RidersSellers or riders?
RidersSellers or riders?
Great to read she is riding it "on the road"!The pedals have never been turned in that time. Its just one less car on the road as far as I'm concerned.
As well you should disagree were that my intent. By your definition, I am an elitist. And I am especially as eBike kit components are concerned. But I accept there are other views, paths, and talents.i do disagree with the recently-popular trend of labeling anyone who gives a s*it (or is good at something / knows a lot about something / has money) as “elitists.”
Worthy goal for sure. There is another though, maybe just as important, and that's to get people off their ass. Best way to do that IMHO, is to minimize excuses not to....i don’t disagree with the general sentiment here - live and let live - but i do disagree with the recently-popular trend of labeling anyone who gives a s*it (or is good at something / knows a lot about something / has money) as “elitists.”
it isn’t “elitism” to not want your kids crashed into on a mixed use path by 300lb of rider+eBike or scooter going 20mph. nor is it elitism to hope that people who ride fast have the skill necessary to do so safely.
i’m increasingly convinced the right approach is a combination of use limits - speed/weight limits on paths etc - and fairly broadly defined limits to the vehicle design. the goal is to get people out of cars, period. almost everything else is secondary IMO, but that goal won’t be achieved if the bike lanes and paths are dangerous chaos.
That's a concern of mine as well. But here again, there's a push to over-regulate even an MUP. I'd hate to see EU-style rules. I have enough sense to reduce speeds and not race through an MUP. Bannings based on devices, motor size, or potential vehicle speeds are counterproductive to me.that goal won’t be achieved if the bike lanes and paths are dangerous chaos.
i think most people do. unfortunately as the numbers grow, even a tiny percentage becomes problematic in a way that speeding cars on the freeway usually aren’t. the margin of error is just much smaller and the ratio of speeds much, much bigger between a person walking at 3mph and an e-bike at 28, on a relatively narrow undivided path. on the freeway that dude going 100+ isn’t even going twice as fast as everyone else, and they're separated from traffic coming towards them. i could see a path design which allowed these kind of speed differentials but it would be wider and much more costly, would require actual intersection design etc. the safe/sweet spot for simple infrastructure is definitely more like 15-20mph than 20-28mph. on flat ground, that really doesn't take much power.That's a concern of mine as well. But here again, there's a push to over-regulate even an MUP. I'd hate to see EU-style rules. I have enough sense to reduce speeds and not race through an MUP. Bannings based on devices, motor size, or potential vehicle speeds are counterproductive to me.
Worthy goal for sure. There is another though, maybe just as important, and that's to get people off their ass. Best way to do that IMHO, is to minimize excuses not to....
On a MUP Class 1 and Class 2 ebikes are allowed throughout the state of California (at speeds up to 20 mph, which is pretty much always too fast). Thats where the 'multi' comes in for Multi Use Path. And this is a state regulation, not a federal one, although I believe all states that follow the 3-class system have the same rules.On a roadway, they are both good choices. On MUP where motorized vehicles are not allowed, neither are good choices.
Although I'm being redundant, just because it is allowed by regulation, doesn't necessarily mean it's a good idea.On a MUP Class 1 and Class 2 ebikes are allowed throughout the state of California (at speeds up to 20 mph,
That wins you a ride on the ignore button!Thanks “Richard “ i can always depend on you!
By the same token, it also does not mean its a bad idea. Nobody likes crowded city streets, either... but thats just too bad; we live in an imperfect world.Although I'm being redundant, just because it is allowed by regulation, doesn't necessarily mean it's a good idea.
How does that button work out for you?That wins you a ride on the ignore button!
Not me. When somebody earns my ignore (not easy), they've proven I couldn't care less what they have to say.How does that button work out for you?
Tom will still post
and even though you ignore you can still see he is posting
but not what he is posting. And you will click un ignore to see what he has said.
same. it’s a short list though.Not me. When somebody earns my ignore (not easy), they've proven I couldn't care less what they have to say.
same. it’s a short list though.
it would be a fascinating social feature to see an anonymized venn diagram of who has ignored who….