Interesting read about the nature of ebike motor and efficiency.

Trail Cruiser

Well-Known Member
I came across the internet about "ebike efficiency" from endless sphere
https://endless-sphere.com/w/index.php/EBike_Efficiency
and I thought it is worth sharing. The beauty of ebikes is there is a second source of motive power and that is your pedal power. It talks about the very basic principle about ebike motors. Here , it relates to a hub motor but the principle is still the same for the mid drives. The road speed on the chart is just changed to cadence on mid drives.

First, the power (watts) that comes out from the battery does not completely translates to actual watts to the wheels. There is a certain speed at which the conversion to mechanical power (motor efficiency) is highest.

(Link Removed - No Longer Exists)In this example, the motor efficiency is highest at speeds somewhere between 25-31 mph. The lower the speed, the less efficient is the motor. However, if we consider the power requirement at these speeds (as we will find out later), the actual window of efficiency is a very narrow 23-26 mph only since the motor is only strong enough up to 25-26 mph. The power curve slightly goes down to 600w at that speed while the power requirement quickly goes up to 600w at 25 mph and continue to go up above that speed.

EFFICIENCY.jpg


Those watt meters on some ebike displays do not always represent the watts to the wheels but these are the wattage that came out from the battery. And if you are on the wrong speed, most of those watts are wasted as heat. Or if you are in the wrong cadence in the case of mid drives. Basing on the efficiency curve of the hub motor above, it appears that it is ideal for high speed commuting.

To minimize energy waste at lower speed, a controller is used to limit the max current.

(Link Removed - No Longer Exists)In the old days, simple resistors were used to control the current but these are very inefficient and obsolete and are now replaced by pulse width modulation controllers (PWM) with the use of metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFET). The electrical current is then controlled to different levels. Example of this simple controller with different current settings at different assist levels is from a chart from Bafang mid drive (cadence is used at the x axis instead of road speed). The orange curve represents 100% (current decay is another user adjustable parameter in the Bafang controller)

powervscadencekeepcurrent20.png


https://electricbike-blog.com/2015/06/26/a-hackers-guide-to-programming-the-bbs02/

However, it is also important to know the power demand of an ebike at different speeds brought about by many factors and most especially the air resistance (aerodynamic drag), in order to further minimize power wastage when it is not needed and only apply power to when it is really needed.


(Link Removed - No Longer Exists)
1530624476231.png



You don't really need a lot of power at low speed but a simple controller's output is opposite (Cheap Chinese controllers). No wonder the cheap ebikes and ebike kits cannot reliably provide good battery mileage since you thought you are saving battery by going slower but you actually wasted a lot of power there. Most of the time, I notice that simple controllers feel "punchy" and tend to lurch ahead from a dead stop (great for showing off to friends) but once the ebike is already moving and you needed more assist, sometimes the power isn't there anymore, when you needed it the most.

Enter the Smart Controllers from the big players where more brain capacity is added to the controller's program in order to determine and match power requirement with the power output of the motor. And added measures are incorporated to cut the assist if the motor speed is at the inefficient range. This is made possible with the use of torque sensors and sophisticated program algorithms. An example of this is the "dynamic assist" from Juicedbikes.

Juiced-Bikes-Crosscurrent-Dynamic-Assist.jpg

http://juicedbikes.com.au/bikes/2017-crosscurrent/

As a general rule, the most sophisticated controllers take full advantage of the torque sensors and measure the rider's effort each millisecond (a thousandths of a second) and convert that into specific power to the motor based of the assist level. These are popularly called as "Proportional Assist" system.

upload_2017-12-27_0-37-57.png

It only goes to show that it's not only the motor efficiency that is important but how sophisticated the controllers are made. Not all controllers are created equal.

On mid drives, the gear reduction ratio is also set up so that the motor is most efficient at a cadence rate preferred by most cyclists (normal cadence range) .
bosch-efficiency-range-jpg.17778


https://www.electricbike.com/bosch-cannondale/

This principle in actual application made it possible for a small motor (mid drive) to achieve a very very impressive efficiency of 100 miles in 1 charge of the 500wh battery or 5 wh/mile!
https://electricbikereview.com/forums/threads/range-100-miles-giant-road-e.14617/#post-121767

This highest mileage potential is demonstrated by the small mid drive, but at a slower average speed (~15mph). The mid drives also has an advantage for the ability to climb very steep hills, as long as the gear ratio in the drive train is appropriate, but at the expense of even much slower, snail paced, speed (sometimes it feels like being pulled up by a winch!).

However, hub drives are not far behind in efficiency. Especially with increasing sophistication of the controllers and more efficient motor designs like the Maxon.
index.php

http://partir-en-vtt.com/fsb2/index.php?p=search&mode=author&id=52

https://electricbikereview.com/forums/threads/hub-vs-mid-drive-how-can-i-compare.14635/page-5

Hub drives are also more appropriate for high speed commuting, such as riding regularly at higher average speeds (above 23 mph) since the bicycle drive train at that higher crank output will wear out prematurely in less than a couple thousand miles. Or for transporting heavy loads such as the delivery ebikes.

There is still a bright future for efficient hub drives since, aside from the above mentioned strengths, hub drives are also very user friendly, easy gear shifting, durability, and is superior on stop and go city streets.
 
Last edited:
1. Looking further at the hub drive efficiency
https://endless-sphere.com/w/index.php/EBike_Efficiency
2. Exploring for more ways to increase the motor efficiency
3.The pros and cons of positioning the motor at the crank.

