 20mph but Class 3 to 28mph while pedaling helped provide a more clear performance limit.
 
would think that there is real world safety difference between a class 1 pedal assist ebike to 20mph and a Class 2 throttle assist to 20mph
It takes more attention to pedal at 20 than throttle at 20; thus my preference to keep Class 2s off MUP.
 
It takes more attention to pedal at 20 than throttle at 20; thus my preference to keep Class 2s off MUP.
What is a gas pedal in a car other than a throttle for your foot. So that is a low attention design / configuration that adds risks to us all? GP motorcycles routinely exceed 220mph in very close proximity to others at that same speed...they are paying attention while using a throttle. Excuse me if I don't grasp that it takes more attention to pedal at 20mph than to throttle at 20mph. Also remember escooters that are allowed on MUPs have throttles. If an ebike with a throttle is a greater risk on a MUP then escooters should be banned as well. Or maybe we should just ban anything that someone feels is a hazard on a MUP even throttle wheelchairs.
 
We are allowed 15mph throttles in the UK, you just need to apply for a type registration.
Ive notice a large drop off of delivery riders over the last 6 months, I think the insane pricing had finally worked its way into their tiny minds.
A visit to KFC used to be a horde of illegal ebike delivery riders, now theres quite often none at all.
 
What is a gas pedal in a car other than a throttle for your foot. So that is a low attention design / configuration that adds risks to us all? GP motorcycles routinely exceed 220mph in very close proximity to others at that same speed...they are paying attention while using a throttle. Excuse me if I don't grasp that it takes more attention to pedal at 20mph than to throttle at 20mph. Also remember escooters that are allowed on MUPs have throttles. If an ebike with a throttle is a greater risk on a MUP then escooters should be banned as well. Or maybe we should just ban anything that someone feels is a hazard on a MUP even throttle wheelchairs.
The logical (?) end to this is to prohibit anything and everything that anyone anywhere might find disconcerting, discomforting or in any way shape or form might be offensive. I’d say it’s the American way, but humans have behaved this way since time immemorial.
 
We are allowed 15mph throttles in the UK, you just need to apply for a type registration.
Ive notice a large drop off of delivery riders over the last 6 months, I think the insane pricing had finally worked its way into their tiny minds.
A visit to KFC used to be a horde of illegal ebike delivery riders, now theres quite often none at all.
I used to think that UK ebike restrictions seemed overly restrictive but now they feel that they're just ahead of the curve. US has been slower to respond with improved regulation for the sake of safety and basic sanity but we're coming around (not so long ago WA didn't even require insurance for motorcycles, that was insane). Laws evolve according to circumstances and WA state recently enacted ebike laws are reasonable and common sense, not in any way Draconian - even early on they seem to have made a positive effect locally. If one wants to ride and "e-moto" fine, just make sure that you aren't jeopardizing others. Use a DOT approved vehicle with registration and insurance, ride legally on the road in travel lanes, obey other traffic laws, stay off of paths/sidewalks and out of bike lanes.
 
We are allowed 15mph throttles in the UK, you just need to apply for a type registration.
Ive notice a large drop off of delivery riders over the last 6 months, I think the insane pricing had finally worked its way into their tiny minds.
A visit to KFC used to be a horde of illegal ebike delivery riders, now theres quite often none at all.
Legally as a bicycle, a throttle can only be used for walk assist up to 3.7mph. Up to 15mph it is legally classed a moped. You'll need a provisional or full motorbike licence unless you already have a car licence which covers it, you'll have to complete a one day CBT course, the ebike (technically a moped) has to be registered with DVLA ( £0 costs as it's electric), you need a full number plate & valid third party motor insurance and have a MOT every three years to check the ebike hasn't exploded in the meantime. Like everything it depends on enforcement and up until recently they were pretty much ignored but now checks are happening more and more. And recently police in the midlands destroyed a perfectly legal Tern e-cargo bike because they didn't like the look of the non white rider on the bike. Though they've had to cough up for a replacement bike since given the outcry, ha. Knowing the West Midland police's long standing reputation (he's lucky he wasn't Irish, just saying) he got off lightly... and another high ranking police offical stated publicly with full confidence, that the legal speed limit for all ebikes was 15mph, not just the motor cut off... smacks face.

I think some ebike recognition training is a bit overdue among the boys in blue.
 
Back