Alicia Margaret
Member
- Region
- USA
- City
- California
The Army is not expected riding these electric motorcycles either with traffic or on bike paths. Not in the times of peace, at least.
PDoz, with my deepest respect to what you're writing:
Civilians are not expected to drive tanks, either. These lightweight electric motorcycles make sense for the Army but I hope you would not advice using them by civilians?
The Imperial Japanese Army captured Malaya and Singapore in a storm trooper blitzkrieg down the peninsula on bicycles. Back then bicycles were definitely a force multiplier as the IJA only had a force strength of 30,000, mostly infantry versus 138,000 on the British/Australian side, who also had some measure of air cover. There’s definitely a large amount of blame on the British commands but the bicycles gave the Japanese mobility without the need for fuel supplies or large vehicles. 7,000 Australians didn’t return home alive from that campaign- mostly dying in captivity.
Funny they do not mention the motor used.They do produce a "legal bike " version, https://stealthelectricbikes.com/stealth-p-7/.
Here is a good article on the topic. War bikes were then put into service a highly valued cargo bikes after the war.The Imperial Japanese Army captured Malaya and Singapore in a storm trooper blitzkrieg down the peninsula on bicycles. Back then bicycles were definitely a force multiplier as the IJA only had a force strength of 30,000, mostly infantry versus 138,000 on the British/Australian side, who also had some measure of air cover. There’s definitely a large amount of blame on the British commands but the bicycles gave the Japanese mobility without the need for fuel supplies or large vehicles. 7,000 Australians didn’t return home alive from that campaign- mostly dying in captivity.
View attachment 104019
The Aussies need a hell of a lot more than bicycles though to defend their homeland against China. The status quo of their naval and air forces warrants a lot more attention and funding. Maybe the bikes are just a cheap distraction for their infantry.
I'd love one on my farm!PDoz, with my deepest respect to what you're writing:
Civilians are not expected to drive tanks, either. These lightweight electric motorcycles make sense for the Army but I hope you would not advice using them by civilians?
@PDoz: Quite an expensive form of a suspension seat-post, isn't it.
Did you notice PDoz the rear suspension is not a rear suspension at all, as it does not support the bottom bracket, for instance? In your FS e-bikes, the entire part of the frame you're sitting on is suspended, including the bottom bracket. Stealth has duplicated the 1990's idea of Giant (and other brands of those times) by actually making a complicated suspension system that effectively replaces a suspension seat-post only. It is not a full suspension e-bikeI'm confused, or perhaps you are? Those are Aus $ , so even with the added weight / cost of a 1 kwh battery upgrade , t's cheaper than your rigid bike ! Admittedly I'd be asking them to upgrade the suspension - which they are willing to do.
Completely academic, though, because I'm not interested in an overweight , overpowered bicycle - I want one of their light motorbikes to be road registered
you really havn't a clue. As a former super v 3000 and a gary fisher level betty owner i know you are clueless. But if you know better, head over to emtb forums, i'm suuuuure gary would love you. I dare you.Did you notice PDoz the rear suspension is not a rear suspension at all, as it does not support the bottom bracket, for instance? In your FS e-bikes, the entire part of the frame you're sitting on is suspended, including the bottom bracket. Stealth has duplicated the 1990's idea of Giant (and other brands of those times) by actually making a complicated suspension system that effectively replaces a suspension seat-post only. It is not a full suspension e-bike
Really missed that detail?
View attachment 104046
Giant Boulder Duo Shock (1990's). The same idea: a hardtail with an expensive suspension seat-post That idea was identified as fundamentally wrong soon.
Did you notice PDoz the rear suspension is not a rear suspension at all, as it does not support the bottom bracket, for instance? In your FS e-bikes, the entire part of the frame you're sitting on is suspended, including the bottom bracket. Stealth has duplicated the 1990's idea of Giant (and other brands of those times) by actually making a complicated suspension system that effectively replaces a suspension seat-post only. It is not a full suspension e-bike
Really missed that detail?
Giant Boulder Duo Shock (1990's). The same idea: a hardtail with an expensive suspension seat-post That idea was identified as fundamentally wrong soon.
I hope it is true, as it looks as if the bottom bracket were a part of the chainstay in the picture.No, they have an active swing arm that pivots close to the bottom bracket.