A hub motor's efficiency loss at lower speed can be minimized by reducing the limit current from 50A to 30A. The start up torque and and power at low speed is slightly decreased but the peak power is still retained and most especially, the efficiency at lower speed is slightly increased (yellow green curve).


efficiency 1.jpg


However, if the limit current is further decreased (for the sake of more efficiency), there won't be enough torque that is needed for the motor to start from a dead stop, or to climb hills.

If we really want to prioritize efficiency even if it means sacrificing torque and power output, then it won't be appropriate anymore as the original hub drive. However, it can still work in 2 ways. First is by the use geared hub and increase the gear ratio high enough for adequate start up torque and torque for the hills while sacrificing top speed. The second method is by relocation of the motor to the crank and then take full advantage of the multiple gear ratios from the drive train. We will continue by exploring the second method, which is the mid drive. But first, we will further expand the efficiency of the motor at the expense of decrease in power.

A huge reduction of the limit current from 50A all the way to 12A further broadens the efficiency band of the motor (peak power goes down from 750W down to 450W). On this new power curve (light blue curve) The peak motor power coincides with the peak efficiency of the motor (in contrast to the 50A and 30A, where the peak motor power and peak efficiency are at different motor speeds). The start up torque and torque at low speed is not that important anymore since it is channeled through the drive train. However, this is in exchange for mandatory downshifts at the stops and hills. All in the attempt to increase efficiency.
efficiency 3.jpg
In this example, the same hub motor is used and applied as a mid drive. The gear reduction at the crank is strategically chosen so that it will coincide with the cyclist's normal cadence range (~ 70-90PRM) . As long as the rider pedals within the normal cadence range (yellow window), the motor will operate at peak efficiency all the time, conserving energy and increasing the range of the battery. Notice the new power curve at 12A (light blue curve at the chart above) is similar to the Bosch and Shimano power curve on the chart below.

powers-jpg.17593


A similar simulation is found here with the hub drive with standard controller
http://www.ebikes.ca/tools/simulato...or_b=M2707&batt_b=B4812_MH&add=false&blue=Lbs

And then the limit current is reduced to 12A and comaparing between the two.
http://www.ebikes.ca/tools/simulato...or_b=M2707&batt_b=B4812_MH&add=false&blue=Lbs

With the new power curve at 12A, the speed is changed to cadence (kph x 2) for mid drive application. (You can play around with the throttle to simulate percentage level of pedal assist)
http://www.ebikes.ca/tools/simulato..._b=B4812_MH&add=false&blue=Lbs&k_b=.87&k=1.05

Using a mid drive to gain efficiency is easier said than done, since in actual application, the most troublesome part of the ride is the mashing of the drive train when changing gears, and the associated loss of momentum and loss of speed in the process. Sometimes, the efficiency gain is lost in actual translation when going uphill and then missed to shift in the right gear and then you slowed down or even come to a full stop. Whatever efficiency gain you had are now all gone.

Cutting the power to gain efficiency results to performance handicap to the mid drives (slow acceleration) when compared to hub drives, most especially noticed in stop and go situations. Just imagine having to downshift especially if the stops are very near apart and very frequent. That would be an unpleasant riding experience with a sore shifting thumb, from a supposedly efficient ebike.

However, the big players are working hard to fine tune their mid drives to make it as user friendly as hub drives. And I think there will be more sophisticated controllers in the future with a "city mode" button or push button dedicated to provide enough start up torque without having to downshift.

Or you can just pair it to a continuously variable transmission (CVT) like the Nuvinci Harmony where it will keep your cadence in the efficient zone automatically and also shifts down to the lowest gear (first gear equivalent) at every stop. However, the price of this Nuvinci Harmony is still prohibitive to most riders, for now.

(Link Removed - No Longer Exists)
http://www.fallbrooktech.com/cycling/harmony

In the US, the ebikes (that I'm aware of) that offer OEM nuvinci automatic transmission are the following:

1. Corratec Lifebike
https://electricbikereview.com/corratec/lifebike/
2. CUBE SUV Hybrid SL 27.5
https://electricbikereview.com/cube/suv-hybrid-sl-27-5/
3. Piaggio Wi bike active plus (28 mph top speed)
http://www.wibikenyc.com/activeplus/
4. Evelo Galaxy ST (programamble top speed, I think)
https://www.evelo.com/electric-bicycles/galaxy-st/
5. Tempo electric bikes
http://tempobicycles.com/bikes/
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the test data.
Especially thanks for the link to the Maxon hub motor. In a world stinking in **** products from a single source, Maxon comes from Somewhere Else. It is geared, which suits my need for 15% grade capability with 280 lb gross, and rare speeds over 15 mph. Maxon has cooling fins, which strikes me as design feature 1 in a hub motor. Especially as my dead hub drive didn't have them. The price is suitable for the extremely serious rider, but it comes with a toy 7 AH 48 v battery. Rim+spokes is DIY. Maxon has pedal torque sense, and is unsuitable for front drive. It seems to require those shimano/SRAM 8-11 speed sprocket clusters that reports say wear the chain out in 1000 miles. Ie about July 31 of my summer would be time to change the chain !@#$#$%^& The 13 lb hub has to be installed on the rear which on my grocery getter is weighing in at 85 lb unloaded already, with only 20 lb on the front. Unfortunately Maxon has no throttle only function, It is strictly PAS. Which makes it useless for getting me back from my summer camp when I've pulled a muscle or tendon or have a cramp and don't want to crawl 7 miles to phone service. Oh, well. Pedaling myself when not injured is the plan anyway.
 
Last edited:
Back